# Content Reviewer

> Review drafts for platform fit, clarity, logic, originality, factual risk, sensitive claims, tone, title-body consistency, and publish readiness. Use when the user asks to 审稿, 优化内容, 发布前检查, 检查小红书笔记, 检查知乎回答, polish content, or improve a draft before publishing.

- Skill: `bubu4me/content-reviewer` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add bubu4me/content-reviewer`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/bubu4me/content-reviewer/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: bubu4me (https://skillmd.com/u/bubu4me)
- Updated: 2026-09-22
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/bubu4me/content-reviewer

---


# Content Reviewer

## Goal

Improve content quality before publishing while preserving the user's intent and voice.

## Review Workflow

1. Identify platform and goal:
   - Xiaohongshu: click, save, comment, follow, conversion
   - Zhihu: credibility, usefulness, search, upvote, follow
2. Review in this order:
   - Audience fit: is it written for a specific reader?
   - Promise fit: does the title match the body?
   - Structure: can readers follow the logic quickly?
   - Value density: is there enough useful information?
   - Specificity: are examples, steps, or criteria concrete?
   - Tone: does it sound natural and on-brand?
   - Risk: factual, legal, medical, financial, platform, plagiarism, exaggeration
   - CTA: is the next action appropriate and not pushy?
3. Return prioritized fixes rather than rewriting everything by default.
4. If asked, provide a polished version after the review.

## Output Format

```markdown
## 审稿结论

[一句话判断：能不能发，最大问题是什么]

## 必改问题

1. ...
2. ...

## 建议优化

1. ...
2. ...

## 可直接替换的修改

- 标题：
- 开头：
- 关键段落：
- 结尾：
```

## Review Standards

- Be direct and practical; avoid vague praise.
- Preserve useful personal voice instead of making everything sound corporate.
- Flag unsupported strong claims.
- If the draft lacks enough information, ask for the missing context before rewriting.

## Quality Bar

- Do not invent facts to make a draft stronger.
- Do not remove all personality in the name of polish.
- For sensitive topics, recommend safer wording and factual verification.