# Review Hig Compliance

> Review iOS, iPadOS, macOS, SwiftUI, Flutter, React, or web interfaces for Apple Human Interface Guidelines fit. Use when Codex needs to audit screenshots, designs, code, prototypes, PRs, Figma exports, frontend screens, or app flows for native Apple feel, accessibility, typography, layout, navigation, controls, color, materials, Dynamic Type, safe areas, and implementation risks.

- Skill: `0xkoru/review-hig-compliance` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 3 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add 0xkoru/review-hig-compliance`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/0xkoru/review-hig-compliance/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Design & Media
- Author: 0xKoru (https://skillmd.com/u/0xkoru)
- Updated: 2026-09-22
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/0xkoru/review-hig-compliance

---


# Review HIG Compliance

Use this skill to evaluate an interface against Apple-style product quality. Lead with actionable findings.

## Workflow

1. Identify platform target: iOS, iPadOS, macOS, web with Apple style, or mixed.
2. Inspect the artifact: screenshot, running app, code, design spec, or PR diff. If possible, verify at multiple viewport sizes and color schemes.
3. Review in this order: task clarity, navigation model, layout and safe areas, controls, typography, color/materials, accessibility, motion, states, and implementation details.
4. Separate HIG issues from personal taste. Explain why each issue affects usability, platform fit, accessibility, or implementation quality.
5. Give fixes that are specific enough to implement. Include file/line references for code reviews when available.
6. End with residual risks and the smallest next verification step.

## Finding Priorities

- P0: Blocks core use, severe accessibility failure, data loss, unsafe destructive action.
- P1: Major platform mismatch, broken navigation, unreadable text, impossible Dynamic Type, unsafe safe-area overlap.
- P2: Noticeable HIG mismatch, inconsistent controls, weak hierarchy, incomplete states.
- P3: Polish, naming, spacing, icon choice, minor consistency.

## Review Heuristics

- Native feel: does the layout use familiar platform structures, or does it import web/desktop habits into iOS?
- Hierarchy: can a first-time user tell what matters and what to do next?
- Adaptation: does it survive small screens, iPad widths, orientation changes, large text, localization, and dark mode?
- Controls: are actions in expected places, with 44pt targets on touch platforms and clear affordances?
- Materials: does blur/glass clarify layers without harming contrast?
- Accessibility: are labels, focus order, contrast, motion, touch targets, and non-color cues present?

## References

Read `references/hig-audit-checklist.md` for a detailed checklist and source links.

