# Management Autopr Review > Reviews eligible generated Azure Java management-library AutoPR changes for a narrow set of high-value generation risks. - Skill: `azure-azure-sdk-for-java/management-autopr-review` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 90 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add azure-azure-sdk-for-java/management-autopr-review` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/azure-azure-sdk-for-java/management-autopr-review/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: DevOps & Infra - Author: Azure (https://skillmd.com/u/azure-azure-sdk-for-java) - Updated: 2026-09-10 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/azure-azure-sdk-for-java/management-autopr-review --- # Management AutoPR Review Rules Use only for `Azure/azure-sdk-for-java` PRs that are non-draft, target `main`, originate in the same repository, have a title containing `[AutoPR azure-resourcemanager-`, and are authored by `azure-sdk`, `azure-sdk-automation[bot]`, or `app/azure-sdk-automation`. The review is advisory. It does not approve, merge, modify code, access the spec repository, or replace other automated and human review. ## Java-change gate Never review a file whose normalized repository-relative path contains a `generated` segment (`(^|/)generated(/|$)`). This includes generated samples and tests. Review `opened`, `reopened`, and `ready_for_review` only when the PR contains a changed `.java` file outside a `generated` path. On `synchronize`, review only when the pushed `before..after` range changes such a `.java` file. POM-only, CHANGELOG-only, metadata-only, generated-only, and refresh-only pushes produce no comment. Once the Java gate passes, supporting POM, CHANGELOG, metadata, and CI files may be read as evidence, except files under a `generated` path. ## Review rules ### `MGMT-RELEASE-PLAN`: missing release-plan link - **Severity:** Warning Normalize casing and Markdown emphasis. Accept both plain `Release Plan link: https://example.com/release-plan` and formatted `**Release plan link:** [text](https://example.com/release-plan)`. Require an HTTP(S) URL. Report when the PR description contains no accepted release-plan link. Cite the PR description and continue the remaining review passes so other high-value concerns are not hidden. ### `MGMT-FOLDER`: service-folder mismatch - **Severity:** Blocking For a newly added management module, split its directory name on `-`. The expected service identity is always the third segment: `azure-resourcemanager-[-...]` Ignore the fourth and later segments when comparing the module with its `sdk//` folder. For example, `azure-resourcemanager-compute-bulkactions` belongs in `sdk/compute`. Report whenever the folder `` differs from the module's third segment. Explain that the likely source is the `service-dir` configuration in the upstream `tspconfig.yaml`, without accessing that repository. ### `MGMT-VERSION`: stable package on a preview API - **Severity:** Blocking Read all API versions from the current CHANGELOG entry. A multi-service entry may use `Package api-version : , ...`; use every value after `:` and do not treat the service-group names as versions. Fall back to `apiVersions` in the generated `_metadata.json`. When `apiVersions` is an object that maps service groups to versions, likewise use every object value. If any extracted version ends in `-preview`, the Java package version must contain a beta suffix. Report a stable package generated from any preview API, even when its other API versions are stable. Do not infer preview status from feature names or dates. ### `MGMT-API-VERSION`: generated API-version context - **Severity:** Informational Read the effective API-version set from the current CHANGELOG entry, falling back to `apiVersions` in the generated `_metadata.json`. For a CHANGELOG `service-group: version` list or an `apiVersions` object, report the distinct version values rather than the service-group names. Report the exact version or versions as review context. Treat the API-version set as the informational item's state. If a later commit changes that set, emit `MGMT-API-VERSION` again as `New` with the new values, even when a prior workflow comment already contains this ID. This provides an additional guard for `MGMT-API-VERSION-OVERLAP`. Do not request corrective action. ### `MGMT-LRO`: suspicious generated LRO response shape - **Severity:** Warning Report only when the PR newly adds a `Response` and a corresponding `Headers` model whose headers include `location` or `retry-after`. Identify the method and both generated types. Explain that the shape may indicate incorrect LRO modeling upstream. Do not report ordinary response wrappers or headers models without those headers. ### `MGMT-LIST-RETURN`: non-pageable list operation - **Severity:** Warning Review newly added user-facing public operations whose name starts with `list`. When the return type is neither `PagedIterable` nor `PagedFlux`, inspect the returned model. Report only when that model exposes a collection-valued `value` property. Identify the method, return type, and `value` element type, then ask whether the operation should expose the standard pageable shape. Do not report `listWithResponse` methods, low-level protocol client methods, private single-page helpers, or pre-existing operations. A `PagedIterable` or `PagedFlux` return is valid. Treat a response model without a `value` property as a genuine non-pageable action response. ### `MGMT-MANAGER-NAME`: suspicious management entry-point name - **Severity:** Warning Review a public top-level class ending in `Manager` only when the PR adds or renames it in the management package's root Java namespace. Report when any one of these independent signals is apparent: - a compound service name has an apparent casing boundary error, such as `ContainerserviceManager` instead of `ContainerServiceManager`; - the class name has an apparent spelling error, supported by the module name, root Java package, or other public symbols; or - the class-name stem has no meaningful lexical overlap with either the Maven module name after `azure-resourcemanager-` or the root Java package identity. For the lexical-overlap check, split CamelCase and hyphenated identities, compare case-insensitively, and allow a meaningful class token of at least four characters to occur within a combined package identity. Ignore generic tokens such as `azure`, `resource`, `resources`, `manager`, `management`, `service`, `api`, and `client`. Do not enforce exact branding, abbreviations, singular versus plural, token order, or optional suffixes. For example, `ContainerAppsApiManager` is related to `azure-resourcemanager-appcontainers`. Do not report an oddly named entry-point that was already present on the base branch. Identify the class and package evidence, then ask whether the generated entry-point name is intended. ### `MGMT-API-VERSION-OVERLAP`: overlapping API-version generations - **Severity:** Blocking Report when the branch contains package output from more than one API-version generation. Evidence includes either: - multiple package API-version lines in one release section, or - regeneration of a release section that was already dated before this PR. The likely root cause is either an earlier generated package that has not been released or multiple generation runs targeting different API versions on the same branch. Use the CHANGELOG as evidence, not as the defect itself. Ask which API-version generation should remain and whether the earlier package should be released or removed. Ordinary dependency, POM, or release metadata changes are expected. ### `MGMT-BREAKING`: generated public API break - **Severity:** Warning Use the current CHANGELOG release section as the primary and authoritative source. For a GA package version, its breaking-change section compares the release with the previous GA release and can identify a break that entered the main branch during an earlier beta. Do not require the current Java diff to contain the break. Cite the CHANGELOG file and affected release entry. Optionally cite a non-`generated` Java file when it provides useful corroboration. For a GA release, report one `MGMT-BREAKING` concern summarizing substantive breaking items listed in the current CHANGELOG section, including removed public types or methods, changed access, renamed APIs, and changed public signatures or return types. Request human confirmation that the GA breaks are intended. Do not raise `MGMT-BREAKING` for a beta package version. Beta packages may break, and their CHANGELOG comparison may be against a prior beta. Additive items are not breaking. ### `MGMT-NEW-MODULE`: new management module context - **Severity:** Informational Report when the PR adds a new `sdk//azure-resourcemanager-/pom.xml`. Identify the service folder and module so human reviewers know the PR introduces a new module and may warrant broader attention. Do not imply a defect or request corrective action. ## Verification and output Use only these severity levels: | Severity | Meaning | | --- | --- | | Blocking | A high-confidence configuration or release inconsistency that requires attention before merge. | | Warning | A suspicious generated shape or compatibility signal that needs human verification; it is not an assertion that code must be fixed. | | Informational | Useful context with no requested corrective action. | `MGMT-FOLDER`, `MGMT-VERSION`, and `MGMT-API-VERSION-OVERLAP` are Blocking. `MGMT-RELEASE-PLAN`, `MGMT-LRO`, `MGMT-LIST-RETURN`, `MGMT-MANAGER-NAME`, and `MGMT-BREAKING` are Warning. `MGMT-API-VERSION` and `MGMT-NEW-MODULE` are Informational. Every item must cite a repository-relative file and affected symbol or release entry and state whether it is `New`, `Carried forward`, or `Resolved`. Blocking and Warning items request one concrete human action or verification. Informational items provide context without requesting action. `MGMT-RELEASE-PLAN` cites the PR description. Reuse stable IDs across commits, except that a changed `MGMT-API-VERSION` value is emitted again as `New`. When a new head SHA passes the Java gate, include each still-applicable prior item as `Carried forward` in the replacement current-state comment; do not restate its question as `New`. Code-format the complete bracketed concern ID, including the square brackets, for example `[MGMT-LIST-RETURN]`. Do not wrap the complete finding in backticks, because evidence may contain its own inline code spans. Output: ```markdown ## Automated management AutoPR review - Head SHA: `` - Package: `` - Release type: `` - API version: `` - CHANGELOG: `` - Java changes reviewed: `` - Breaking changes: `` - Decision: `` ### Blocking - `[MGMT-...]` New|Carried forward|Resolved — evidence and requested action ### Warning - `[MGMT-...]` New|Carried forward|Resolved — evidence and verification request ### Informational - `[MGMT-...]` New|Carried forward|Resolved — context ``` Order sections as Blocking, Warning, Informational and omit empty sections. Silence or `noop` is correct when no review state changes.