# Flow > Harmonia flow - run a pinned task through plan, implement, and review in one unattended pass, stopping at human acceptance. Use ONLY when explicitly invoked as /harmonia:flow. - Skill: `foliveira/flow` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add foliveira/flow` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/foliveira/flow/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Productivity - Author: foliveira (https://skillmd.com/u/foliveira) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/foliveira/flow --- Your working contract is the 4 rules; their digest is injected at session start - read `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/RULES.md` in full only if that digest is not in your context. Read the plan, implement, and review stages from `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/lifecycle.yaml` - their artifacts and gates are authoritative and define the transitions below; do not hardcode them. This runner is a meta-command, not a lifecycle stage: it holds no stage logic of its own and hardcodes no agent list. Each stage's own SKILL.md owns its orchestration - agents, the red-green loop, the panel, the gates - so execute those procedures and never restate them (R9). Span: plan, then implement, then review, in one unattended session. Discuss stays manual because it is dialogic - the scoper and rubber-duck question the developer, so it cannot run unattended - and acceptance stays manual under the human-only gate. The runner chains neither. 1. Entry gate - require a pinned scope that carries criteria: `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh resolve --repo .` to locate the active workspace (never mint; on ambiguity or no-active-task, surface the script's message and stop). If the resolved workspace has no `scope.md`, refuse and point the developer to `/harmonia:discuss` - the runner starts from an already-pinned scope and never mints or auto-scopes. With `scope.md` present, gate its criteria before any work: run `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/check-criteria.sh --workspace --repo .` and halt on a non-zero exit - a criteria-less or non-machine-checkable scope is refused up front and pointed to `/harmonia:discuss`, the same refusal as the no-scope path (the check writes a status-validated `receipts/check-criteria.json`; the implement gate re-runs it, redundant but harmless). With scope and criteria confirmed, clear this run's stale prior-run output before any transition runs by calling `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh clear-span --repo .`; the subcommand names the span out-artifacts and confines the removal to the resolved workspace, so this runner no longer restates that file list (it lives in `bin/workspace.sh`, exercised by `tests/workspace.bats`). `scope.md` is the pinned input and is never removed. 2. Plan: execute the plan stage per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/plan/SKILL.md`. Scope is present, so the scoper consumes and refines it and never re-mints (R31). Before advancing, confirm the plan stage wrote its `design.md` out-artifact to the workspace; if it did not, halt and hand back. 3. Implement: execute the implement stage per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/implement/SKILL.md`. Its pre-implement gate runs `check-criteria`. Inspect that gate's signal directly: halt when `receipts/check-criteria.json` records a `status` other than `pass`, or when `check-criteria` exits non-zero. On that signal the criteria are not machine-checkable, so implement writes no code - a stop before any work begins, unlike the review halt in step 5 which stops after the work with `verdict.md` and `gate-report.md` already on disk. Halt and hand back with the failing-criteria report and its receipt (`receipts/check-criteria.json`); do not advance. 4. Advance to review - unconditional: once the implement stage has written its `boundary.md` and `diff-summary.md` out-artifacts, advance to review whether the red-green loop completed or exited incomplete at its `max_rounds` cap. The cap is not a gate failure; the loop records the disagreement in the workspace for the review lead to arbitrate. Do not inspect the coverage result to decide advancing. 5. Review: execute the review stage per `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/review/SKILL.md`. Take its `verdict.md` as authoritative. Halt on a failing review gate: if the verdict is not a pass because a coverage, criteria-run, or receipts gate failed, or because a test-immutability violation was recorded, stop and hand back with `verdict.md` and `gate-report.md` on disk. Never record a coverage override to keep going, and never override the lead's verdict. 6. Stop before capture - hand back: the runner ends after review. It never writes the `accepted` marker and never runs `bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/workspace.sh accept` - acceptance is a human act. Never run accept on the developer's behalf. Hand back a summary telling the developer to exercise the built behavior, record acceptance via `/harmonia:accept`, then invoke `/harmonia:capture` as a separate manual act. The runner never enters capture. Pass workspace paths, not prose recaps (R8). Orchestrate only (R9).