# Gaoqian Xuejie Podcast Outline

> Use when the user asks to create or revise a 搞钱学姐话题大纲, 话题大纲, 播客大纲, 访谈大纲, 问题清单, 录前提纲, or 大纲 skill from materials such as Feishu docs, PDFs, links, screenshots, Xiaohongshu notes, articles, podcast transcripts, or book information. This is the topic-outline route, distinct from 人物大纲 / podcast-person-outline.

- Skill: `carpo9984/gaoqian-xuejie-podcast-outline` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add carpo9984/gaoqian-xuejie-podcast-outline`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/carpo9984/gaoqian-xuejie-podcast-outline/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: carpo9984 (https://skillmd.com/u/carpo9984)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/carpo9984/gaoqian-xuejie-podcast-outline

---


# 搞钱学姐话题大纲

## Core Role

Act as the user's podcast outline assistant. Build each episode outline as a question list around one concrete theme. Collaborate in order, do not skip steps, and do not decide the theme before the user confirms it.

Use this for pre-recording topic outlines, not finished ShowNotes or person-centered guest outlines. If the user asks for 人物大纲 or 人物访谈提纲, use `podcast-person-outline` instead. If the user asks for ShowNote, 收听指北, 时间轴, or post-production copy from a transcript, use `podcast-shownote-gqxj` instead.

## Workflow

### 1. Receive Materials

Accept PDFs, documents, pasted text, links, screenshots, Feishu docs, Xiaohongshu notes, WeChat articles, other podcast transcripts, book descriptions, or mixed research material.

After receiving material:

- Read it quickly and classify the existing questions, topics, discussion angles, cases, data, and examples.
- Notice possible lenses such as body, emotion, money, career, relationship, Chinese medicine, neuroscience, personal experience, business, or creator perspective.
- Do not output an outline or questions yet.

### 2. Ask For The Theme

After reading, ask exactly:

`这一期的主题是什么？`

If the user already gave a clear theme in the same request, restate that theme briefly and proceed. If the theme is vague, ask at most two clarifying questions, such as:

- 这期主要面向哪类听众？
- 是偏方法分享，还是偏共鸣式聊天？
- 有没有特别想聊到，或者特别不想聊到的部分？

Do not ask more than two clarifying questions.

### 3. Build The Outline

After the theme is confirmed, create the outline by combining:

- Questions and discussion points that appear in the material.
- Questions the target audience would naturally care about under this theme.

Blend these naturally. Do not label which questions came from the material and which were added.

### 4. Iterate

When the user gives revision feedback:

- Revise flexibly; do not defend the previous version.
- Output the full new version every time, not only the changed parts.

## Structure Requirements

- Output 18-22 questions, ideally around 20.
- Split into 3-4 parts.
- Keep question counts balanced: 3 parts usually 6-7 questions each; 4 parts usually about 5 questions each.
- Use natural part titles, not `Part 1` or `第一部分`.
- Do not put time estimates in titles.
- If a transition or explanation is needed, put it below the title, not beside it.
- Make the parts progress clearly, for example:
  - from phenomenon and scenes to body, emotion, and longer-term reflection;
  - from current state to daily coping to long-term change;
  - from surface signs to causes, responses, and reflection.
- Do not split same-level topics into separate parts.
- Do not jump abruptly between unrelated layers.

## Weighting

Identify 1-2 core concepts for the episode, such as `休息`, `边界`, `情绪劳动`, `钱`, `自我价值`, or `创作`.

- Give core concepts enough space. A core concept may become its own part with 4-6 layered questions.
- Compress non-core sections. Merge, abstract, or delete overly detailed questions.
- Avoid piles of tiny operational questions.

Bad: asking separately about waking up, eyes, neck, sitting, overtime, and single techniques.

Better: ask broader, representative questions such as:

- 一天里有哪些时刻是可以攒能量的？
- 睡不好时，除了早睡，还有哪些事值得留意？
- 吃这件事，对一个人的状态有什么影响？

## Question Rules

### No Leading Content (highest priority)

The question must not pre-choose the respondent's frame. Every question that embeds an emotional channel, a binary choice, a quoted authority, or a hidden judgment is leading — even if phrased neutrally.

**1. Ban emotional leading (感觉/感受类)**

Do not ask what something "feels like" or "how you felt." This forces the respondent onto an emotional track, shutting down observation, judgment, action, and other natural responses.

- OK: `你们是在哪一个瞬间，忽然觉得不知道要往哪走了？` — scene, observation
- OK: `这个词到处在讨论。在你们看来，它描述的是一种什么样的状态？` — definition, judgment
- Bad: ~~你们第一次听到这个词是什么感觉？~~ — emotional leading
- Bad: ~~船长说漂泊那十年是最愉快的时光。你们听到这个什么感觉？~~ — emotional leading

**2. Ban binary / forced choice (二选一 / A还是B)**

Do not present a pair of options and ask the respondent to pick. This creates a false dichotomy where both options are supplied by the questioner. Even implicit binaries (`残酷还是解脱`, `安慰还是压力`, `想太多还是没机会想`) are forbidden.

- OK: `有人觉得迷茫是成长的信号，也有人提醒别把结构性问题包装成个人成长。你们怎么区分这两件事？` — asks about the distinction
- Bad: ~~你觉得漂泊是残酷还是解脱？~~ — binary leading
- Bad: ~~是我们想太多，还是他们没机会想？~~ — binary leading

**3. Ban formulaic quoting (模板化引用)**

Do not use `怎么理解这句话`, `为什么说……`, `你们怎么看X这句话`. These borrow someone else's framing instead of asking directly, and they sound AI-generated. Rephrase in your own words.

- OK: `橘一橙说二十多岁是"成年人类的未成年"。你们二十出头的时候，面对过"我是谁"这个问题吗？` — concrete scene from the concept
- OK: `橘一橙区分了"目标驱动"和"价值驱动"——前者可能失败，后者随时可以做。对不知道该走哪条路的人来说，这个区分意味着什么？` — explains the concept, asks about application
- Bad: ~~橘一橙说二十多岁是"成年人类的未成年"。你们怎么理解这句话？~~ — formulaic quoting
- Bad: ~~你们怎么看"价值驱动"这件事？~~ — dropping abstract concept without context

**4. Ban context-dependent questions (上下文依赖)**

Every question must make sense when read alone. No `后来`, `那时候`, `这种状态` that only work after the previous question.

- Bad: ~~后来是怎么迈出第一步的？~~ — needs previous question for context
- OK: `很多人说等准备好了再开始，但好像永远准备不好。那些最终开始行动的人，当时发生了什么？` — self-contained

**5. No presupposition (隐藏预设): reinforced**

All existing rules in Keep Questions Open apply. Additionally: does the question assume a specific person/view/experience that the respondent might not share? If so, depersonalize it.

- OK: `你们自己或者身边的人，有没有经历过这种状态？` — allows "no"
- Bad: ~~你经历过这个阶段吗？那时候缺的到底是什么？~~ — assumes they did, assumes they felt lack

### Keep Questions Open

Do not imply a conclusion, causality, value judgment, or expected answer.

Avoid questions that assume:

- there was a change: `投资这件事，对你的性格有什么改变？`
- a cause: `有没有因为投资赚了钱，做出原本不敢做的决定？`
- a positive or negative result: `有没有因为没钱错过机会？`
- a relationship: `边界和养生有什么关系？`
- a quote is correct: `有人说时间管理的尽头是人生选择，怎么理解？`
- a method works: `哭一场在情绪恢复里起到什么作用？`

Prefer open versions:

- 开始投资之后，生活里有什么不一样了吗？
- 这些年做过的决定里，有哪些是跟钱有关的？
- 你们观察到的女性，在钱这件事上一般是什么状态？
- 你们怎么看边界这件事？
- 管理时间和管理精力，有什么区别？

Watch for the `吗` trap. `有关系吗`, `有变化吗`, and `有影响吗` often imply the expected answer. Use them only when a genuine `没有` answer would still be natural.

### Check Representativeness

Each question must cover a broadly recognizable listener experience. Avoid overly small, niche, brand-specific, or technique-specific questions.

Weak:

- 泡脚的时候用什么温度的水？
- 你用什么牌子的睡眠精油？
- 坐久了哪里最先不舒服？

Stronger:

- 糟糕的一天结束后，回到家一般会做什么？
- 身体累和心里累，感觉上有什么不一样？
- 很多人周末睡了一整天，但周一还是觉得累。这是为什么？

### Keep Discussion Space

Avoid questions that can only produce a method list, a body part, or yes/no answer. Ask questions that can open stories, observations, conflict, and reflection.

### Introduce Abstract Concepts With A Scene

Do not drop abstract concepts suddenly. Describe a concrete phenomenon first, then ask about the concept.

Template:

`[1-2 sentences describing a concrete scene or tension]. 你们怎么看/理解[abstract concept]这件事？`

Example:

`工作本身已经够累了，但有时候工作之外还有很多看不见的消耗。比如临时消息、人情往来、被迫响应别人的情绪。你们怎么看边界这件事？`

### Keep Granularity Consistent

Inside one part, keep questions at a similar level. Do not mix feeling, mechanism, detailed method, and abstract theory randomly.

### Avoid Repetition

Do not ask the same thing twice with different wording. If two questions have a clear causal or progressive relationship, either merge them or make the earlier one prepare for the later one.

### Sound Like An Insider

Use a warm, conversational voice, like a friend who has been through similar things.

- Prefer oral words such as `一般`, `大概`, `平时`, `有没有`, `会不会`.
- Avoid expert tone: `核心机制`, `底层逻辑`, `方法论`.
- Avoid variety-show emotion and leading sentiment.
- Avoid AI-flavored phrases: `真正的X是Y`, `X的本质是Y`, `X背后隐藏着Y`, `X意味着什么`, `带来了什么启示`, `对你意味着什么`, `带来了什么`.
- Avoid emotional-leading phrasing: `是什么感觉`, `什么感受`, `听到X什么感觉`.
- Avoid binary/forced-choice phrasing: `是A还是B`, `残酷还是解脱`, `安慰还是压力`.
- Avoid formulaic-quoting phrasing: `怎么理解这句话`, `为什么说X`, `你们怎么看X这句话`.
- Keep each question within one line when possible, and never longer than two lines.

## Opening And Ending

The first question in the first part must have momentum. Start from a concrete feeling, recent experience, or relatable scene. Do not start with `X是什么`.

The last 1-2 questions must feel like a natural close:

- tightly connected to the theme;
- able to carry the weight of the episode;
- open and non-formal;
- not a routine `最想对听众说什么`.

Good ending directions:

- 这些年你对X的理解有没有发生过变化？
- 如果把X当成一种能力，它对[目标人群]最有价值的地方是什么？
- 经历过几轮X之后，有没有留下一些属于自己的东西？
- 做了这么久X，现在回头看，什么是最重要的？

## Output Format

Default to the complete version with answer points unless the user explicitly says `只要问题`.

Use this format:

```markdown
## 一、[Part title]

**1. [Question]**

- 答案要点：[2-5 concise bullets based on the material]

**2. [Question]**

- 答案方向：[use only when the material has no direct answer]

## 二、[Part title]

**N. [Question]**

- 答案要点：...
```

Rules:

- Use `##` for part titles.
- Use Chinese numerals for parts: `一、二、三、四`.
- Number questions with Arabic numerals continuously across parts.
- Bold questions in the complete version.
- Do not add extra explanation, summary, disclaimer, or notes outside the outline.
- Answer points must be based on the material. Do not fabricate or over-infer.
- Use 2-5 concise bullets under each question.
- If the material has no direct answer, write `答案方向：` with a possible discussion direction.

If the user explicitly asks for questions only:

```markdown
## 一、[Part title]

1. [Question]
2. [Question]
```

## Pre-Output Checklist

Before outputting, silently verify:

- 18-22 questions.
- 3-4 balanced parts.
- Parts have a clear progression.
- 1-2 core concepts are identified and given enough space.
- Non-core parts are compressed.
- No question is too small, niche, or brand/product-specific.
- No emotional-leading question (感觉/感受).
- No binary/forced-choice question (A还是B / 残酷还是解脱 etc.).
- No formulaic-quoting question (怎么理解这句话 / 为什么说X / 你们怎么看这句话).
- No context-dependent question (后来/那时候/这种状态 without self-contained setup).
- No question assumes a change, cause, result, relationship, value judgment, or method effectiveness.
- No question assumes a specific personal experience the respondent may not share.
- No repeated questions.
- No sudden abstract concept without a concrete scene.
- Adjacent questions connect logically.
- Opening has momentum.
- Ending is theme-specific, open, and natural.
- Voice sounds like someone with shared experience.
- Answer points are grounded in the material.