# First Run > Use when the declared identity source is missing, an onboarding or Git-pending marker is present, or a user begins onboarding naturally, including “Start Jarvis” in any language. - Skill: `erionis/first-run` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 4 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add erionis/first-run` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/erionis/first-run/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Coding & Dev Tools - Author: Erionis (https://skillmd.com/u/erionis) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/erionis/first-run --- # First run Complete the smallest useful personal setup, verify it, and leave the consumer ready for ordinary work. The capability map in the local profile is authoritative. Never create a second manifest or substitute starter paths. ## Read-only preflight Before the interview, inspect the consumer without changing it: 1. Read the local profile (`CLAUDE.md` in the default starter) and resolve the Identity, Durable memory, Future work, Inbox, and Soul template paths from the consumer contract. 2. Read every resolved source that exists and inspect the declared Inbox. Count both marker types only in the resolved local profile. A marker mentioned in installed system instructions, skill references, or documentation is not consumer state. 3. Before asking any interview question, run `git --version`. Detect the operating system automatically from runtime platform metadata or a safe read-only system query. Do not ask the user which operating system they use when it can be detected. These preflight checks are read-only and require no consent. They do not authorize installation, Git configuration, staging, or a commit. If the capability map is missing or ambiguous, stop and report the exact problem. Do not fall back to a conventional path. ## Resolve first-run state - If Identity exists and neither marker exists, onboarding is complete. Exit with zero questions, zero writes, zero staged changes, and zero commits. - If Identity exists, onboarding-required is absent, and Git-pending exists, skip the personal interview and resume only Local restore point. - If Identity is absent or onboarding-required exists, complete or reconcile personal onboarding first, even when Git-pending also exists. Treat semantic equivalents of `Start Jarvis` in any language as the same trigger. For the default starter, if `99 - Jarvis/memory/soul.md` already exists, do not replace it. ## Personal interview Read and follow [interview.md](interview.md) for the full visible journey. Use one coherent interaction at a time: one free-form question, one decision, or a small group of related closed questions that can be answered together. Keep dependent questions separate until their context exists. Use only direct answers or explicitly confirmed choices; never infer personal facts from vague signals, free-form memory, or unrelated notes. Make no personalized filesystem write before the user approves the final visible recap. Approval covers only the literal personal paths, content summary, folders, templates, and local restore-point outcome displayed in that recap. For a verified fresh Lite package, that outcome also authorizes the internal local-history mutations defined in the Git reference. It never authorizes software installation, an existing repository mutation, remote access, authentication, or push. A request to change the recap invalidates the previous proposal; revise it and ask again. ## One authoritative home per fact Route name, preferred language, and explicit collaboration preferences only to Identity. Route stable role, use domains, sources, tools, and recurring local context only to `CLAUDE.md`. Route current priorities and next actions only to the declared `Future work` source. Do not populate `Durable memory` merely to make onboarding look complete. It may remain nearly empty. If first run reveals a distinct durable preference, constraint, or long-lived model with no better home, present it separately as a `jarvis-memory` candidate. That optional memory proposal is not part of first-run completion and never receives live state. ## Apply the approved personal setup Apply the recap as one approved unit. Preserve all existing custom text unless the recap explicitly identifies a narrow addition. ### Identity If Identity is absent, render the complete Soul template in the confirmed language: translate every prose heading and sentence while preserving the template's semantic structure, replace `[NAME]` and `[LANGUAGE]`, and apply only explicit collaboration differences approved in the recap. Do not leave template tokens or shorten the template into a profile card. Never replace or patch an existing Soul during first run. Its current bytes are authoritative even when onboarding-required remains. Later Identity evolution belongs to `jarvis-memory`. ### Local context and future work Replace only approved placeholder entries in the stable-context sections of `CLAUDE.md`; preserve the capability map and all non-placeholder text. For a progressive start, use plain final statements such as `To be learned progressively`, `None declared`, or `No active overrides` instead of bracketed placeholders. Write approved current priorities and next actions to the active section of the declared Future work source. Deduplicate an existing matching item. A progressive start must not invent a task merely to fill the file. ### Visible structure Create the single `98 - Archive/README.md` at the approved workspace root. Create at most four approved numbered domain folders. Every created folder receives a short `README.md` that states its purpose without inventing user facts. Create a template only for an explicitly recurring output. A progressive start creates no domain folder and no template. Never create `PROFILE.md`, `JARVIS.md`, a second Soul, or a second capability manifest. ## Reconciliation and resume When onboarding-required remains, reconcile against the filesystem instead of starting over: - If Identity exists, preserve it byte for byte and complete only the missing approved scope. Do not mine it or another file for unconfirmed answers. - If interruption happened before recap approval, no partial answers were persisted; restart the interview from the first unresolved decision. - If interruption happened after approved writes began, re-read the actual files, show a missing-only recap, and require approval for that remaining literal scope. Do not rewrite completed items. The acceptance behavior is a missing-only resume: existing Soul bytes stay unchanged, completed items are not rewritten, and any failed verification keeps onboarding visibly pending. ## Verify personal completion Re-read every approved personal file and every created README or template. Verify that Identity, Durable memory, and Future work resolve and are readable; that the capability map is intact; that the approved visible structure matches the recap; and verify that no onboarding placeholder remains. Remove `` only after every verification passes. Preserve every non-marker line. Re-read `CLAUDE.md` and prove that the onboarding marker count is zero before reporting completion. A failed or incomplete verification retains exactly one onboarding marker. Report the exact missing or mismatched path and make no blind rewrite. Do not claim that the workspace is ready. ## Close personal setup Only after verification, record that personal setup is complete internally. Do not yet offer the First trial or lead with Git. Continue to Local restore point; missing or deferred local protection never invalidates the completed personal setup. ## Local restore point The detailed workflow lives in [git-checkpoint.md](git-checkpoint.md). Read it only after personal setup verification, including a Git-only resume where onboarding is already complete. Pass it the resolved local-profile path, the confirmed Identity name when available, the literal approved personal paths, the Git and operating-system preflight results, and the installed release manifest and seed-state paths. Follow that reference through one completed, deferred, unavailable, or safely failed local restore-point result. ## Safety check Before ending, re-read the resolved personal files and local profile. Confirm that the existing Soul was retained when present, only explicit fields and marker lines changed, onboarding is either safely complete or visibly pending, and no remote, authentication, or push was attempted. After the local restore point is completed, deferred, unavailable, or safely failed, continue with the First trial and Continuity guide from the interview reference.