# Appendix Assembler

> appendix-assembler

- Skill: `45ck/appendix-assembler` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add 45ck/appendix-assembler`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/45ck/appendix-assembler/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: 45ck (https://skillmd.com/u/45ck)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/45ck/appendix-assembler

---

# appendix-assembler

## Purpose
Assemble appendices, supporting evidence, code extracts, tables, and supplementary materials into a coherent package.

## Trigger this skill when
- A durable documentation or evidence artifact is needed for review, submission, audit, or handover.
- You need clearer linkage between requirements, design, testing, defects, decisions, or findings.
- Existing documentation is fragmented, inconsistent, or weakly evidenced.

## Expected inputs
- supporting artifacts
- evidence files or references
- desired appendix structure

## Deliverables
- appendix structure
- artifact inventory
- supporting notes

## Operating procedure
1. Clarify the artifact boundary, audience, and review objective.
2. Separate known facts from assumptions, placeholders, and missing evidence.
3. Produce the skill-specific artifact in a form that can be reused directly.
4. Link the result to upstream and downstream artifacts where helpful.
5. Recommend the next best handoff instead of trying to do every document at once.

## Quality gates
- The output is specific to the current system, feature, or report context.
- Identifiers, references, and labels are internally consistent.
- Missing evidence or unresolved questions are made visible.
- The result is directly usable in a repo, report, appendix, or review packet.

## Handoff targets
- reference-integrity-checker
- evaluation-report-writer
- bug-report-writer

## Output style
- Prefer structured, reusable artifacts over generic prose.
- Make IDs, labels, references, and evidence explicit where possible.
- Preserve traceability between related artifacts.
- Surface missing evidence or unresolved questions instead of inventing closure.

## Failure modes to avoid
- Do not fabricate evidence, references, or approval.
- Do not collapse requirements, decisions, tests, and findings into one undifferentiated blob.
- Do not leave identifiers or document links inconsistent.
- Do not confuse “described” with “verified”.