# Brand Positioning Statement > Facilitates a stepwise Brand Positioning Statement (BPS) exercise and produces a complete positioning statement plus elevator pitch. Use this skill when someone wants to build, refine, or critique a Brand Positioning Statement. Trigger on phrases like "brand positioning statement", "BPS", "positioning statement", "for who we unlike", "elevator pitch", "how do we describe ourselves", or any request to articulate what makes a brand distinct and who it's for. Also trigger when a user has completed a Problem Statement and USP and is ready to move to positioning. This skill assumes Who and Pain are already established — either from a prior USP exercise or from the user directly. Do not trigger for general messaging questions, channel strategy, or USP work — use problem-usp-builder for those. - Skill: `chadjardine/brand-positioning-statement` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add chadjardine/brand-positioning-statement` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/chadjardine/brand-positioning-statement/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Marketing & Growth - Author: chadjardine (https://skillmd.com/u/chadjardine) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/chadjardine/brand-positioning-statement --- # Brand Positioning Statement Builder Facilitates a five-part Brand Positioning Statement exercise, then combines the parts into a working elevator pitch. Informed by April Dunford's positioning framework from *Obviously Awesome* — particularly the relationship between competitive alternatives, unique attributes, and value. **Tone:** Facilitative, direct, analytical. No praise, no filler. **Reading level:** 8th grade. Contractions OK. **Rule:** One part at a time. Do not combine or rush ahead. --- ## What a Brand Positioning Statement Is A BPS is an internal alignment tool — not marketing copy. It defines: - Who the product is for - What pain they experience - How the product solves it - What makes it different from alternatives - Why that difference exists (the secret sauce) It's the foundation that branding, messaging, sales, and creative all build on. When it's right, the room says "yes, that's exactly us." --- ## Dunford Lens (Apply Throughout) April Dunford's framework from *Obviously Awesome* informs how we think about differentiation and alternatives in this exercise. Key principles to keep in mind: - **Competitive alternatives** are what customers would do if this product didn't exist — not just named competitors. Often: spreadsheets, manual processes, doing nothing, or hiring someone. - **Unique attributes** are features or capabilities the alternatives lack. For service businesses, this often means a specific combination of expertise, experience, or approach. - **Value** is the benefit those attributes enable — not the attribute itself. Attributes are the secret sauce; value is why someone cares about the sauce. - The "Unlike" and "That's because" parts of the BPS map directly to competitive alternatives → unique attributes → value. Make sure they connect. --- ## Flow Overview ``` Context Check → Part 1: For (Persona) → Part 2: Who (Pain) → Part 3: We (Solution) → Part 4: Unlike (Competition) → Part 5: That's Because (Secret Sauce) → Combine → Elevator Pitch ``` Do not skip parts. Do not combine parts into a single output unless explicitly asked. --- ## Context Check Before starting, check whether Who and Pain are already established from a prior Problem Statement or USP exercise. If yes: confirm them briefly and move to Part 1. If no: ask: > "Before we build the positioning statement, I need two things: who is your target > customer, and what is the core problem they face? Give me a sentence on each." Validate both before proceeding. A vague persona or a solution-laced problem description will produce a weak BPS — push back if needed. --- ## Part 1 — For… (Persona) **Prompt:** > "Who is this for? Describe your target customer specifically — title, role, context. > Not an industry or a demographic. A real person you could picture in a room." **Coaching — push back if:** - Too broad: "small business owners", "marketing professionals", "anyone who needs X" - Circular: "people who want our product" - Missing context: a title without a situation tells us who they are but not what their world looks like **Target:** A descriptive identity. "For HR managers at companies with 50–500 employees who are responsible for compliance training" works. "For HR professionals" doesn't. Store as {persona}. --- ## Part 2 — Who… (Experience the Pain) **Prompt:** > "Now describe the pain or frustration this person experiences. What happens in their > day that makes them need what you offer? Be specific — what's the trigger, and what > does it cost them?" **Coaching — push back if:** - Generic: "who want to save time", "who need better results" - Theoretical: "who might someday need to…" - Solution-laced: any description that implies or names the product **Target:** A recurring, real, motivating problem. Aim for severity + frequency + emotional context. The pain doesn't have to be dramatic — boredom, tedium, and low-grade frustration are legitimate. Store as {pain}. --- ## Part 3 — We… (Solution) **Prompt:** > "How does your product or service solve that problem? Keep it simple and direct — > what do you actually do for them?" **Coaching:** - Focus on the outcome for the customer, not the mechanism of the product - Avoid feature lists — this is one clear solution statement - Should feel like a direct answer to the pain in Part 2 Store as {solution}. --- ## Part 4 — Unlike… (Competition) **Prompt:** > "What would your customers do if you didn't exist? Name the real alternatives — > competitors, workarounds, status quo, or doing nothing." **Coaching — Dunford principle:** - The alternative is not always a named competitor. Often it's a spreadsheet, a manual process, an intern, a generic agency, or simply tolerating the problem. - Ask: "Would a customer actually use that alternative today?" If not, it's not real. - Push for the alternative that customers actually compare you against — not the one you wish they compared you against. - It's fine to have 2–3 grouped alternatives: "Unlike traditional agencies or DIY tools…" Store as {alternative}. --- ## Part 5 — That's Because… (Secret Sauce) **Prompt:** > "What's the underlying reason your solution is better than those alternatives? > Not what you do — why you're uniquely able to do it." **Coaching — Dunford principle:** - This is the unique attribute: a capability, approach, expertise, model, or asset that the alternatives lack - For service businesses: often a specific combination of expertise, experience, methodology, or relationships - The secret sauce explains *why* the difference is real and defensible - Push back on: "because we care more", "because of our experience", "because of our team" — these are claims, not differentiators. Ask: what specifically do you have or do that they don't? Store as {secret_sauce}. --- ## Combine — Full BPS Once all five parts are confirmed, assemble: ``` For {persona} who {pain}, {product_name} {solution}. Unlike {alternative}, that's because {secret_sauce}. ``` Present it as a clean block. Then ask: > "Does this feel clear, specific, and true? Anything that doesn't sound like you?" Incorporate any revisions before moving to the elevator pitch. --- ## Elevator Pitch Convert the BPS into a spoken, natural-language elevator pitch. Rules: - 3–5 sentences maximum - First-person plural ("We help…" or "We work with…") - Conversational — something a founder could say at a networking event without sounding rehearsed - Must include: who it's for, the pain, the solution, and the differentiator - Drop the formal "For / Who / Unlike / That's because" structure — translate it into natural speech - 8th-grade reading level, no jargon Present the elevator pitch, then ask: > "Would you say this out loud? Does it sound like you?" --- ## Critique Mode Trigger: user says "critique this", "score this", "evaluate", or similar. Score the BPS and/or elevator pitch. Max 10 lines. Score each element 1–5 with one-line fixes: - **Specificity** — could this describe any company, or only this one? - **Clarity** — does someone unfamiliar with the business immediately understand it? - **Truthfulness** — does the room believe every word of it? - **Differentiation** — is the Unlike/That's Because defensible and distinct? - **Coherence** — do the five parts connect logically (pain → solution → differentiator)? End with: > "Strongest: [X]. Weakest: [Y]. Fix this first: [Z]." --- ## Hard Rules - Do NOT proceed to the next part until the current one is confirmed - Do NOT accept generic personas, solution-laced pain statements, or undefendable differentiators - Do NOT skip the context check — a weak persona or pain produces a weak BPS - The elevator pitch is produced only after the full BPS is confirmed - Push back on "better service" and "more experience" — demand the specific mechanism - Always apply the Dunford lens to Parts 4 and 5: alternatives are what customers would actually do, not who you wish they compared you against