# Review

> Review built feature/application output against the @adobe/data feature rules; report whether it is optimal and where any fix belongs. Read-only.

- Skill: `adobe/review` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add adobe/review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/adobe/review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Docs & Writing
- Author: Adobe (https://skillmd.com/u/adobe)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/adobe/review

---


Read the files under the given path and assess them against the relevant `features/`
rules (each layer's rule and the cross-cutting rules — `namespace`, `data-modelling`,
`type-casts`, `cohesion`, …):

- **Correctness** — does it typecheck and follow the layer's required shape?
- **Adherence** — single public export per file, naming, the scope helpers
  (`Database.components` / `resources` / `archetypes`), `satisfies` targets, barrels,
  store-layer typing, etc.
- **Generality** — no leaked type identities; follows the cross-cutting patterns.

Report either **OPTIMAL**, or a short list of issues. Tag each issue with where the
root-cause fix belongs:

- `code` — a one-off slip in the generated files (guidance is fine),
- `skill` — the phase skill's instructions are unclear, wrong, or incomplete,
- `rule` — a referenced rule is unclear, wrong, or missing guidance.

Do not edit anything — assessment only.