# Draft Due Diligence Summary

> Guides preparation of an investment-committee-ready due diligence summary memo that synthesizes findings by severity tier, translates financial adjustments into enterprise-value impact, identifies insurance coverage gaps for excluded exposures, and provides deal-protection recommendations for significant issues.

- Skill: `finchipaiorg/draft-due-diligence-summary` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add finchipaiorg/draft-due-diligence-summary`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/finchipaiorg/draft-due-diligence-summary/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: FinchipAIOrg (https://skillmd.com/u/finchipaiorg)
- Updated: 2026-09-22
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/finchipaiorg/draft-due-diligence-summary

---


# Skill: Draft Due Diligence Summary Memo

## 1. Subject-matter triage
- Treat this as an investment-committee summary, not a workstream dump.
- Pull the transaction basics to the front: parties, deal form, financing posture if given, valuation framing, and the recommended posture on signing/closing.
- If the source set contains multiple diligence reports, management materials, and draft deal documents, synthesize them into one integrated view and avoid repeating the same issue in multiple places.
- If only one category of issue is present, say so explicitly; otherwise sort issues into all applicable severity tiers before analysis.

## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Presenting findings by diligence workstream instead of by practical importance, which hides what matters most to the investment committee.
- Stopping at issue description instead of tying each issue to scale, document interaction, and transaction consequence.
- Stating a financial adjustment without translating it into pricing or enterprise-value impact.
- Treating insured and uninsured risks alike, or failing to flag exclusions that leave the buyer exposed.
- Describing related-party fees, environmental exposures, or pre-closing liabilities without converting them into deal-protection asks.
- Writing a memo that diagnoses problems but does not end with concrete actions, owners, and timing.

## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- IC-ready due diligence summary memos typically lead with transaction overview and recommendation, then present findings by severity, not by source document.
- For any legal or contractual proposition, anchor the statement in the governing source or recognized authority rather than leaving it implicit.
- In a stock acquisition, pre-closing liabilities generally remain economically important because they transfer with the business; diligence must therefore test indemnity scope, insurance exclusions, and any uncapped or weakly capped exposures.
- EBITDA normalization should distinguish true add-backs from ongoing costs and replacement costs, especially for affiliate services, consulting, management, or similar related-party arrangements.
- If diligence identifies government-sponsored employment incentives, tax credits, or similar claims, assess substantiation quality, audit sensitivity, and whether the relevant insurance program excludes that exposure.
- Environmental risks should be compared against any contractual indemnity cap or comparable protection to test whether the available backstop is commensurate with the exposure.
- Legal conclusions should be tied to the clause, policy, statute, regulation, or other governing source that supports them.

## 4. Analytical scaffolds
- Start with a concise transaction overview: who is buying, what is being bought, how the deal is structured, and the overall recommendation.
- Define a uniform ordinal severity scale once and use it consistently throughout the memo.
- Run the issue analysis once per distinct issue, not once per workstream.
- For each issue, state:
  - severity;
  - scale or quantification from the source materials;
  - the document, clause, policy, or report that interacts with the issue;
  - the downstream consequence for the buyer or transaction.
- For quality-of-earnings or other financial adjustments, present:
  - the adjustment basis;
  - the annualized amount;
  - the implied enterprise-value impact at the deal multiple;
  - the resulting normalized earnings view.
- For insured-exposure topics, identify:
  - what the exposure is;
  - whether it is covered, carved out, or uncertain;
  - what protection is still needed because of the exclusion or limitation.
- For related-party expenses, classify each item as:
  - appropriate add-back;
  - ongoing run-rate expense;
  - replacement cost after closing.
- For environmental or similar contingent liabilities, compare estimated exposure to any contractual protection and state whether a separate escrow, specific indemnity, special escrow, or other remedy is warranted.
- Convert each material issue into a deal-protection recommendation tied to the issue’s severity and practical risk.

## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships
- When a risk appears in multiple sources, reconcile the documents rather than treating them as independent findings.
- When a diligence finding depends on a draft SPA term, compare the finding to the current draft and state whether the draft already addresses it, partially addresses it, or leaves it open.
- When a risk has a timing dimension, distinguish pre-signing, signing-to-closing, and post-closing implications.
- When a liability could survive closing, make that temporal consequence explicit.
- When insurance coverage depends on exclusions, endorsements, or definition changes, analyze the exclusion against the actual exposure class rather than the headline policy label.

## 6. Output structure conventions
- Write an IC-ready due diligence summary memo in plain business-legal prose.
- Open with a transaction overview and bottom-line recommendation.
- Include a severity-tiered findings section using a single ordinal scale and keep the highest-risk items together.
- Include a financial adjustments section that ties each adjustment to enterprise-value impact and normalized earnings.
- Include a separate insurance/excluded-exposure discussion for items that are not clearly covered.
- Include a related-party expenses discussion when affiliate or management-type fees appear in the materials.
- Include an environmental or contingent-liability discussion when relevant protection caps or backstops appear.
- Include a deal-protection section that assigns a specific protection to each critical or material issue.
- End with a Recommended Actions block that uses imperative verbs, identifies the responsible role where available, and includes a timing anchor tied to the signing/closing process or another source-based deadline.
- Keep the memo concise, decision-oriented, and ready for investment committee circulation.