# Code Review > [UDS] Reference for systematic code review: eight review categories and BLOCKING/IMPORTANT/SUGGESTION comment prefixes. Use when: reviewing a pull request or diff, deciding how to phrase and prioritise review comments, agreeing review scope with a team. Not for: executing a gated review workflow — that moved to the adoption layer (XSPEC-095); pre-commit gate verification — use /checkin. Keywords: code review, pull request review, review checklist, BLOCKING, comment prefix, 程式碼審查, 審查類別, 評論前綴. - Skill: `asiaostrich/code-review` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 4 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add asiaostrich/code-review` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/asiaostrich/code-review/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Productivity - Author: AsiaOstrich (https://skillmd.com/u/asiaostrich) - Updated: 2026-09-10 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/asiaostrich/code-review --- # Code Review Assistant | 程式碼審查助手 > ⚠️ **Status: Reference（參考用，非可執行流程）** — 程式碼審查流程協調（4 步驟序列、outcome gating）已於 2026-04-28 移至 **adoption layer（XSPEC-095）**。此處保留 8 大審查類別定義、BLOCKING/IMPORTANT/SUGGESTION/QUESTION/NOTE 前綴語意供參考。 > Lifecycle orchestration has moved to the adoption layer (XSPEC-095); this document is **reference-only**. For enforced execution, use your adoption layer's toolchain. Perform systematic code review using standardized checklists and comment prefixes. 執行系統性的程式碼審查，使用標準化的檢查清單和評論前綴。 ## Workflow | 工作流程 > 📖 以下為流程的**參考結構**，非可執行步驟；自動化／強制執行請用 adoption layer 工具鏈（XSPEC-095）。 > The steps below are a **reference structure**, not an executable workflow. 1. **Identify changes** - Get diff of files to review via `git diff` or `git show` 2. **Apply checklist** - Check each review category systematically 3. **Generate report** - Output findings with standard comment prefixes 4. **Summarize** - Provide overall assessment and recommended actions ## Review Categories | 審查類別 1. **Functionality** - Does it work correctly? | 功能是否正確？ 2. **Design** - Is the architecture appropriate? | 架構是否合適？ 3. **Quality** - Is the code clean and maintainable? | 程式碼是否乾淨可維護？ 4. **Readability** - Is it easy to understand? | 是否容易理解？ 5. **Tests** - Is there adequate test coverage? | 測試覆蓋是否足夠？ 6. **Security** - Are there any vulnerabilities? | 是否有安全漏洞？ 7. **Performance** - Is it efficient? | 是否有效率？ 8. **Error Handling** - Are errors handled properly? | 錯誤處理是否妥當？ ## Comment Prefixes | 評論前綴 | Prefix | Meaning | Action | 動作 | |--------|---------|--------|------| | **BLOCKING** | Must fix before merge | Required | 必須修復 | | **IMPORTANT** | Should fix | Recommended | 建議修復 | | **SUGGESTION** | Nice-to-have | Optional | 可選改善 | | **QUESTION** | Need clarification | Discuss | 需要討論 | | **NOTE** | Informational | FYI | 僅供參考 | ## Usage | 使用方式 - `/code-review` - Review all changes in current branch - `/code-review src/auth.js` - Review specific file - `/code-review feature/login` - Review specific branch ## Next Steps Guidance | 下一步引導 After `/code-review` completes, the AI assistant should suggest: > **程式碼審查完成。建議下一步 / Code review complete. Suggested next steps:** > - 有 ❗ BLOCKING 項目 → 修復後重新執行 `/code-review` — Fix issues then re-run `/code-review` > - 全部通過 → 執行 `/checkin` 品質關卡 ⭐ **Recommended / 推薦** — All passed → Run `/checkin` quality gates > - 僅有 💡 SUGGESTION → 執行 `/commit` 提交變更 — Only suggestions → Run `/commit` > - 審查中發現規範不實用或缺失 → 執行 `/audit --report` 回報 — Found impractical or missing standards → Run `/audit --report` ## Reference | 參考 - [Pre-Commit Checklist](./checkin-checklist.md) — Read it before committing, as the pre-commit pass. - Detailed guide: [guide.md](./guide.md) - Core standard: [code-review-checklist.md](../../core/code-review-checklist.md) ## AI Agent Behavior | AI 代理行為 > 完整的 AI 行為定義請參閱對應的命令文件：[`/code-review`](../commands/code-review.md#ai-agent-behavior--ai-代理行為) > > For complete AI agent behavior definition, see the corresponding command file: [`/code-review`](../commands/code-review.md#ai-agent-behavior--ai-代理行為)