# Audit Agent Documentation > Audit and improve repository agent documentation without weakening project contracts. - Skill: `christofferbergj/audit-agent-documentation` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 5 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add christofferbergj/audit-agent-documentation` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/christofferbergj/audit-agent-documentation/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: AI & ML - Author: christofferbergj (https://skillmd.com/u/christofferbergj) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/christofferbergj/audit-agent-documentation --- # Audit Agent Documentation Treat the repository's agent guidance as a **documentation graph**. Entry points, scoped guidance, routed references, skills, setup outputs, generators, and discovery adapters are nodes; inheritance, pointers, generation, and consumer dependencies are edges. Each task receives one effective **instruction stack** through that graph. Treat every node consumed by a workflow as a **contract**, even when it looks like ordinary prose. Infer the authorization mode from the request: - **Audit** — diagnose and propose changes without editing. - **Improve** — the default; audit, make focused edits, and validate them. - **Publish** — improve, then use the standard ready-PR workflow in Step 8. Explicit user instructions may override its target or publication path when repository guidance permits. ## 1. Establish authority and boundaries Resolve the repository root, current worktree and branch, initial status, first-party workspace boundaries, and the instruction files that govern the task. Read applicable user-level, root, and scoped agent instructions from the broadest scope to the most specific scope before examining candidates for change. Derive workspace boundaries from authoritative manifests and configuration rather than directory-name guesses. Mark existing user changes as protected. Record every explicit setup, generation, source-management, publication, and ownership rule that constrains agent documentation. When the repository has multiple first-party workspaces or distinct nested instruction scopes, read [`references/MONOREPO-GRAPH.md`](references/MONOREPO-GRAPH.md) completely before inventorying them. **Complete when:** the governing instruction chain, initial worktree boundary, every first-party workspace, and every protected or source-managed surface are identified. ## 2. Inventory the documentation graph Search by role across every agent-documentation convention present. Account for: - Root and nested entry points such as `AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, and ecosystem-specific instruction surfaces. - Documents, context maps, coding standards, and information-access instructions reached from those entry points. - Repository-local skills and installed skills that the repository invokes, configures, or retains setup outputs for, including their setup skills, templates, routed references, and discovery adapters. - Setup outputs, provenance or lock manifests, generated guidance, automated documentation checks, and the sources or commands that own them. - Nearby documentation and repository examples that reveal local conventions. Exclude dependencies, build output, and vendored examples unless the repository deliberately exposes them to agents. For each node, record its scope, consumer, load condition, owner or source, and authoritative replacement path. For each edge, record what loads, points to, generates, mirrors, or consumes what. In a monorepo, map every first-party workspace to an effective instruction stack; group workspaces only when their stacks and consumers are identical. Keep the graph as working notes unless the user requests an artifact. **Complete when:** every discovered entry point, routed document, first-party workspace, and downstream consumer is accounted for; every edge required to understand their contracts has been followed; and the search boundary is explicit. ## 3. Verify documentation against reality Treat each factual claim and graph edge as a hypothesis. Verify relevant paths, inheritance and pointer targets, scripts, command fields, workspace boundaries, required headings or values, conditional sections, generated-file repair paths, symlink targets, and architecture claims against repository evidence or a safe live check. Use the repository's prescribed documentation lookup tool when external technical documentation is needed. Use history and nearby examples when intent or ownership is unclear. For source-managed material, verify its provenance and refresh mechanism; route improvements through that mechanism or classify them as upstream work. When a skill or tool reads or writes repository agent documentation, read [`references/CONSUMER-CONTRACTS.md`](references/CONSUMER-CONTRACTS.md) completely before judging those nodes. **Complete when:** every suspected defect, proposed factual change, and consumer-critical edge has current evidence, and every unverifiable claim or contract is recorded as a gap rather than filled from memory. ## 4. Diagnose the merged stack Read [`references/AUDIT-RUBRIC.md`](references/AUDIT-RUBRIC.md) completely, then apply every section to the graph as a whole and to each distinct effective instruction stack. In a monorepo, map every first-party workspace to one evaluated stack even when identical stacks are evaluated once. Classify each candidate: - **Keep** — correct, useful, well-scoped, and worth its context. - **Add** — a verified missing invariant, gotcha, route, or repair path has meaningful leverage. - **Repair** — useful intent has stale facts, vague wording, a broken command, or a missing discovery seam. - **Narrow** — valid guidance belongs in a smaller scope. - **Route** — useful detail belongs behind a precise pointer. - **Merge** — multiple rules express one contract and need one source. - **Remove** — obsolete, contradicted, or behaviorally inert. - **Conflict** — applicable authorities disagree and repository evidence does not resolve the choice safely. - **Upstream** — improvement belongs in a generated, vendored, locked, or externally maintained source. **Complete when:** every candidate has evidence, ownership, a classification, and either a justified destination or a justified decision to leave it unchanged. ## 5. Choose a focused change set Select the smallest coherent set that preserves project-specific intent and required workflow semantics. Prioritize changes in this order: 1. Incorrect, stale, contradictory, unsafe, or undiscoverable guidance. 2. Always-loaded context that obscures higher-value instructions. 3. Vague direction that needs an actionable positive path. 4. Pure editorial preference, which normally stays unchanged. **Complete when:** each planned edit has a concrete behavioral benefit, a verified basis, and the narrowest reliable owner and scope. ## 6. Execute the authorized mode In **Audit** mode, leave the filesystem unchanged and turn the focused change set into an evidence-backed proposal. In **Improve** or **Publish** mode, when the change set creates or edits any agent-consumed document, invoke `/writing-for-agents` before drafting the first change and apply its guidance to every changed document. Make the smallest coherent edits that realize the plan: - Correct verified facts without changing the workflow they serve. - Replace vague prohibitions with the desired action and repair path; retain hard guardrails where safety or contract integrity requires them. - Prefer stable capabilities and domain concepts over brittle file tours. - Link to authoritative source, code, or generated output instead of copying volatile detail. - Preserve one canonical source and use the repository's supported discovery mechanism for other consumers. - Preserve downstream consumer contracts and selected project values; repair them through their owning setup source or template. - Apply generated or source-managed changes through their owning source and refresh path; leave a precise upstream finding when that path is outside the task's authority. **Complete when:** Audit mode has a complete proposal and an unchanged filesystem; Improve or Publish mode has only intended agent-documentation changes, with `/writing-for-agents` applied to every changed agent-consumed document, protected semantics and user work intact, each meaning owned by one source, and every downstream consumer edge preserved. ## 7. Validate as a future agent In Audit mode, use read-only checks, record mutation-capable gates as unrun, and confirm the final filesystem status matches the initial status. In Improve or Publish mode, read every changed document end to end. Then re-read every affected effective stack and exercise every changed graph edge. For each first-party workspace and instruction convention not otherwise covered, sample at least one unaffected task path. Verify that: - Local links, anchors, paths, symlinks, discovery entry points, and consumer reads resolve. - Commands and repair paths work in their documented context. - Scope and precedence are unambiguous, with no new contradiction or orphaned reference. - Generated or source-managed integrity checks pass. - Repository formatting, documentation, and validation gates pass, followed by `git diff --check` and a final status review. Use an independent reviewer when available; otherwise begin a fresh rubric-based pass after the draft is complete. Record exact blockers and unrun checks. **Complete when:** every changed or proposed claim, route, and consumer edge has been exercised or marked unverified; every first-party workspace maps to a validated stack; every applicable gate has a recorded result; and the final status matches the authorized mode and focused change set. ## 8. Report and publish if authorized Lead with the outcome. Summarize: - What changed or is proposed, and which agent behavior it improves. - Graph coverage across workspaces, instruction scopes, and downstream consumers. - Important guidance deliberately retained, especially project-specific and setup-owned contracts. - Conflicts, source gaps, or upstream work left unresolved. - Validation performed, checks still pending, and whether hosted checks are settled or unknown. A clean audit may produce no edits. Reassess the current repository and history on later runs instead of treating a prior audit as current truth. In **Publish** mode, treat the request to publish as authorization for this standard workflow after local validation: 1. Resolve the repository's hosting remote and default branch from current state. 2. Put the intended changes on a non-default branch, following repository branch and commit guidance while preserving unrelated user work. 3. Commit the validated change and push that branch. 4. Open a ready pull request targeting the default branch, following repository templates and review guidance. An explicit user instruction may select another base branch, request a draft pull request, omit a publication boundary, or choose another publication path. Push directly to the default branch only when the user explicitly requests it and repository guidance permits it. If an override conflicts with repository guidance or available authority, stop at the last safe completed boundary and report the exact blocker. Record the branch, target base, resulting pull-request URL or state, and whether hosted checks are settled or pending. **Complete when:** the user can distinguish verified improvements, intentional non-changes, unresolved boundaries, and validation status without the hidden working notes, and the standard ready pull request or explicitly requested override is complete or has an exact blocker.