# Brand Positioning

> Product positioning, customer-research-driven messaging and website copy, and brand identity briefs, informed by the work of April Dunford, Georgiana Laudi, Claire Suellentrop, Michael Johnson and Alina Wheeler. Use when positioning or repositioning a product, choosing a market category or target segment, planning customer or JTBD research, writing or rewriting homepage, landing-page or sales copy, a value proposition or tagline, naming a product or company, briefing a rebrand, logo, visual identity or brand architecture decision, or critiquing existing positioning, messaging, a name or a brand against expert criteria. Not for ad campaigns, SEO, or channel/growth tactics.

- Skill: `connorads/brand-positioning` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 5 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add connorads/brand-positioning`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/connorads/brand-positioning/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Marketing & Growth
- Author: connorads (https://skillmd.com/u/connorads)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/connorads/brand-positioning

---


# Brand positioning

Every brand artefact sits on three layers:

> **EVIDENCE** (what best customers actually did and said)
> → **STRATEGY** (positioning, the chosen Job, brand definition - derived from
> evidence in a fixed order)
> → **EXPRESSION** (copy, name, visual identity - expressing the strategy).

Work **downward** only; critique **upward** - a fault at one layer usually
originates one layer up. Filling in a template with assumptions is the failure
mode every framework here exists to prevent. Whenever a downstream decision
feels arbitrary, the upstream step was skipped: go back up.

## Standing rules (hold for the whole session)

1. **Never output the classic one-sentence positioning-statement template**
   ("For [target], X is a [category] that…") as a positioning deliverable. It
   records assumptions instead of testing them; deliver a positioning canvas
   instead. The sales-story category line (messaging.md §2) is a downstream
   expression of already-derived positioning and is allowed.
2. **Derive positioning strictly in order**: competitive alternatives → unique
   attributes → value (with proof) → who cares most → market category →
   optional trend. Starting anywhere else imports a frame customers don't
   share.
3. **"Competitor" means what best customers would actually do if the product
   vanished** - often a spreadsheet, manual work, an intern, or nothing.
4. **Real data or declared hypothesis.** Ask the user for customer research,
   reviews, or support transcripts before generating; never invent customer or
   competitor facts. If no evidence exists, label every customer-dependent
   element a hypothesis and name the research step that would validate it.
5. **Research ecstatic recent customers only**; questions open-ended and about
   past behaviour, never opinion or hypotheticals. Customers' verbatim words
   become the copy.
6. **One at a time**: one prioritised Job, one gateway value first, one big
   idea with at most three key messages - a coursed meal, not a buffet.
7. **Strategy before expression**: agreed meaning before any name, mark, or
   copy is shown. Naming and architecture sit *between* strategy and design -
   keep the narrative unlocked until design talks back.
8. **Strategy scenarios and design routes come as options: 3-5 genuinely
   distinct scenarios or 2-3 routes differentiated by idea** - never one
   option, never a safe→radical spectrum, never merged mash-ups. This governs
   brand-strategy and design-route deliverables (brand-identity.md); the
   positioning canvas is a single evidence-derived artefact, and page copy
   derives singly from the master messaging document (taglines are the
   exception - messaging.md §7).
9. **Provable claims only.** "Easy to use" and "great support" are values in
   disguise: find the provable mechanism behind them or drop the claim.
10. **Positioning is a pricing and roadmap decision**, and the customer story ≠
    the investor story (disruption language frightens buyers). Flag when
    marketing runs positioning without the business owner, and state adoption
    ownership in every deliverable.

## Routing

| Task involves… | Read |
|---|---|
| Positioning or repositioning, market category choice, competitive alternatives, target segment, positioning canvas, repositioning triggers | [references/positioning.md](references/positioning.md) |
| Planning or analysing customer/JTBD research, interview scripts, survey design, choosing the priority Job | [references/customer-research.md](references/customer-research.md) |
| Homepage/landing/sales copy, value propositions, messaging docs, the sales story, taglines, tone of voice | [references/messaging.md](references/messaging.md) |
| Brand strategy/definition: purpose, values, personality, big idea; naming, rebrand or logo briefs, visual identity direction, brand architecture, design route selection | [references/brand-identity.md](references/brand-identity.md) |

Most real tasks read two files: the layer being produced plus its upstream
layer (copy → messaging + customer-research; positioning → positioning +
customer-research; brand identity → brand-identity + positioning). Multi-part
tasks work the table top-down.

## Critique mode

When reviewing an existing artefact:

1. Identify its layer and run the **Critique checklist** at the end of the
   matching reference. Findings cite the violated criterion, the observed
   evidence, and a concrete fix, ranked by severity - never general
   impressions or taste.
2. Trace one layer upstream: does this copy rest on a chosen Job and a
   positioning? Does this positioning rest on real alternatives from real
   customers? **A missing upstream layer is the primary finding.**
3. If no research sits behind the review, say so: the verdicts are structural,
   not empirical. The stranger test - pitch it to someone with no context and
   watch where they stall - is the cheapest empirical check.

Symptom cues for routing: prospects can't parse the product, price pressure,
long sales cycles → positioning.md. Page converts poorly or reads generic →
messaging.md. Doubts about a name, mark, or architecture → brand-identity.md.

## Scope boundary

This is not a channel or growth-tactics playbook: tactics without customer
insight is petri-dish marketing. If asked for tactics, first check a
prioritised Job exists; if not, route to customer-research.md.

