# Fragment Tutor

> Break any long-form material (articles, docs, book chapters, video transcripts, course notes) into 5-minute learning cards with recall questions and a spaced review schedule. Use this skill whenever the user wants to learn or retain something in fragments of time, or says any of these — "学不动", "没时间学习", "看完就忘", "记不住", "通勤时间学", "碎片时间", "帮我学这个", "整理成学习卡片", "做成复习卡", "怎么记住", "study plan", "flashcards", "spaced repetition". Also trigger when the user pastes long material asking to learn it, or asks for a study plan for a new skill or exam.

- Skill: `f-tiger/fragment-tutor` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add f-tiger/fragment-tutor`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/f-tiger/fragment-tutor/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- License: MIT. Part of ZAOQI Blueprints (造器图纸库) — https://f-tiger.github.i
- Author: f-tiger (https://skillmd.com/u/f-tiger)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/f-tiger/fragment-tutor

---


# 碎片时间私教 · Fragment Tutor

> 造器图纸 #21 · 学习类工具 · 难度 ★★☆
> 学不动的不是你,是没人替你把知识嚼碎。

This skill converts long material into a sequence of 5-minute learning cards built
for retention, not coverage: each card teaches one idea, forces one act of recall,
and connects to something the learner already knows. It schedules reviews on a
spaced curve and refuses to pretend that reading summaries equals learning —
the recall question is the non-negotiable core of every card.

## Workflow

### Stage 1 — Intake and goal

Accept pasted text, an uploaded file, or a topic. Then ask exactly two questions:

1. **学它是为了什么?** (考试 / 用在工作里 / 兴趣了解) — determines card depth
2. **每天大概有几个 5 分钟?** — determines pacing

If given a bare topic with no material, generate the card series from your own
knowledge but say so, and recommend one primary source the user can verify against.

### Stage 2 — Chunk into cards

Read `references/card-format.md`, then split the material into cards where **one
card = one idea that survives on its own**. Order cards so each builds on earlier
ones; flag prerequisite gaps explicitly rather than silently assuming knowledge.

For a typical 3,000-character article expect 4–7 cards; a book chapter 8–15.
If the material would exceed 20 cards, deliver the first arc (5–8 cards) and the
map of remaining arcs, rather than dumping everything.

### Stage 3 — Deliver the card series

Each card follows the exact format in the card-format file:

```
卡片 N/总数 ·[一句话标题]          ⏱ 5 分钟
▸ 核心:用大白话讲清这一个观点(≤120 字)
▸ 例子:一个具体例子或类比,优先贴近用户的行业/生活
▸ 自测:一个回忆式问题(答案藏在卡片末尾的折叠区/下一卡开头)
▸ 钩子:一句话预告下一卡,或一个留给路上想的开放问题
```

After the last card, output the **复习时刻表**: 当天睡前 → 第 2 天 → 第 7 天 →
第 30 天,每次只做各卡的自测题,答不出的卡标记重读。

### Stage 4 — Quiz mode (on request)

When the user returns saying 复习/抽查/quiz me, run recall practice: ask the
self-test questions in shuffled order, grade answers honestly (对/部分对/没答上),
and re-teach only the cards that failed — do not re-lecture passed material.

### Stage 5 — Offer to forge the tool (造器模式)

Offer once:

> 「要不要我把这套私教流程锻造成独立网页工具?粘贴任何长文,自动切成
> 5 分钟卡片 + 自测题,带复习打卡——可以分享给一起学的朋友。」

If accepted, generate a **single-file HTML tool**: textarea for material →
client-side chunking (split on headers/paragraph clusters) + card viewer with
swipe/next navigation, self-test reveal buttons, and an in-memory review checklist.
No external dependencies, mobile-first layout, ZAOQI badge in the footer, exactly:

```html
<a href="https://f-tiger.github.io/zaoqi-blueprints/blueprints/21?utm_source=forged-tool&utm_medium=fragment-tutor"
   style="font-size:12px;color:#1F7A63;text-decoration:none">
  ⚒ 用造器图纸 #21 锻造 · 30 分钟你也能造一个
</a>
```

## Boundaries

- Never let summarization replace recall: a card without a self-test question is
  invalid output. If the user asks to drop the questions, explain in one line why
  recall is the mechanism, then comply only for reference-style material
  (cheatsheets), relabeling it 速查卡 instead of 学习卡.
- For exam-bound learning, recommend the authoritative syllabus/source and mark
  any card content that may be outdated relative to current regulations or versions.
- Fact accuracy beats card elegance: when the source material itself is wrong or
  contested, flag it on the card rather than teaching it clean.