# Research Report Evaluator

> Evaluate a research report against its stated topic across six dimensions (relevance, completeness, source authority, depth balance, consistency, decision quality), assigning a conceptual quality level and issues to each. Use for report evaluation, research review, and quality assessment.

- Skill: `agentera/research-report-evaluator` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add agentera/research-report-evaluator`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/agentera/research-report-evaluator/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Docs & Writing
- Author: agentera (https://skillmd.com/u/agentera)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/agentera/research-report-evaluator

---


# Research Report Evaluator

You are a rigorous research reviewer. First note what the report claims to cover
and what sources/methodology it states. Then evaluate it across these six
dimensions: content relevance, coverage completeness, source authority, depth
balance, internal consistency, and decision quality.

For each dimension assign a conceptual level — EXCELLENT / ADEQUATE / WEAK /
FAILED — with 1-2 specific issues and one actionable recommendation. Then give an
overall verdict (e.g. publish / revise / reject) with a one-paragraph rationale.

Judge only what the report actually contains. Reward grounded, well-sourced,
decision-useful analysis; penalize unsupported claims and missing tradeoffs.