# Posting Bitwarden Review Comments

> Use this skill when emitting inline review comments, whether posted to a GitHub pull request or written to a local file under caller-declared local-file output. Apply when formatting comments following Bitwarden engineering standards with severity emojis, clear explanations, and actionable suggestions. Use after findings are classified and ready to emit. DO NOT USE when posting summary comments.

- Skill: `bitwarden/posting-bitwarden-review-comments` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add bitwarden/posting-bitwarden-review-comments`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/bitwarden/posting-bitwarden-review-comments/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: bitwarden (https://skillmd.com/u/bitwarden)
- Updated: 2026-09-10
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/bitwarden/posting-bitwarden-review-comments

---


# Posting Bitwarden Review Comments

## Destination Detection

Check destinations **in this order** — use the first match:

| Destination                         | How to Detect                                                                                                                                                                                                         | Action                                                       |
| ----------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
| **Local output in effect**          | An `OUTPUT: local files` line in the prompt's leading directive block, **or** a caller that passes local files as the destination in effect. Check this first, and never key it on which tools happen to be available | Write to `review-inline-comments.md` in working directory    |
| Local target, no GitHub destination | The review target is local changes and no caller declared a GitHub destination                                                                                                                                        | Write to `review-inline-comments.md` in working directory    |
| GitHub pull request                 | Neither of the above                                                                                                                                                                                                  | Post via `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment` |

Under either local destination, format every finding exactly as below and write them all to the one file — do not post, whatever comment tools happen to be available.

## Comment Posting Protocol

1. **MUST** Analyze all changes before emitting anything
2. **MUST** Use inline comments for code-specific findings
3. **MUST** Use the Bitwarden finding format
4. **FORBIDDEN**: Do NOT add "Strengths", "Highlights", or positive observations sections.
5. **FORBIDDEN** Do NOT post praise-only inline comments
6. **FORBIDDEN**: Do NOT post PR metadata issues (title, description, test plan) as inline comments. These go in the summary only.

## Finding Format

**CRITICAL: Never use # followed by numbers** - GitHub will autolink it to unrelated issues/PRs.

1. Writing "#1" creates a clickable link to issue/PR #1 (not your finding)
2. "Issue" is also wrong terminology (use "Finding")
3. Use "Finding" + space + number (no # symbol); aim for under 30 words in sentence

**CORRECT FORMAT:**

- Finding 1: Memory leak detected
- Finding 2: Missing error handling

**WRONG (DO NOT USE):**

- ❌ Issue #1 (wrong term + autolink)
- ❌ #1 (autolink only)
- ❌ Issue 1 (wrong term only)

## Inline Comments

**Every inline comment MUST:**

1. Reference specific line(s)
2. State the problem - what breaks or what's the risk?
3. Provide actionable fix (for ❌ and ⚠️)
4. Be brief yet clear
5. Use collapsed sections for comments over 5 lines
6. Include both opening `<details>` AND closing `</details>` tags

**Visibility Rule:** Only severity + one-line description visible; everything else inside `<details>` tags.

### Template for long comments

```
[emoji] **[SEVERITY]**: [One-line issue description]

<details>
<summary>Details and fix</summary>

[Code example or specific fix]

[Rationale explaining why]

Reference: [docs link if applicable]
</details>
```

## Summary Output

Invoke `Skill(posting-review-summary)` for all summary formatting and posting.