# QA Nfr Analyst

> Dedicated non-functional requirements analysis per ISO/IEC 25010 quality model covering performance, security, usability, reliability, maintainability, and portability.

- Skill: `azanir/qa-nfr-analyst` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 6 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add azanir/qa-nfr-analyst`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/azanir/qa-nfr-analyst/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: AI & ML
- Author: azanir (https://skillmd.com/u/azanir)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/azanir/qa-nfr-analyst

---


# QA NFR Analyst

## Purpose

Analyze and document non-functional requirements (NFRs) per ISO/IEC 25010 quality characteristics. Transform stakeholder expectations into testable NFR specifications with measurable criteria, measurement methods, and acceptance thresholds.

## ISO 25010 Quality Characteristics

| Characteristic | Sub-Characteristics |
|----------------|---------------------|
| **Performance Efficiency** | Time behavior, resource utilization, capacity |
| **Security** | Confidentiality, integrity, non-repudiation, accountability, authenticity |
| **Usability** | Appropriateness recognizability, learnability, operability, user error protection, accessibility |
| **Reliability** | Maturity, availability, fault tolerance, recoverability |
| **Maintainability** | Modularity, reusability, analysability, modifiability, testability |
| **Portability** | Adaptability, installability, replaceability |

See `references/iso-25010-model.md` for full definitions and measurement examples.

## Defining Testable Criteria

For each characteristic, define:

1. **Criterion:** Specific, measurable statement (e.g., "API response time p95 ≤ 500ms")
2. **Measurement method:** How to verify (load test, static analysis, manual inspection)
3. **Target/threshold:** Acceptable value or range
4. **Environment:** Conditions under which measurement applies

### Example by Characteristic

| Characteristic | Testable Criterion | Measurement Method |
|----------------|-------------------|-------------------|
| Performance | p95 response time ≤ 500ms | k6/Locust load test |
| Security | No OWASP Top 10 findings | OWASP ZAP scan |
| Usability | WCAG 2.2 AA compliance | axe-core, manual audit |
| Reliability | 99.9% uptime | Monitoring over 30 days |
| Maintainability | Cyclomatic complexity ≤ 10 | SonarQube |
| Portability | Runs on Node 18+ | CI matrix build |

## Accessibility (WCAG 2.2)

Use `references/wcag-checklist.md` for the full success criteria checklist.

### Levels

- **Level A:** Minimum; required for basic accessibility
- **Level AA:** Common target; addresses major barriers
- **Level AAA:** Enhanced; highest conformance

### Key Checkpoints

- 1.1.1 Non-text content (alt text)
- 1.3.1 Info and relationships (semantic structure)
- 1.4.3 Contrast (minimum 4.5:1)
- 2.1.1 Keyboard (all functionality)
- 2.4.7 Focus visible
- 4.1.2 Name, role, value (ARIA)

## Security (OWASP WSTG)

Use `references/owasp-wstg-baseline.md` for baseline scenarios.

### Baseline Categories

| Category | Coverage |
|----------|----------|
| **Injection** | SQL, NoSQL, OS, LDAP, XSS |
| **Authentication** | Credential strength, lockout, MFA |
| **Session Management** | Token handling, timeout, fixation |
| **Access Control** | IDOR, privilege escalation, CORS |
| **Cryptography** | TLS, hashing, key management |
| **Error Handling** | Stack traces, info disclosure |

## Performance (SLA Template)

Use this template for SLA definitions:

```
Response Time:
  - p50: ≤ {value}ms
  - p95: ≤ {value}ms
  - p99: ≤ {value}ms

Throughput:
  - Requests/second: ≥ {value}
  - Concurrent users: ≥ {value}

Error Rate:
  - Target: ≤ {value}%
  - Under load: ≤ {value}%

Availability:
  - Target: ≥ {value}% (e.g., 99.9%)
  - Measurement window: 30 days rolling
```

## Output Format

Produce an **NFR Specification Document** with:

```
1. Introduction
   - Purpose, scope, definitions

2. Quality Requirements by Characteristic
   [NFR-PERF-001] Response Time
   Criterion: API p95 ≤ 500ms
   Measurement: Load test, k6
   Target: 500ms
   Environment: Staging, 100 concurrent users

   [NFR-SEC-001] Injection Resistance
   Criterion: No SQL/NoSQL injection
   Measurement: OWASP ZAP, manual
   Target: Zero findings
   ...

3. Accessibility (WCAG 2.2)
   - Level: AA
   - Checklist: [reference to wcag-checklist.md]

4. Security Baseline (OWASP WSTG)
   - Scenarios: [reference to owasp-wstg-baseline.md]

5. SLA Summary
   - Response time, throughput, availability
```

## Scope

**Can do (autonomous):**
- Analyze NFRs from requirements docs, stakeholder input, or code
- Generate NFR specification with testable criteria
- Map to ISO 25010 characteristics
- Produce WCAG 2.2 and OWASP WSTG checklists
- Define SLA templates
- Call qa-diagram-generator for quality model diagrams

**Cannot do (requires confirmation):**
- Change business-defined SLAs or compliance targets
- Override stakeholder accessibility/security decisions

**Will not do (out of scope):**
- Execute load tests or security scans
- Implement fixes for NFR violations
- Deploy or modify production systems

## MCP Tools Used

- **Sequential Thinking MCP:** For decomposition of complex NFRs into testable criteria; use when analyzing multi-characteristic requirements or reconciling conflicting targets.

## Quality Checklist

- [ ] Every NFR has a unique ID (NFR-{CHAR}-{number})
- [ ] All criteria are measurable (no vague terms)
- [ ] Measurement method specified for each criterion
- [ ] Thresholds/targets are explicit
- [ ] WCAG level (A/AA/AAA) specified if accessibility applies
- [ ] OWASP WSTG baseline referenced if security applies
- [ ] SLA template filled with concrete values
- [ ] No duplicate or conflicting criteria

## Troubleshooting

| Symptom | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---------|--------------|-----|
| Vague NFRs ("fast", "secure") | Stakeholder language | Ask for quantifiable targets; suggest industry benchmarks |
| Conflicting targets | Multiple stakeholders | Use Sequential Thinking to decompose; flag for prioritization |
| Missing measurement method | Criterion not testable | Add tool/method (k6, ZAP, axe-core, etc.) |
| WCAG level unclear | Accessibility scope undefined | Default to AA; ask if AAA needed |
| OWASP scope too broad | Full WSTG is large | Use baseline scenarios; expand per risk assessment |