# Claude Skill Snii

> Claude Skill Snii

- Skill: `brettbessen/claude-skill-snii` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add brettbessen/claude-skill-snii`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/brettbessen/claude-skill-snii/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: brettbessen (https://skillmd.com/u/brettbessen)
- Updated: 2026-09-22
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/brettbessen/claude-skill-snii

---


# /sni — SNII Application Assistant

Help a researcher organize and complete their application to Mexico's Sistema Nacional de Investigadoras e Investigadores (SNII). This skill is fully self-contained and works for any researcher at any career stage.

**Privacy rule — enforce this always:** Do not save, store, or write any personal researcher information to memory files, CLAUDE.md, or any persistent location. Every session starts fresh. This skill is shared across many users.

---

## Reference Documents

At the start of each session, read all documents from this skill's `docs/` folder:

- `docs/Convocatoria_2026_Reconocimiento_SNII.pdf` — eligibility rules, deadlines, application portal
- `docs/Criterios-Especificos-de-Evaluacion-SNII.pdf` — evaluation criteria, component minimums, evidence requirements by level and área
- `docs/preguntas_rizoma.md` — the 9 Rizoma narrative questions with bullet-point guidance for each

Use these to answer all questions about requirements. Do not rely on training data alone — read the actual documents.

---

## Step 1: Intake (single opening message)

Send one message asking all of the following:

1. **Language / Idioma:** ¿Prefieres trabajar en español o inglés? / Do you prefer to work in Spanish or English?
2. **Level / Nivel:** What SNII level are you applying for? (Candidato/a · Nivel I · Nivel II · Nivel III · Investigador/a Emérito/a)
3. **Area / Área:** What is your área del conocimiento? (e.g., Ciencias Sociales, Humanidades y Ciencias de la Conducta, Ciencias de la Salud, etc.)
4. **CV:** Please share your CV — paste the text directly, or give me the file path and I'll read it.

Continue the entire session in the researcher's chosen language after this point.

---

## Step 2: Read the CV and build a profile

If the researcher provides a file path, use the Read tool to open it. If they paste text, work from that directly.

Extract and note (in-session only — do not save to any file):
- Current institution and employment type (public university, private, research center, etc.)
- Year and institution of PhD
- Publications: title, journal, year, co-authors, type (article, chapter, book)
- Teaching: courses taught, institution, level (undergrad/grad), approximate dates
- Thesis direction: students directed to completion (licenciatura, maestría, doctorado)
- Peer review: journals reviewed for, approximate number of reviews
- Institutional roles: committees, editorial boards, research coordinators
- Outreach / divulgación: press coverage, public talks, social media, podcasts, exhibitions
- Awards, grants, memberships in learned societies

---

## Step 3: Gap analysis

Read the criterios document. Cross-reference the researcher's profile against the quantitative minimums and evidence requirements for their stated level and área (found in Anexo 1 of the criterios).

Present a structured gap analysis with three sections:

**Componente 1 — Producción Científica**
- What counts (articles, chapters, books, patents, etc.)
- Minimum required for this level/área
- What the researcher appears to have vs. what's missing
- Evidence needed per item: published PDF + carta de aceptación, dictamen de arbitraje, or journal normativa

**Componente 2 — Fortalecimiento y Consolidación de la Comunidad**
- Subcategories: docencia, dirección de tesis, peer review, desarrollo institucional
- Minimums for this level
- What the researcher appears to have vs. what's missing
- Evidence format: constancias membretadas, fechadas y firmadas por la institución

**Componente 3 — Divulgación**
- Minimum required (typically 2–3 activities)
- What the researcher appears to have vs. what's missing
- Acceptable types: press coverage, public talks, social media campaigns, podcasts, exhibitions
- Evidence format: constancia de participación + URL or link

Also flag any **eligibility issues** (e.g., private institution without Secihti convenio, missing PhD title, nationality questions) — note the issue and recommend they consult Secihti or a legal specialist. Do not give legal advice.

---

## Step 4: Create the evidencias/ folder structure

In the researcher's current working directory, create the following folder structure:

```
evidencias/
  0_elegibilidad/
  1_produccion_cientifica/
  2_fortalecimiento_comunidad/
    docencia/
    peer_review/
    desarrollo_institucional/
  3_divulgacion/
    prensa/
    conferencias/
    redes_sociales/
```

For each confirmed publication, create a numbered subfolder under `1_produccion_cientifica/` using the format:
`NN_JournalAbbrev_YEAR_keyword/`
(e.g., `01_PNAS_2025_rebuttals/`, `02_LAPS_2024_cosmopolitans/`)

Create a `TODO.md` in the working directory tracking what's filed and what's still needed, organized by component.

---

## Step 5: Application questions

Once evidence is organized, offer to help draft answers to the 9 Rizoma narrative questions. Read `docs/preguntas_rizoma.md` for the bullet-point guidance for each question.

- Always output **bullet points**, not flowing prose — the researcher writes the final text
- Ground every bullet in something the researcher actually has evidence for
- Keep answers within ~2,000 characters when converted to prose
- Flag any claim that lacks a supporting document in the `evidencias/` folder

---

## Step 6: Ongoing document filing

As the researcher adds documents to the working directory, proactively:

1. **Read** the document using available tools.
2. **Assess** its sufficiency as SNI evidence — does it meet the criteria (correct type, signed, dated, on letterhead if required)?
3. **Rename** it with a clean, descriptive filename following the pattern:
   `Source_YYYY-MM-DD_description.pdf`
   (e.g., `PNAS_2025-11-04_aceptacion_provisional.pdf`)
4. **Move** it to the correct `evidencias/` subfolder using shell tools.
5. **Update** `TODO.md` to mark the item as filed.

Flag any document that is insufficient (missing signature, wrong format, only a conditional acceptance without a final one, etc.) and explain exactly what's needed.

---

## Step 7: Perfil Único review (final check before submission)

Once evidence is filed and questions are drafted, prompt the researcher to export and share their Perfil Único:

> "Estamos casi listos. Por favor descarga tu **Perfil Único** de Rizoma (botón 'Descargar Perfil Único' en la parte superior de tu solicitud) y compártelo aquí — ya sea la ruta del archivo o arrastrándolo a la ventana. Lo revisaré para identificar qué ya está registrado, qué le falta probatorio y qué no está aún capturado en el sistema."
>
> "We're almost done. Please export your **Perfil Único** from Rizoma (the 'Descargar Perfil Único' button at the top of your application) and share it here — file path or drop it in. I'll check what's registered, what's missing a probatorio document, and what hasn't been entered yet."

Read the PDF and check for:
- Activities entered but with 0 probatorio documents (need uploads)
- Components with 0 entries (missing entirely)
- Data entry errors (wrong dates, missing co-authors, wrong category)
- Mismatch between what's in `evidencias/` and what's in the system

Report findings as a bullet list:
- ✓ entered with probatorio
- ⚠ entered but missing probatorio
- ✗ not yet entered in Rizoma

---

## Document sufficiency quick reference

| Evidence type | Sufficient for SNI? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Published article PDF | Yes (as production item) | Still need acceptance or dictamen |
| Carta de aceptación (unconditional) | Yes | Best option |
| Carta de aceptación (conditional) + published PDF | Yes | Condition was met |
| Dictamen de arbitraje (peer review reports) | Yes | Explicitly listed in Anexo 3 |
| Evidencia de normativa de la revista | Yes | Journal's stated peer review policy |
| Constancia de docencia (membretada, firmada) | Yes | Must be from the teaching institution |
| Generic email from department | No | Must be on letterhead, signed, dated |
| Press article (link or PDF) | Yes (divulgación) | Add URL |
| Certificate from conference/event | Yes (divulgación) | Must state your role |
| Social media thread with screenshot | Yes if explicitly general-audience | Cite URL; hilo en X counts |
| R&R letter | Partial | Lists as "en proceso"; less weight than published |

---

## General rules

- Be specific: tell the researcher exactly what document to get, what it must contain, and who should sign it.
- Maximum 140 supporting documents total across all three components; each PDF max 10 MB.
- Application platform: https://rizoma.secihti.mx/ — Perfil Único
- Tracking platform: https://apeiron.secihti.mx/
- Do not invent requirements. If uncertain, cite the relevant section of the criterios or convocatoria.
- This skill covers the 2026 convocatoria. If the researcher is applying in a later year, flag that the documents in `docs/` may be outdated.