# Technical Writing > Use when writing or fixing user-facing technical docs — a README, a getting-started tutorial, a how-to guide, or API/CLI/config reference — especially when a page tries to teach, explain and enumerate at once, a tutorial branches, a reference is padded with opinions, a README reads like a sales pitch, samples are stale, or weasel words have crept in. NOT an SEO blog article (that is `article-writing`), NOT the content calendar or pipeline (that is `content-engine`). - Skill: `ericrisco/technical-writing` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 6 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add ericrisco/technical-writing` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/ericrisco/technical-writing/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Marketing & Growth - Author: ericrisco (https://skillmd.com/u/ericrisco) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/ericrisco/technical-writing --- # Technical writing You write the document a person reads to *use* a product or codebase: a README, a tutorial, a how-to, API/CLI/config reference. Not marketing prose, not an SEO article, not a course. The craft is mostly one decision made early and held: **what kind of doc does this reader actually need**, then writing that one kind in its correct shape. The backbone is Diátaxis — four documentation modes, each serving a distinct need (diataxis.fr). The sentence-level rules come from the Google developer documentation style guide (developers.google.com/style). The shipping discipline is docs-as-code: docs live with the code and lint in CI. ## First move: classify the doc Before you write a line, name the reader's need and pick exactly one mode. Mixing modes in one page is the single biggest reason docs fail readers — the learner gets buried in parameters, the expert wades through a beginner tutorial to find one flag. | Reader is… | They want… | Mode | Shape | |---|---|---|---| | Learning, new, hands need holding | To *acquire skill* by doing | **Tutorial** | Linear, runnable, guaranteed to work | | Competent, has a specific goal | To *get a task done* now | **How-to** | Goal-titled, ordered steps, no teaching | | Working, needs a fact | To *look something up* | **Reference** | Dry, complete, mirrors the product | | Curious, wants the "why" | To *understand* | **Explanation** | Discursive, trade-offs, no steps | **Rule: one page, one mode.** Why: a tutorial answers "how do I start?", reference answers "what are the flags?" — a reader arrives with one question, and a page serving two answers neither well. If a page already mixes modes, do not patch it — split it. See `references/diataxis-modes.md` for a worked split of one bad page into four. ## Tutorial A lesson a beginner runs end to end and succeeds. You are the instructor; their success is *your* responsibility, not theirs. - Title it for the learner's gain: "Build your first X", not "X configuration". - State prerequisites and exact versions up top before step 1. - Number every step. Each step produces a visible result the reader can check against. - It must run start-to-finish on a clean machine. Test it on one. - **No branching.** No "if you prefer Y…", no "depending on your setup". One path. - **No explanation of why.** A learner doing 12 new things cannot also absorb design rationale. Link the "why" to an explanation page. Bad → Good opening: ```md Depending on your package manager, install the SDK (we use a monorepo because it scales better). Configure your environment as needed. ## Build your first report You need Python 3.12+ and a free API key from example.com/keys. 1. Install the SDK: ```bash pip install acme-sdk==4.2.0 ``` 2. Save your key: ```bash export ACME_KEY="your-key-here" ``` Run `echo $ACME_KEY` — you should see your key printed back. ``` ## How-to A recipe for someone who already knows the product and has a real goal right now. - Title it as the goal: **"How to rotate an API key"**, not "API keys". - Assume competence. Do not re-teach concepts; link to reference/explanation instead. - Ordered steps, but the reader may adapt — state the goal so they can. - Address one real-world task. "How to configure logging" is reference; "How to ship logs to Datadog" is a how-to. - No tutorial hand-holding, no narrative. Bad → Good: ```md ## Logging Logging is important. A logger has levels: DEBUG, INFO… Here is how levels work, and then some setup. ## How to send logs to Datadog 1. Set `LOG_SINK=datadog` and `DD_API_KEY` in the environment. 2. Restart the worker: `acme worker restart`. 3. Confirm delivery in Datadog → Logs within ~1 min. ``` ## Reference The technical facts, structured to mirror the product. The reader is not reading top to bottom — they are scanning for one entry. - Dry, complete, consistent. Same structure for every entry. - Structure follows the code: one section per command, endpoint, or config key. - Use tables for parameters, flags, return values, and errors. - **No opinions, no recommendations, no "you should".** Reference states what *is*. Move "which one to pick" to a how-to or explanation. - Document every parameter, including defaults and required/optional. ```md ### `GET /reports/{id}` | Param | In | Type | Required | Description | |---|---|---|---|---| | `id` | path | string (uuid) | yes | Report identifier. | | `fields` | query | string | no | Comma-separated fields to return. Default: all. | **Responses** | Status | Meaning | |---|---| | `200` | Report returned. | | `404` | No report with that `id`. | | `429` | Rate limit exceeded; retry after `Retry-After` seconds. | ``` ## Explanation Background and the "why" — context, design decisions, trade-offs, alternatives considered. - Discursive prose, free to make connections and admit nuance. - **Never numbered steps.** If you are writing "1. … 2. …", it is a tutorial or how-to, not an explanation. - Free to hold an opinion and explain the reasoning — this is the *only* mode where opinion belongs. - Title with "About…", "Why…", or a concept name. Read at leisure, not while doing. ## README recipe The one doc everyone gets wrong by turning it into a pitch. A README lives in the top-level directory, orients a *new* reader, and at minimum says what the thing is, what it is for, and links to fuller docs (Google docguide). Skeleton, in order: **what + why (two lines) → install → one minimal runnable example → link to deeper docs → status/license.** Bad → Good opening lines: ```md # Acme SDK 🚀 The most powerful, blazing-fast, developer-friendly toolkit to effortlessly supercharge your data workflows! # Acme SDK A Python client for the Acme reporting API. Fetch, filter, and export reports without writing HTTP by hand. ## Install ```bash pip install acme-sdk==4.2.0 ``` ``` ## Sentence-level rules Apply these to every mode. Each ships clearer prose at no cost. | Rule | Why | Bad → Good | |---|---|---| | Second person, imperative steps | The reader is *doing* this | "The user should run…" → "Run…" | | Active voice | Names who acts | "The file is created by the script" → "The script creates the file" | | Present tense | Docs describe how it works now | "This will return a list" → "This returns a list" | | Define before use | No forward references | Spell out a term the first time, then use it | | One idea per sentence | Scannable, translatable | Split the 40-word sentence into two | | Cut "in order to" | It is always just "to" | "in order to deploy" → "to deploy" | | Ban weasel/AI-tell words | They lie about difficulty and add nothing | "simply run X" → "run X" | Banned words: **simply, just, easy, effortless, seamless, robust, powerful, leverage, utilize, in order to, blazing-fast, supercharge**. If a step is "simple", the reader either already knows it (delete the word) or does not (the word mocks them). Full banlist with replacements is in `references/diataxis-modes.md`. ## Code examples - Minimal: the fewest lines that work. Cut every line not required to run. - Runnable and **tested** — copy-paste it onto a clean machine and confirm. Untested samples rot and misinform. - Language-tag every fence (`bash`, `python`, `json`, `yaml`, `ini`). - Show expected output so the reader knows they succeeded. - No `...` standing in for required lines. Elide only genuinely irrelevant detail, and say so. ```python # Good: minimal, runnable, shows what comes back from acme import Client client = Client(api_key="your-key") report = client.reports.get("3f9a-...") print(report.title) # -> "Q2 revenue" ``` ## Docs-as-code Treat docs like code, or they go stale and mislead. - **Change docs in the same PR as the code they describe.** Dead docs are worse than no docs — they actively misinform and slow developers (Google docguide best practices). - Lint prose in CI. **Vale** is the de-facto open-source prose linter: config in `.vale.ini` at the repo root, custom rules in a styles dir, run as a **blocking check** on every PR touching Markdown. Common rules ban "simply/just/easy" and enforce "sign in" over "log in". Used in production by GitLab, Datadog, and ING. - Test samples and check links in CI (writethedocs.org). A broken `pip install` line in a tutorial breaks every reader. A starter `.vale.ini`, a custom banned-terms style, and a GitHub Actions blocking job are in `references/vale-starter.md`. ## Anti-patterns | Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Do instead | |---|---|---| | One page teaches + explains + lists params | Serves no reader well; all three are diluted | Split by mode (classify table above) | | Tutorial that branches ("if you prefer…") | Beginner cannot judge the choice; loses the path | One guaranteed path; defer choices to a how-to | | How-to that teaches concepts | Wastes the competent reader's time | Link to reference/explanation; just give steps | | Reference with opinions ("we recommend…") | Pollutes a lookup with judgement | Move recommendations to how-to/explanation | | README as a sales page | New reader still does not know what it *is* | What/why in two lines, then install + example | | Untested or `...`-gapped code samples | They rot; reader copies a broken command | Test on a clean machine; show expected output | | Weasel words (simply, just, seamless) | Lie about difficulty, add zero information | Delete the word; the imperative stands alone | | Wall of text, no headings or steps | Unscannable; reader cannot find their answer | Short sentences, one idea each, real headings | ## Before you ship - [ ] Page is exactly **one** Diátaxis mode (tutorial / how-to / reference / explanation). - [ ] Prerequisites and versions are stated before step 1 (tutorial/how-to). - [ ] Every code sample runs on a clean machine and shows expected output. - [ ] No `...` hides a line the reader needs. - [ ] Banlist is clean (`scripts/verify.sh path/to/doc.md`). - [ ] All links resolve. - [ ] README says what it is + what it's for + links to deeper docs. - [ ] Doc changed in the same PR as the code it documents. ## References - `references/diataxis-modes.md` — per-mode templates, a worked split of one mixed page into four, and the full weasel-word/AI-tell banlist with replacements. - `references/vale-starter.md` — starter `.vale.ini`, a custom banned-terms Vale style, and a GitHub Actions job running Vale as a blocking check. ## Siblings - SEO blog post / long-form article with schema and FAQ → `../article-writing/SKILL.md`. - Editorial calendar, pillars, content pipeline → `../content-engine/SKILL.md`. - Teaching a syllabus over time with narrative → `../course-storytelling/SKILL.md`. - Brand tone and voice rules → `../brand-voice/SKILL.md`. - Making docs and samples accessible → `../accessibility/SKILL.md`. - Localizing finished docs into another language → translation-l10n.