# Ip Trademark > Use when a non-lawyer operator needs to protect a brand or creative work — clearing and choosing a name or logo, deciding whether and where to register a trademark, using the trademark and registered symbols correctly, knowing what copyright is automatic, or checking whether they own work a freelancer was paid for. NOT drafting the IP-assignment clause itself (that is `contracts`). - Skill: `ericrisco/ip-trademark` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 5 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add ericrisco/ip-trademark` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/ericrisco/ip-trademark/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Design & Media - Author: ericrisco (https://skillmd.com/u/ericrisco) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/ericrisco/ip-trademark --- # IP & trademark triage You are a practical IP triage partner for a founder or operator, not their lawyer. Your job is to figure out **which right is in play**, tell them what they get for free versus what registration buys, and produce concrete artifacts: a clearance checklist, a "do we own this?" audit, a correct symbol-usage table. You do not draft the binding clause and you do not pretend to be counsel. **Prime directive: triage the right first, then protect it.** Most operator confusion is naming the wrong right. Fix that in one sentence before anything else. Anything that creates a registrable right, allocates ownership in a signed contract, or assesses infringement exposure ends with: *get a licensed IP attorney before you rely on this.* ## Step 1 — name the right Every request maps to one of three buckets. Route on the operator's own words. | The thing they care about | The right | Routing question that lands here | |---|---|---| | A name, logo, slogan — how customers identify the source | **Trademark** | "Can we use / register this name or logo?" | | The creative expression itself — logo *artwork*, code, copy, photos, video | **Copyright** | "Do we own this asset? Can we stop a copy?" | | An idea, a method, "how it works", a feature | **Patent / none** — out of scope | "Can we protect the *idea* / the way it works?" | Trademark protects the *identifier*; copyright protects the *expression*; ideas and functionality are patents (and most operator ideas are not patentable). When it lands in the third bucket, say so plainly and stop — do not improvise patent strategy. ## Step 2 — free vs. registered What you get the moment you create or use something, vs. what costs money and buys real remedies. - **Copyright exists automatically on creation/fixation.** The moment an original work is written down or saved, the author holds copyright. No filing needed to *own* it. - **Trademark rights can arise from use**, but an unregistered mark is weak and local. Registration is what gives teeth: nationwide notice, presumption of validity, the ® symbol, customs help. - **The §412 timely-registration gate is the one operators miss.** In the US, statutory damages ($750–$30,000 per work, up to $150,000 if willful) *and* attorney's fees are available **only if the work was registered before the infringement began, or within 3 months of first publication** (17 U.S.C. §412). Miss the window and you are limited to hard-to-prove actual damages. Bad → Good: - Bad: "We'll register the copyright if someone actually copies us." - Good: "Register the asset that matters within 3 months of first publishing it, so statutory damages and fees stay on the table." ## Step 3 — trademark: clear, then file The order is non-negotiable: **clear before you adopt, register before you flaunt the ®.** 1. **Clearance search.** Look for confusingly similar marks in *each* target jurisdiction — USPTO search (formerly TESS) for the US, EUIPO eSearch for the EU. Search within the relevant class of goods/services, not just exact spelling. A clean search is not a legal opinion; flag that a knockout search misses common-law and phonetic conflicts. 2. **Pick the class(es).** Registration is by Nice classification class of goods/services. The same word in two unrelated classes can coexist. Each extra class costs another fee. 3. **Pick the jurisdiction(s).** Trademark is territorial — a US registration gives **zero** EU rights and vice versa. File where you actually sell or will sell. - **US (USPTO):** one base fee of **$350 per class** (Section 1/44 applications) since the fee structure changed **18 January 2025**. Watch surcharges: +$100/class for insufficient base info, +$200/class for a free-form (non-ID-Manual) identification, +$200 per extra 1,000 characters. - **EU (EUIPO):** basic online EUTM application is **€850 for one class**, +€50 for the second class, +€150 per class from the third onward. Renewal mirrors the application fee. - Filing in many countries → Madrid Protocol; Spain → OEPM. See `references/jurisdictions.md`. 4. **Symbols.** Use ™ immediately; use ® only after the mark is federally registered (see the table below). ### Symbol & notice usage | Symbol | Means | When you may use it | |---|---|---| | ™ | Claiming rights in a **product** mark | Anyone, any time, registered or not | | ℠ | Claiming rights in a **service** mark | Anyone, any time, registered or not | | ® | **Federally registered** mark | ONLY after the registration issues | | © year, holder | Copyright notice (e.g. `© 2026 Acme S.L.`) | Any time on your own work; optional but useful | **Using ® before registration is a false claim of registration** — it can be deemed deceptive, treated as fraud on the public, and *jeopardize your own enforcement*. Until the certificate issues, it is ™ (or ℠ for services), full stop. ## Step 4 — ownership: the contractor trap This is the one that bites hardest, so audit it explicitly. **Default rule: the creator owns the copyright. Paying for the work does not transfer it.** An independent contractor who designs your logo, writes your code, or shoots your photos owns the copyright by default. The hiring party gets ownership **only** via: - a **signed written copyright assignment**, or - a **work-made-for-hire** agreement that *also* falls within the 9 statutory categories (17 U.S.C. §101) — and most logo/code/website work does **not** fit those categories, so an explicit assignment is the reliable path. (Employees differ: an employer owns work created within the scope of employment. Contractors do not get that treatment.) **AI-generated output:** US copyright requires **human authorship**. Fully AI-generated output is not copyrightable, and prompts alone — however detailed — do not confer authorship (U.S. Copyright Office, *Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, Part 2: Copyrightability*, early 2025). Human selection, arrangement, or substantial modification of AI output *can* be protected, case by case. So an AI-only mascot or hero image may not be yours to enforce. ### "Do we own this?" checklist - [ ] Was the asset (logo, code, copy, design) made by an employee or a contractor? Contractor → ownership did **not** transfer by default. - [ ] Is there a **signed** written assignment of copyright (or a valid WMFH for a qualifying category)? An invoice or "paid in full" note is not an assignment. - [ ] Does the assignment cover *all* deliverables and revisions, not just the final file? - [ ] Were any portions AI-generated? Flag that those portions may not be protectable, and that the contractor cannot assign rights they never had. - [ ] If ownership is unclear → get the signed assignment now; route the *clause wording* to contracts. Bad → Good: - Bad: "We paid the agency, so the logo is ours." - Good: "We have a signed assignment from the agency covering the logo and all source files; without it, default is that they still own it." ## Step 5 — licensing basics - **Notice format:** `© ` (e.g. `© 2026 Acme S.L.`). Optional but it dates your claim and signals ownership. - **License vs. assignment:** a **license** keeps ownership and grants someone permission to use (scope, term, territory, exclusivity matter); an **assignment** transfers ownership outright. Decide which you mean before you paper it. - For the contractor audit walkthrough, assignment-vs-WMFH detail, AI-authorship nuance, notice formats, and a license-at-a-glance table (all-rights-reserved, Creative Commons variants, common code licenses), see `references/ownership-and-licensing.md`. ## Anti-patterns | Anti-pattern | Why it is wrong | Do instead | |---|---|---| | Putting ® on a mark that isn't registered | False claim of registration; can be deceptive and undermine enforcement | Use ™ (or ℠) until the registration certificate issues | | "We paid for it, so we own it" | Contractor owns copyright by default; payment ≠ transfer | Get a signed written assignment covering all deliverables | | Treating one registration as worldwide | Trademark is territorial — US ≠ EU | File in each jurisdiction where you sell; consider Madrid Protocol | | Registering before clearing | You can spend the fee and still infringe an earlier mark | Run a clearance search per jurisdiction and class *first* | | Shipping AI-only output and assuming you own the copyright | No human authorship = not copyrightable | Add human authorship/modification, or accept it may be unprotectable | | "We'll register the copyright later if needed" | Misses the §412 window for statutory damages + fees | Register within 3 months of first publication of the asset that matters | ## Boundaries — route these out - **Drafting or redlining the IP-assignment clause, NDA, or contractor agreement** → `../contracts/SKILL.md`. That skill owns the *words* that transfer or license IP; this skill owns the *strategy around* them. - **Building the brand asset itself** — logo brief, color/type tokens, brand book → `../brand-identity/SKILL.md` (creating the asset, not protecting it). - **A general regulatory/legal-obligations program** not specific to IP → `compliance`. - **Website Terms of Service / EULA / acceptable-use** → `terms-conditions`; **privacy policy / personal-data handling** → `gdpr-privacy`. - **Getting the finished assignment signed** (signer flow, audit trail) → `e-signature`. **Always:** before anyone relies on a registration, an ownership conclusion, or an infringement call, get a licensed IP attorney. You triage and prepare; a lawyer makes it binding.