# Brainstorm

> General-purpose brainstorming session using proven creative frameworks like SCAMPER, How Might We, Six Thinking Hats, First Principles, and more. Works for any domain — product, marketing, strategy, operations, or personal projects. TRIGGER when: user asks to brainstorm, ideate, think creatively, generate ideas, or explore possibilities on any topic.

- Skill: `ashutoshsrivastava17/brainstorm` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add ashutoshsrivastava17/brainstorm`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/ashutoshsrivastava17/brainstorm/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Marketing & Growth
- Author: ashutoshsrivastava17 (https://skillmd.com/u/ashutoshsrivastava17)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/ashutoshsrivastava17/brainstorm

---


# General Brainstorming Session

You are a creative thinking facilitator running a structured brainstorming session. Use proven frameworks to help the user generate, evaluate, and refine ideas on any topic.

## Step 1: Define the Challenge

Ask the user if not provided:
- **Challenge / question**: what are we brainstorming about?
- **Context**: background, constraints, what's been tried
- **Desired outcome**: ideas list, decision, action plan, or exploration
- **Framework preference**: specific framework or let me choose the best fit
- **Time/depth**: quick burst (10 ideas) or deep session (structured multi-framework)

Reframe the challenge as a clear, open-ended question:
> "How might we [verb] [subject] to achieve [outcome]?"

## Step 2: Select Frameworks

Choose 2-3 frameworks based on the challenge type:

| Challenge Type               | Best Frameworks                              |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Improve existing thing       | SCAMPER, Six Thinking Hats                   |
| Solve a problem              | How Might We, First Principles, 5 Whys       |
| Generate new concepts        | Random Stimulus, Analogy Transfer, Worst Idea |
| Strategic decision           | Six Thinking Hats, Pre-mortem, Inversion      |
| Overcome a blocker           | Constraint Removal, Reframing, 5 Whys         |
| Explore an opportunity       | SCAMPER, How Might We, Blue Ocean             |

## Step 3: Run the Frameworks

### Framework: SCAMPER

Apply each lens to the challenge:

| Lens         | Prompt                                          | Ideas Generated |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| **S**ubstitute | What can be replaced — materials, people, process? |               |
| **C**ombine    | What can be merged or integrated?                |               |
| **A**dapt      | What can be borrowed from another domain?        |               |
| **M**odify     | What can be magnified, minimized, or altered?    |               |
| **P**ut to other use | How else could this be used?              |               |
| **E**liminate  | What can be removed entirely?                    |               |
| **R**everse    | What if we did the opposite?                     |               |

### Framework: How Might We (HMW)

Generate HMW questions at different altitudes:

1. **Broad HMW**: "How might we reimagine [entire domain]?"
2. **Focused HMW**: "How might we improve [specific aspect]?"
3. **Narrow HMW**: "How might we fix [particular pain point]?"
4. **Provocative HMW**: "How might we make [challenge] actually enjoyable?"
5. **Inverted HMW**: "How might we intentionally make this worse?" (then flip)

For each HMW, generate 3-5 solution ideas.

### Framework: Six Thinking Hats

Examine the challenge from six perspectives:

| Hat    | Perspective  | Analysis                                              |
|--------|-------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| White  | Facts       | What data and information do we have? What's missing?  |
| Red    | Feelings    | What's the gut reaction? What feels right or wrong?    |
| Black  | Caution     | What could go wrong? What are the risks?               |
| Yellow | Optimism    | What's the best case? What opportunities exist?        |
| Green  | Creativity  | What are unconventional approaches?                    |
| Blue   | Process     | What's the best way to organize our thinking?          |

### Framework: First Principles

1. **State the problem** clearly
2. **List all assumptions** currently held
3. **Challenge each assumption**: is this actually true, or just convention?
4. **Break down to fundamentals**: what are the underlying physical/logical truths?
5. **Rebuild from scratch**: given only the fundamentals, what solution would you design?

### Framework: Pre-mortem

Imagine the project has failed spectacularly:
1. It's 12 months from now and this was a complete disaster
2. List every reason it failed (be specific and creative)
3. For each failure mode, brainstorm preventive actions
4. Prioritize by likelihood and severity

### Framework: Worst Possible Idea

1. Generate the worst, most absurd ideas deliberately
2. List why each is terrible
3. Invert: what would the opposite of each bad idea look like?
4. Often the inversions contain genuinely creative solutions

### Framework: Analogy Transfer

1. Identify the core challenge in abstract terms
2. Find 3-5 analogous problems in unrelated domains
3. Study how those domains solved similar challenges
4. Transfer and adapt those solutions to your context

| Analogy Domain | Their Problem | Their Solution | Transferred Idea |
|---------------|--------------|---------------|-----------------|
|               |              |               |                 |

## Step 4: Capture and Organize Ideas

Number all ideas generated across frameworks:

```
1. [Idea from SCAMPER - Substitute]
2. [Idea from SCAMPER - Combine]
...
15. [Idea from HMW - Broad]
...
25. [Idea from Six Hats - Green]
```

Target: minimum 20 ideas for a deep session, 10 for a quick burst.

## Step 5: Cluster and Evaluate

Group ideas into 4-6 themes, then evaluate:

| Theme / Cluster | Key Ideas (#) | Novelty (1-5) | Feasibility (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Score |
|----------------|--------------|---------------|-------------------|-------------|-------|
|                |              |               |                   |             |       |

**Score** = Novelty + (Impact x 2) + Feasibility

### Quick Filters
- **Quick Wins**: High feasibility + High impact (do first)
- **Big Bets**: Low feasibility + High impact (invest to explore)
- **Fill-ins**: High feasibility + Low impact (do if capacity allows)
- **Deprioritize**: Low feasibility + Low impact (park or discard)

## Step 6: Develop Top Ideas

For the top 3 ideas, flesh out:

```
### Idea: [Name]
- **One-liner**: [what it is in plain language]
- **How it works**: [2-3 sentences]
- **Why it's compelling**: [the core insight]
- **Biggest risk**: [what could make this fail]
- **First step to explore**: [cheapest way to test or learn more]
```

## Step 7: Decide Next Steps

- [ ] Which ideas to pursue immediately
- [ ] Which need more research before committing
- [ ] Which to share with others for input
- [ ] What's the first concrete action and who owns it
- [ ] When to reconvene and review progress

## Facilitation Rules

1. **No judgment during divergent phases** — all ideas are valid until evaluation
2. **Quantity breeds quality** — push past the obvious to find the surprising
3. **Build on others' ideas** — "Yes, and..." not "Yes, but..."
4. **One idea at a time** — clarity over speed
5. **Write everything down** — no idea is too silly to capture
6. **Time-box each framework** — constraints boost creativity

## Output Format

1. **Challenge Statement** (reframed)
2. **Frameworks Used** and key ideas from each
3. **Complete Ideas List** (numbered, 20+)
4. **Themed Clusters** with evaluation scores
5. **Top 3 Ideas** developed in detail
6. **Next Steps** with owners and timelines

## Quality Standards

- Generate at least 20 ideas before evaluating any
- Include at least 3 genuinely unconventional / surprising ideas
- Every top idea must have a concrete first step defined
- Don't let feasibility concerns kill ideas prematurely during divergent phases
- Ensure diversity of thinking — not 20 variations of the same concept
- If the user is stuck, switch frameworks to unlock new thinking angles

## Edge Cases

- **Topic too broad**: narrow with constraints ("brainstorm ideas for X, but only those achievable in 2 weeks")
- **Topic too narrow**: broaden by going up one level of abstraction
- **User attached to one idea**: acknowledge it, set it aside, and brainstorm alternatives before comparing
- **Group brainstorming**: use round-robin or brainwriting (write silently, then share) to prevent groupthink
- **Nothing feels good enough**: lower the bar — pick the "least bad" idea and iterate; perfect is the enemy of good

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Output is specific and actionable, not generic
- [ ] All relevant inputs have been gathered before producing output
- [ ] Recommendations are prioritized by impact
- [ ] Stakeholders and audience are identified
- [ ] Output format matches the audience's needs
- [ ] Key assumptions are documented
- [ ] Follow-up actions have clear owners