# Claude Vs Openai Pr Review

> Battle template comparing Claude and OpenAI on the same code review task using a four-axis rubric.

- Skill: `conectlens/claude-vs-openai-pr-review` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add conectlens/claude-vs-openai-pr-review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/conectlens/claude-vs-openai-pr-review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Productivity
- Author: conectlens (https://skillmd.com/u/conectlens)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/conectlens/claude-vs-openai-pr-review

---


# Claude vs OpenAI — Pull Request Review

A reusable battle template that takes the `code-reviewer` lens, hands it to both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-4o on the same diff, and lets voters score the outputs against the Code Quality Rubric.

## Why this exists

Most developers form a model preference based on tone, not signal. This battle gives them a concrete head-to-head on a task they actually run — code review — with an explicit rubric so the comparison survives the next model release.

## How to fork

`fn_create_battle` clones the structural fields and rotates contender slots by one. Forking is intended:

- Change the rubric for a stricter house standard.
- Swap one contender for a local Ollama model.
- Change the input diff to your team's repo.

## Forkability check

Forking is enforced by:

- [`fn_battles_create_rematch`](../../../supabase/schema.sql) — clones a terminal-state battle into a new draft with `parent_battle_id` set.
- `parent_battle_id` on `battles.battles` — preserves lineage so a fork tree is queryable.