# Marketing Pod > Marketing Pod - Skill: `everyinc/marketing-pod` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 4 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add everyinc/marketing-pod` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/everyinc/marketing-pod/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Marketing & Growth - Author: everyinc (https://skillmd.com/u/everyinc) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/everyinc/marketing-pod --- # Marketing Pod Run a role-bounded team of marketing agents in parallel while Douglas remains the conductor, strategic decision-maker, and final taste authority. Use Marketing OS as the shared constitution, then give each worker only the sources, skills, authority, and output contract required for its job. This is an optional execution layer for work that genuinely benefits from independent specialists. It coordinates agents without replacing the specialist skills or treating agent count as progress. Douglas retains consequential strategy, approval, and final taste authority. ## When to invoke - When Douglas asks to run a marketing pod or parallelize Marketing OS work - When Douglas says “help me run marketing for this,” “take point on this launch,” “figure out how we should market this,” or otherwise asks for substantial marketing work with several moving parts - When a launch, brand system, campaign, event, or recurring program has three or more separable workstreams - When research, strategy, operations, channel production, and QA need distinct owners - When one long agent thread is producing context loss, duplicated work, weak source authority, or expensive review - When testing whether a Marketing OS workflow can compound across repeated runs Do not invoke for a single copy edit, one channel asset, a narrow research question, or work whose strategic foundation is still too ambiguous to divide responsibly. ## How Douglas invokes this Douglas never has to say “wave,” “project packet,” “work order,” or name the agents he needs. Those are internal operating terms, not a command language. A normal request is enough: - “Help me run the Every Agent launch.” - “Take point on the marketing for this event.” - “Can we figure out how to launch this?” - “There are too many moving pieces here. Organize this for me.” Translate the request into the operating system silently. Respond in plain English: 1. Resolve what the request and supplied sources already establish. 2. Summarize the governing brief and what remains genuinely unclear. 3. Propose the first few agents by the work they will do, not by formal role names. 4. Explain what Douglas will receive, then ask a natural approval question such as: “I think the first move is to have three agents check the product truth, customer evidence, and competitive landscape. Want me to start?” 5. After approval, handle IDs, versions, source maps, assignments, and status tracking without making Douglas operate the machinery. Use these translations in user-facing updates: | Internal term | Say to Douglas | |---|---| | Project packet | Shared brief, or “what everyone is working from” | | Wave | Batch, round, or “the agents working now” | | Work order | Assignment, or “what this agent owns” | | Discovery gate | “Here is what we learned and what you need to decide” | | Strategy gate | “Here is the recommended direction; approve or redirect it” | Use the formal terms only inside logs and reusable contracts where precision matters. ## Opening alignment Do not make Douglas repeat facts or decisions that the request and supplied sources already establish. Search authorized Slack, Notion, Drive, product, and analytics sources before asking for discoverable information. Ask one to three plain-language questions only when a missing human judgment could change the strategy, team, approval chain, external action, or definition of success. Before the governing brief is clear, do not: - Dispatch agents or prepare assignments - Draft strategy, copy, briefs, plans, or deliverables - Modify files, post messages, contact people, or change any system When the request leaves them open, establish the highest-leverage human context: - What outcome would make this feel successful? - What is the idea, tension, or instinct Douglas does not want flattened? - What is already decided, politically sensitive, constrained, or off-limits? Do not turn alignment into intake paperwork. When the opening request and sources settle the brief, summarize it in Douglas's language, propose the first batch, and continue if that batch is already authorized. Otherwise ask for the missing ruling or permission to start. ## Operating contract Keep Douglas in the manager role: - Douglas chooses the problem, rules strategic conflicts, approves the launch constitution, protects the creative premise, and owns final quality. - Worker agents execute bounded jobs. They do not delegate, expand scope, publish, contact people, or alter a canonical source unless explicitly authorized. - One role owns each decision surface. Parallel workers never edit the same canonical artifact. - Every factual claim traces to a current source. Every inference is labeled. - Project state stays in the project packet. Only transferable, sufficiently supported learning enters Marketing OS. Load `references/role-charters.md` before selecting workers. Load `references/handoff-contracts.md` before dispatch. Load `references/run-scorecard.md` before the first wave so the run has a baseline and decision rule. ## Choose the pod Use the smallest pod that covers the work. Prefer three to five concurrent workers. ### Launch pod Use for product, event, editorial-franchise, or major feature launches: 1. Truth and evidence 2. Customer proof 3. Category and competition 4. Launch operations 5. Strategy after the discovery gate 6. Channel production after strategy lock 7. Independent QA and measurement ### Brand pod Use with `strategy/compound-brand`: 1. Customer and category research 2. Competitive verbal audit 3. Competitive visual and semiotic audit 4. Brand-equity evidence 5. Verbal and visual production only after the relevant human gate ### Program pod Use for a recurring campaign, channel, partnership, event, affiliate, PR, or research program: 1. Audience and demand evidence 2. Mechanism and operational feasibility 3. Economics and measurement preflight 4. Creative system and channel expression after the Program Brief locks ## Run the workflow ### 1. Establish authority Identify the sources and people that own product truth, strategic decisions, canonical copy, structure, formatting, evidence, approval, and publication. Search the supplied Slack, Notion, Drive, product, and analytics sources before asking Douglas for anything discoverable. After the initial source review, ask follow-up questions only when an unresolved answer would change the pod structure, strategic direction, approval chain, external action, or definition of success. Ask one to three questions at a time. ### 2. Build the shared brief Build one versioned shared brief using `references/handoff-contracts.md`. Internally this is the project packet. Include the objective, primary audience action, authority map, locked decisions, protected creative premise, open questions, exclusions, required artifacts, approval owners, source links, baseline, and success gate. Do not turn the packet into durable doctrine. It is current project state. ### 3. Choose the next batch Run only independent jobs in the same wave. Work is parallel-safe when workers have: - No dependency on another worker's unfinished decision - Disjoint output artifacts and authority - The same approved source packet - No shared live document or destination to edit - A reconciliation cost smaller than the expected production savings Serialize uncertain or overlapping work. Cap a wave at five workers. Before every dispatch, tell Douglas what the shared brief says, which agents you propose to start, what each will return, and what remains blocked. Dispatch only after he approves that exact batch or explicitly approves a brief version that names and pre-authorizes a later batch and its assignments. Record that authorization in the decision log. A broad request to “run the pod” is not standing approval for later batches. ### 4. Give each agent a clear assignment Give each worker a fresh context containing only: - The project packet - Its role charter - Its assigned Marketing OS skills - Its task and output contract - Its allowed sources and tools - Explicit exclusions and stop conditions - Its verification and handoff recipient Use actual parallel agent tools when the environment permits them. If parallel agents are unavailable, produce complete work orders for separate tasks and state that the pod was prepared but an independent pod run did not occur. Do not simulate independence with multiple personas in one context. ### 5. Review what the first batch learned Reconcile the first wave into one discovery packet. Surface contradictions rather than averaging them. Douglas approves the evidence base, resolves authority conflicts, and rules what the Strategy worker must decide. Do not begin strategy or channel production before this gate passes. ### 6. Choose the strategy Dispatch one Strategy worker from the approved discovery packet. It returns the governing audience, offer, value hierarchy, position, proof system, campaign hierarchy, conversion path, creative premise, primary action, and strategic refusal. Douglas approves or redirects that exact decision brief. Record the ruling and increment the project-packet version. Do not begin channel production before the strategy gate passes. ### 7. Run production in parallel Dispatch channel or craft workers from the same approved decision packet. Give web, email, social, press, video, and art-direction workers separate artifacts. Require them to preserve the same proposition, claims, naming, dates, prices, and primary action. Channel workers adapt the strategy to their medium. They do not reopen it. ### 8. Run independent QA Give the QA worker the approved packet and produced artifacts, not the production workers' reasoning. Require: - Claims clearance and permission checks - Cross-surface fact and offer consistency - Positioning, audience, and voice alignment - Missing-state, dependency, and approval checks - Measurement and instrumentation readiness - A plain block list for anything that cannot ship QA reports findings. It does not silently rewrite the canonical work. ### 9. Review, decide, and compound Present Douglas with the governing decisions, finished artifacts, contradictions, blockers, QA findings, and the scorecard. Record his rulings in the decision log. After the measurement window, use `marketing-science/measurement` and `marketing-science/measurement/references/compound-from-results.md`. Promote a learning only when it passes the Marketing OS knowledge-boundary test. ## Failure rules - Stop a worker that invents facts, changes its role, or writes beyond its authority. - Supersede stale outputs after a source or decision changes; never merge both versions. - Re-run only the affected downstream work after a ruling changes. - Collapse to a serial workflow when parallel outputs repeatedly collide. - Never count agent volume as progress. Count accepted artifacts, lower review burden, reliability, and improved second-run performance. ## Dependencies - `foundation/marketing-os` - `foundation/marketing-os/references/collaboration.md` - `foundation/marketing-os/references/knowledge-boundaries.md` - `strategy/program-brief` for recurring programs - `strategy/compound-brand` for brand systems - `launches/launch-brief` for the L/XL flagship constitution - `marketing/gtm` for all GTM strategy, launch plans, and drumbeats - `marketing-science/research` - `marketing-science/measurement` - `launches/claims-clearance` - The relevant `positioning/`, `brand-voice/`, and `craft/` skills ## Quick checklist - [ ] Douglas was interviewed before research, delegation, drafting, or system action - [ ] Douglas remains the manager and final decision-maker - [ ] The project has three or more genuinely separable workstreams - [ ] Authority and canonical sources are explicit - [ ] The project packet contains the baseline and success gate - [ ] Every worker has one role, one artifact, and explicit exclusions - [ ] Parallel workers do not share a live document or unresolved dependency - [ ] Strategy is approved before channel production - [ ] QA is independent from production - [ ] No external write or contact occurs without authorization - [ ] The scorecard records reliability, review burden, adoption, and second-run change - [ ] Project learning passes the knowledge-boundary test before entering Marketing OS