# Draft Tax Court Petition > A Tax Court petition must satisfy the formal requirements of the applicable Tax Court rules and should challenge each adjustment in the notice of deficiency with a separately labeled assignment of error, without omitting any adjustment that needs to be preserved for litigation. - Skill: `finchipaiorg/draft-tax-court-petition` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add finchipaiorg/draft-tax-court-petition` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/finchipaiorg/draft-tax-court-petition/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Coding & Dev Tools - Author: FinchipAIOrg (https://skillmd.com/u/finchipaiorg) - Updated: 2026-09-22 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/finchipaiorg/draft-tax-court-petition --- # Skill: Draft United States Tax Court Petition ## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting - Drafting around the main deficiency while omitting a separate challenge to penalties, additions, or alternative characterizations that must be preserved. - Failing to identify the notice of deficiency with enough specificity to support jurisdiction, including the issuing office and the tax years at issue. - Omitting required petition components: caption, jurisdictional allegation, numbered assignments of error, supporting facts, prayer for relief, signature/counsel block, and verification or declaration under penalties of perjury. - Collapsing multiple IRS adjustments into one broad objection instead of pleading each adjustment separately so the challenged determination is clear on the face of the petition. - Stating conclusions without the legal theory that makes each challenge intelligible under Tax Court pleading practice. - Losing track of multiple tax years and pleading facts or objections for one year that do not apply to the other. ## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply - **Tax Court pleading rules:** Follow Tax Court Rules 32 and 34 for form, content, and verification. Plead a short, plain statement of grounds, clear and concise assignments of error, and supporting facts sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of the dispute. - **Jurisdictional basis:** Allege that the IRS issued a notice of deficiency under the Internal Revenue Code and identify the notice by date, office, and tax years so the petition invokes Tax Court jurisdiction on a proper face. - **One assignment per adjustment:** Treat each disputed adjustment in the notice as a separate pleaded issue, including penalties and any recharacterized or disallowed items. - **Facts matched to each issue:** Pair each assignment of error with the operative facts that support it; do not leave the court to infer the theory from narrative alone. - **Relief sought:** Request that the Court determine no deficiency and no penalty, or otherwise reduce the asserted amounts as warranted by the facts and law. - **Verification:** Include the required verification or declaration under penalties of perjury in the form used for Tax Court petitions. - **Counsel block:** If counsel signs, include the practitioner identification required for filing and ensure the signatory information is complete. - **Authority-aware pleading:** When invoking a pleading requirement, penalty challenge, or jurisdictional proposition, name the governing rule, statute, or other controlling authority rather than relying on a bare assertion. - **Multi-year pleading discipline:** Organize the petition so the reader can see which facts and objections apply to each year and which issues are common across years. ## 4. Analytical scaffolds - Start by extracting from the notice of deficiency every disputed item for each tax year, including penalties, and map each item to a separate assignment of error. - If the source materials cover more than one year, enumerate the years and then draft the pleading year by year so no adjustment is inadvertently carried over or omitted. - Use a standard Tax Court petition sequence: caption; jurisdictional allegations; assignments of error; statement of facts; prayer for relief; signature/counsel block; verification. - For each assignment of error, identify the adjustment, state that the Commissioner erred, and anchor the challenge to the relevant legal theory at a category level. - Where a factual defense depends on documentary support, plead the operative facts needed to tee up that defense without over-arguing the evidence. - If compensation, deductions, capitalization, valuation, worker classification, or penalty-related adjustments appear, tailor the factual allegations to the specific type of adjustment rather than using generic denials. - Ensure the petition references the notice of deficiency as an exhibit and that the caption and jurisdictional paragraph align with the same notice. - Before finalizing, verify that each disputed item in the notice is addressed somewhere in the petition and that the prayer for relief tracks the pleaded challenges. ## 6. Output structure conventions - Draft the artifact as a formal United States Tax Court petition in conventional pleading style. - Use a proper caption naming the petitioner and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, with a docket number placeholder if none is assigned. - Include a jurisdictional paragraph that identifies the notice of deficiency and the taxable periods covered. - Present numbered assignments of error, one per disputed adjustment, followed by concise supporting facts tied to those issues. - Include a prayer for relief that asks the Court to redetermine the asserted deficiency and penalties. - Include counsel/signature information and the required verification or declaration under penalties of perjury. - Attach or reference the notice of deficiency as an exhibit when the source documents provide it. - Keep the pleading internally consistent across tax years, amounts, labels, and party names.