# Origin Close Session > Close out a finished repository task by optionally running origin-permission-audit, then origin-trouble-log, then origin-doc-update, then origin-git-cleanup. Commit/merge/sync the finished work and remove only approved stale branches and worktrees. Use for "店じまい", "後片付け", "片付けて", "クリーンに", "整理", "wrap up", "close out", "get back to a clean main", or after a PR is merged. Prefer this over origin-git-cleanup alone when docs/ governance exists. Do not use for mid-task rebase, cherry-pick, status-only checks, or docs edits without cleanup intent. - Skill: `aki2022/origin-close-session` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add aki2022/origin-close-session` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/aki2022/origin-close-session/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Security - Author: Aki2022 (https://skillmd.com/u/aki2022) - Updated: 2026-09-10 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/aki2022/origin-close-session --- # origin-close-session The single entry point for "I'm done with this chunk of work — tidy everything." Bundling exists for one reason: **documentation and git must be closed out together, in that order.** Doing only origin-git-cleanup (the common habit) leaves the docs stale, and doing docs after the commit means the doc edits miss the commit that origin-git-cleanup makes. origin-close-session guarantees the order so neither happens. This skill owns no new destructive behavior of its own. It orchestrates an optional permission-audit preflight and two closeout phases, each of which keeps its own safety contract — most importantly origin-git-cleanup's **survey → propose plan → execute integration → verify** flow. Commits, pushes, and green PR merges are autonomous; only destructive cleanup (branch/worktree/ref deletion or a forced operation) requires confirmation. ## The order, and why it matters 0. **origin-permission-audit first, when applicable — decide, act, verify, _then_ let Step 2 document it.** If this session granted elevated access, invoke `origin-permission-audit` before writing docs about it. That skill owns the discovery, classification, revocation, and verification contract. 1. **origin-trouble-log next — capture while the context is still here.** Sweep the session for troubles that were not already recorded at the moment they were pointed out, and write one entry per trouble. It writes outside git, so it does not interact with the commit ordering below. It runs before the git phase on purpose: that phase can stop for a confirmation, and anything placed after it would silently never run. 2. **origin-doc-update next — edit, don't commit.** Update the active workstream/issue, classify guide impact (required vs none), and make any `docs/` edits in the working tree — including the outcome of Step 0, if it ran. `origin-doc-update` owns ADR recording. Leave the edits uncommitted; origin-git-cleanup will pick them up as part of the same commit in the next phase. 3. **origin-git-cleanup last — commit everything, then clean.** It surveys the repo (now seeing the doc edits as uncommitted changes), proposes a single combined plan (commit incl. docs → merge → sync main → delete merged branches/ worktrees), executes the integration steps, and verifies the tree ends clean on main. Any deletion steps remain separately subject to confirmation. If these ran in the opposite order, origin-git-cleanup would commit and merge the code, and the doc edits would land in a separate afterthought commit — or get forgotten. First-permissions-then-docs-then-git keeps one reviewable, self-consistent commit whose docs match what actually happened to any access this session was granted. ## How to run it ### Step 0 — origin-permission-audit (only if this session granted elevated access) Skip this step, and say so, when nothing in this session (or a resumed session whose history you can see) required elevated access beyond the repository's committed baseline. When a grant exists, invoke `origin-permission-audit` and follow its discovery → classify → revoke → verify → report workflow. Pass its per-grant report to Step 2; do not duplicate its permission logic in this skill. ### Step 1 — origin-trouble-log Invoke the **origin-trouble-log** skill and sweep this session for troubles that were not already recorded when they happened: silent no-ops, completion reports that turned out to be wrong, questions asked about something already automated or already approved, checks that passed without checking anything. Record one entry per trouble. If there were none, say so — do not invent one. This step writes outside git and never blocks the git phase. Its main trigger is a user pointing out how the work was done, which fires during the session; this sweep is the backstop for the ones nobody pointed out. ### Step 2 — origin-doc-update Invoke the **origin-doc-update** skill and follow its SKILL.md against the current work. Concretely: read `docs/00_index.md` if present, pass the Step 0 report through, and invoke `origin-doc-update` for the active workstream/issue. It owns ADR recording, guide impact, and current-document updates. **Stop before committing** — origin-close-session commits via origin-git-cleanup in Step 3. Skip this step only when the repo has no `docs/` governance (`docs/00_index.md` absent). Say so, then go straight to Step 3. ### Step 3 — origin-git-cleanup Invoke the **origin-git-cleanup** skill and follow its SKILL.md, **passing it both of its inputs**: the repository being closed out, and the merge policy. The repository, because when this closeout was reached through an orchestrator the current directory is that orchestrator's own repository, not the target, and a survey that defaults to the current directory reports the wrong repository into a deletion plan. The merge policy, because `origin-git-cleanup` cannot infer it and its defaults all point at merging. State `human-gated` whenever the workstream's envelope reserves the merge or the caller said not to merge — a reservation carried only in this skill's prose gets merged by the skill that performs the merge, and the report reads as an ordinary landing. Its Stage 1 survey now includes the doc edits from Step 2 as uncommitted changes, so its Stage 3 plan should propose committing code **and** docs together. Execute that integration plan autonomously, and finish on main, clean, and synced. **Under a gated merge policy, the finish line is different and must not be chased past.** When the workstream's envelope marks merge as human-gated, or the caller says the PR is not to be merged, closeout is complete once the work is committed, pushed, and the PR exists — with the PR still open and the branch still present. That is the finished state, not a partial one: do not merge to reach "clean on main", and do not delete the branch the open PR needs. Report the PR and stop. The tree being clean matters; the branch it is standing on does not have to be main. If cleanup would delete a branch, worktree, or ref **that this session did not create**, obtain confirmation for those deletion steps. Deleting the branch this session made and just merged is part of the merge (see origin-git-cleanup's deletion authority). The current branch you are standing on is the usual cleanup target — origin-git-cleanup now handles switching to main before deleting it (local and remote). Don't short-circuit that; let origin-git-cleanup's stages run. If the current session worktree itself is an approved clean deletion target, origin-git-cleanup must run `cd && git worktree remove ` in one shell invocation so the removal process is no longer inside the directory it removes. ## Destructive-cleanup approval principle Do not request approval for ordinary integration. origin-doc-update's edits are ordinary, reviewable file changes; surface them and let origin-git-cleanup commit, push, and merge them after its checks pass. If destructive cleanup is needed, present only those deletion targets and obtain one confirmation before acting. ## When part of the flow doesn't apply - **No `docs/` governance** → skip Step 2, run Step 1 and Step 3 only. - **Nothing to document** (pure refactor with no behavior/API change, and origin-doc-update concludes "guide impact: none") → record that conclusion, then Step 3. - **Already on a clean main with nothing to merge** → origin-doc-update may still have index/workstream updates; otherwise origin-close-session is a no-op beyond confirming the clean state. Say so rather than inventing work. ## What "done" looks like Same end state origin-git-cleanup verifies, plus docs current: - active workstream/issue reflects the finished work; guides updated where behavior changed; qualifying decisions are recorded and linked in `docs/adrs/`, - working tree clean, root on `main`, `main == origin/main`, - only intentional branches/worktrees remain, each with a stated disposition, - the session's troubles are recorded, or their absence is stated.