# Linkedin Strategy > Use when a LinkedIn presence — personal brand or company page — needs an account-level decision spanning months: positioning and point of view, three to five content pillars, posting cadence, whether content lives on the founder's profile or the company page, and the social-selling rhythm, read from and written back to the presence's own learning wiki. NOT writing the post copy or hook (that is `linkedin-content`), NOT building a carousel deck (that is `linkedin-carousels`), NOT sending DMs (that is `linkedin-outreach`), NOT pulling raw analytics (that is `linkedin-api`). - Skill: `ericrisco/linkedin-strategy` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 6 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add ericrisco/linkedin-strategy` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/ericrisco/linkedin-strategy/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Marketing & Growth - Author: ericrisco (https://skillmd.com/u/ericrisco) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/ericrisco/linkedin-strategy --- # LinkedIn Strategy — The Presence as a System, Not the Next Post *You operate at account/presence altitude.* You decide the **territory** (what this presence is known for, who it is for) and the **system** (pillars, cadence, where content lives, the social-selling rhythm) over months. You never write the post, build the carousel, run the DMs, or hit the API — those are single-asset jobs you route out. Mixing altitudes is the #1 reason LinkedIn advice goes generic: an account-level question answered with a tactic about one post produces noise and regresses to blog-post defaults. Your spine is a read/write loop with the presence's own history. You **read** the accumulated learnings before deciding and **write** the decision back, so the next session compounds instead of restarting from a generic "post 3 times a week" template. ## Altitude boundary — route single-asset work out | The ask | Skill | Why it is not you | |---|---|---| | Post copy, hook, body for one update | `../linkedin-content/SKILL.md` | You set the pillar and POV; content writes inside it. | | A carousel / document-post deck | `../linkedin-carousels/SKILL.md` | A single asset's format craft, not the system. | | Connection requests, DMs, sequences | `../linkedin-outreach/SKILL.md` | You set the social-selling *rhythm*; outreach runs the individual threads. | | Raw analytics, OAuth, rate limits | `../linkedin-api/SKILL.md` | You *consume* the numbers; the API *fetches* them. | | Cross-platform calendar / scheduling | `../content-engine/SKILL.md`, `../social-publisher/SKILL.md` | Multi-platform planning/posting, not LinkedIn presence architecture. | | Abstract tone/voice rules | `../brand-voice/SKILL.md` | Voice in the abstract; you decide positioning and pillars. | You are the only LinkedIn skill that operates at account altitude and persists its decisions to the wiki. Every sibling works on a single asset or a single thread. ## 1. Read the wiki FIRST — before any decision Read `02-DOCS/wiki/linkedin/` before you decide anything. Why: a positioning or cadence call made without the account's own dwell-time and SSI history is just generic advice with a name on it. The whole value of this skill is that decisions compound. Extract, in this order: 1. **Prior positioning / POV** — what was the presence supposed to be known for, and did it hold? 2. **Current pillars** — the 3-5 topics in play; which carry engagement. 3. **Stated cadence + whether it held at quality** — "3/week" that slipped to ~1 is the real signal, not the stated number. 4. **Top dwell-time / engagement performers** — which specific posts and formats earned the most read time. 5. **SSI trend** — the 0-100 score's direction over the trailing window. 6. **Killed pillars / dead experiments** — so you do not re-propose what already failed. If the directory is empty or absent, **bootstrap it** — create `02-DOCS/wiki/linkedin/` with `positioning.md`, `decisions/`, and `what-worked.md`. Do not skip the read because the dir is missing; an empty wiki is a starting state, not a license to free-associate. When you decide, **cite what you grounded in** ("based on the two carousels that earned top dwell time…"). Full file layout and templates: `references/wiki-records.md`. ## 2. Positioning & POV + where content lives **Niche of authority.** Be known for a clear point of view in one domain. The 2026 algorithm cross-references each post's topic against your title, skills, and background — posting purposefully inside a demonstrated domain builds topical authority; posting about whatever trends suppresses it. Thought leaders post inside a POV; creators just post often. 95% of decision-makers say thought leadership influences purchasing — so the POV is the asset, not the post count. **Where the content lives — the distribution decision.** Personal profiles out-distribute company pages by a wide margin. Decide with this table, not by habit: | Goal / stage | Lean | Why | |---|---|---| | Build reach, inbound, trust | Founder / exec personal profile | Personal content engages ~8x more than the page; profiles get ~65% of feed allocation. | | Recruiting, official announcements, ad retargeting base | Company page (secondary) | Pages lost ~60-66% organic reach 2024-2026, now ~5% of feed; useful as a base, not a megaphone. | | Scale reach without paying | Employee advocacy | Advocacy yields ~561% greater reach and ~7x more lead conversion than the page alone; CEO/founder posts get ~4x the page's engagement. | **Rule: humans are the main event.** The page amplifies; it never carries. ```text Bad: All content posted on the company page; the founder reshares occasionally. Good: The founder posts the POV from their profile; the page reshares as amplification; 5 employees advocate the same week. Reach compounds across human graphs. ``` ## 3. Content pillars — the territory, not the posts Define **3-5 pillars**. Fewer than 3 is a single-note feed; more than 5 dilutes topical authority and confuses the cross-reference. Each pillar must align to the professional graph — the title, skills, and background LinkedIn already knows — so the 2026 topic match rewards you instead of flagging you off-domain. Pillars are the **territory**. `../linkedin-content/SKILL.md` writes the individual posts inside them; you do not. ```text Bad: "I post about whatever's trending that week." Good: A B2B data-platform founder runs 4 pillars: 1. Pipeline reliability war stories (graph-aligned: their actual job) 2. Hiring/scaling a data team 3. Build-vs-buy decision frameworks 4. Behind-the-scenes founder lessons ``` Worked pillar sets for a solo consultant and a company page: `references/ssi-and-pillars.md`. ## 4. Cadence — the rate you can hold, not the rate a blog quotes Pick the **highest rate you can sustain for 8 weeks at quality**. The sweet spot is **2-5 posts/week**, with **3-4/week the highest-ROI band**; consistency beats volume — 8 posts/month for 24 months beats 20/month for 6 months then quitting, because the algorithm rewards a sustained schedule, not a burst. Aim ~20-28h between posts; Tue-Thu is strongest for B2B. Gate every cadence number through this checklist — answer all YES before you commit: - [ ] Is the idea backlog deep enough to feed this rate for 8 weeks? - [ ] Is there bandwidth to *engage* daily (see §5), not just publish? - [ ] Is there format bandwidth for carousels/documents, not only text? If any answer is NO, lower the cadence. A held 3/week beats an aspirational 5/week that collapses to 1. **Format weight.** Carousels and document posts earn 2-3x more dwell time than text or image — and dwell time is the primary 2026 quality signal, not likes. Weight the calendar toward them. **Tie the number to the wiki, not the blog.** If the account's own data shows carousels on one topic earning the best dwell time, the cadence recommendation weights toward that — a number justified by §1's read, never a default. ## 5. The social-selling rhythm — engage-vs-create and SSI **Engagement outweighs raw posting frequency for inbound.** Accounts posting 3x/week *with* active inbound engagement beat daily-posting-no-engagement accounts by ~4.2x in lead gen. The split that works: roughly **~80% of LinkedIn time engaging** (commenting on others' posts, replying in your own threads), **~20% creating**. "20 min creating + 40 min engaging" beats "60 min creating + 0 engaging." Set this as the rhythm; the individual threads belong to `../linkedin-outreach/SKILL.md`. **SSI as a habit system, not a vanity number.** The Social Selling Index is a 0-100 score over four 25-point dimensions, refreshed daily on a trailing 90-day window, free at `linkedin.com/sales/ssi`: | Dimension (25 pts each) | Weekly habit | |---|---| | Establish a professional brand | Publish inside your pillars; complete profile. | | Find the right people | Targeted search + connect within your niche. | | Engage with insights | The ~80% engage block — comment with substance. | | Build relationships | Convert engagement into 1:1 conversations. | Targets: **65+** for active B2B sellers, **75+** is thought-leader territory, all-user average ~40-50. SSI is benchmarked relative to your industry (not absolute) and responds within ~90 days to habit changes — which makes it a usable steering metric, not a scoreboard. Deep per-dimension habit breakdown: `references/ssi-and-pillars.md`. ## 6. The review & double-down loop On a quarterly or monthly review, read §1's what-worked + dwell/SSI trend, then branch: ```text Engagement rising while cadence held? RISING -> a pillar/format is working. Double down: more slots to that pillar, more of that format. Log which one and why. PLATEAUED -> diagnose, do not just post more. Weak pillar topical fit (off-graph topic suppressed) OR weak format/dwell (text where a carousel would earn read time)? DECLINING -> sunset the dead pillar. Reallocate its calendar slot to a rising one. Log it KILLED so no future session re-proposes it. ``` "Post more" never fixes falling engagement — diagnose pillar fit vs format/dwell first. ## 7. Write the decision back — on exit, always Append a dated decision record under `02-DOCS/wiki/linkedin/decisions/`. Every record names the **single metric it bets on** and a **review date** — a decision without a metric is an opinion, not a checkable bet. ```markdown --- type: linkedin-decision title: Move distribution to founder profile description: Founder profile carries the POV; the company page amplifies; refine to 4 pillars and hold 3/week. tags: [linkedin, distribution, positioning, cadence] timestamp: 2026-06-02T00:00:00Z topic: linkedin status: stable --- # 2026-06-02 — Move distribution to founder profile Context read: SSI 48 (flat 90d); top-2 dwell-time posts both carousels on "pipeline reliability"; stated cadence 3/week slipped to ~1; company page reach near zero. Decision: Founder profile carries the POV; company page amplifies; refine to 4 pillars weighted toward the reliability carousel topic; hold 3/week with carousels Tue/Thu. Social-selling rhythm: 80/20 engage/create. Bets on metric: SSI 48 -> 65 within 90 days (proxy for inbound). Review date: 2026-09-02. ``` The `type:` field is required (OKF v0.1); `timestamp` is ISO 8601. The dated heading and the `Decision:` / `Bets on metric:` / `Review date:` lines are domain signals `verify.sh` greps for — keep them. After writing, run `scripts/verify.sh 02-DOCS/wiki/linkedin/` to confirm the record is structurally complete. Full templates and the what-worked format: `references/wiki-records.md`. ## Anti-patterns | Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Do instead | |---|---|---| | Dumping content on the company page | ~5% feed allocation; reach is near dead | Founder/employee profiles carry it; the page amplifies | | Chasing daily posting | Hits a quality cliff, no bandwidth to engage | 3-4/week held + the engage split | | Posting outside your pillars / domain | 2026 topic cross-reference suppresses authority | Stay inside graph-aligned 3-5 pillars | | Optimizing for likes | Misses dwell time, the real 2026 signal | Weight carousels/docs; measure dwell time | | Treating SSI as a vanity score | Ignores it as a steerable habit system | Run the four dimensions as weekly habits | | Create-only, no engaging | ~4.2x worse inbound | ~80/20 engage-to-create split | | Deciding without reading the wiki | Regresses to generic blog advice | READ `02-DOCS/wiki/linkedin/` first | | Never writing the decision back | No compounding; every session restarts | Append a dated record + metric + review date | ## References & routing - `references/wiki-records.md` — file layout under `02-DOCS/wiki/linkedin/`, decision-record and what-worked templates, and exactly what `verify.sh` checks. - `references/ssi-and-pillars.md` — the four SSI dimensions as concrete weekly habits with targets, pillar-design worked examples, and the personal-vs-page + employee-advocacy reach mechanics. Route single-asset work out: post copy → `../linkedin-content/SKILL.md`; carousels → `../linkedin-carousels/SKILL.md`; DMs/sequences → `../linkedin-outreach/SKILL.md`; raw metrics → `../linkedin-api/SKILL.md`; decision discipline → `../decision-records/SKILL.md`.