# Idea Validator

> A structured idea testing framework that runs every concept through a reality checklist before you invest time, money, or energy. Combines lean validation, customer discovery, and risk analysis into a single process for solopreneurs, creators, and innovators.

- Skill: `gabrielmoreira/idea-validator` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add gabrielmoreira/idea-validator`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/gabrielmoreira/idea-validator/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Product & Planning
- Author: gabrielmoreira (https://skillmd.com/u/gabrielmoreira)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/gabrielmoreira/idea-validator

---


# Idea Validator

## What It Does

Turns raw ideas into testable hypotheses. Instead of falling in love with an idea and building it in a vacuum, this skill runs it through a validation gauntlet — surfacing assumptions, identifying risks, and designing the smallest possible test to learn whether the idea has legs before you commit significant resources.

---

## The Validation Funnel

```
                 ┌─────────────┐
                 │  RAW IDEA   │
                 └──────┬──────┘
                        │
                 ┌──────▼──────┐
                 │  CANVAS IT  │  ← Problem, Solution, Audience, Channel
                 └──────┬──────┘
                        │
                 ┌──────▼──────┐
                 │ CHECKLIST   │  ← 20-point viability screen
                 └──────┬──────┘
                        │
                 ┌──────▼──────┐
                 │ RISK MAP    │  ← What could kill this?
                 └──────┬──────┘
                        │
                 ┌──────▼──────┐
                 │ TEST DESIGN │  ← Smallest experiment that teaches most
                 └──────┬──────┘
                        │
                 ┌──────▼──────┐
                 │ GO / PIVOT  │
                 │   / KILL    │
                 └─────────────┘
```

---

## The 20-Point Validation Checklist

Rate each factor as ✅ Strong / ⚠️ Moderate / ❌ Weak

### Problem & Need

- [ ] **1. Is this a real problem?** Not a "nice to have" — would people pay to solve it?
- [ ] **2. Is the problem widespread?** Does enough of your target audience have it?
- [ ] **3. Is the problem urgent?** Are people actively searching for solutions right now?
- [ ] **4. Are people already trying to solve it?** What workarounds exist?
- [ ] **5. Is the problem getting worse?** Trend tailwinds?

### Solution & Product

- [ ] **6. Can you solve this better than existing alternatives?** 2-10× better?
- [ ] **7. Is there a clear "must-have" feature set?** Or is the scope fuzzy?
- [ ] **8. Can you build a minimum version in < 4 weeks?** Speed to test matters
- [ ] **9. Does the solution have a clear "why now?"** Timing advantage?
- [ ] **10. Is it legally/ethically clear?** Any regulatory risks?

### Market & Audience

- [ ] **11. Can you name 20 real people who would buy this?** Not "people like that"
- [ ] **12. Is there a clear, reachable channel to find them?** SEO, ads, communities?
- [ ] **13. Is the market growing?** Expanding, flat, or shrinking?
- [ ] **14. Is the market big enough?** Can it support a sustainable business?
- [ ] **15. Is the competition healthy (not too crowded, not nonexistent)?** No competition usually means no market

### Business & You

- [ ] **16. Can this be profitable?** Rough unit economics work?
- [ ] **17. Do you have unfair advantage?** Why can't 10 others copy this tomorrow?
- [ ] **18. Will this be personally sustainable?** Do you actually want to work on this for years?
- [ ] **19. Can you test this without quitting your day job?** Low-risk validation path?
- [ ] **20. If this fails, what's the downside?** Acceptable loss?

**Score interpretation**:
| Score | Action |
|-------|--------|
| 18-20 ✅ | Strong signal — proceed to test design |
| 12-17 ⚠️ | Mixed — address weak areas before investing |
| < 12 ❌ | High risk — kill or radically pivot |

---

## Risk Map: The 5 Ways Ideas Die

| Risk | Description | Mitigation |
|------|-------------|------------|
| **Solution Risk** | You build the wrong thing | Talk to 10 customers before writing code |
| **Market Risk** | Nobody wants it | Get pre-orders or sign-ups before building |
| **Execution Risk** | You can't deliver | Audit your skills, time, and resources |
| **Timing Risk** | Too early or too late | Check search trends, competitor launches, industry shifts |
| **Business Risk** | Can't make money | Validate willingness to pay early — don't assume |

---

## Lean Validation Experiments

### Tier 1: Low Effort (Days)

| Experiment | What It Tests | How To Run | Success Signal |
|-----------|---------------|------------|----------------|
| **The Fake Door** | Interest | Landing page with "Coming Soon" + email signup | 5-10% conversion from visitors → email |
| **The $5 Interview** | Problem | Talk to 10 target customers about their pain | 7/10 confirm it's a real problem |
| **Social Post** | Demand | Post about the problem on LinkedIn/Reddit/Twitter | Engagement, DMs, "I need this" comments |
| **Google Trends** | Market trajectory | Check trend direction for related keywords | Upward or stable curve |

### Tier 2: Medium Effort (Weeks)

| Experiment | What It Tests | How To Run | Success Signal |
|-----------|---------------|------------|----------------|
| **Pre-sell / Landing Page** | Willingness to pay | Landing page with "Buy Now" (actually collect payment or just gauge intent) | 1-3% conversion rate or 10+ pre-orders |
| **Concierge MVP** | Solution validity | Manually deliver the service for 3-5 beta customers | Customers get value and would pay |
| **Waitlist** | Demand volume | Collect email signups with a specific promise | 100+ signups from targeted outreach |
| **Content Test** | Content-driven demand | Write 3 articles about the problem. Track SEO/social traction | Organic traffic, subscribers, inquiries |

### Tier 3: Higher Effort (Months)

| Experiment | What It Tests | How To Run | Success Signal |
|-----------|---------------|------------|----------------|
| **Prototype MVP** | Product usability | Build the smallest functional version for 10 beta users | NPS > 30, weekly active usage > 3× |
| **Paid Pilot** | Willingness to pay at full price | Sell to 1-3 customers at full price | Customers pay and don't churn |
| **Crowdfunding / Pre-order** | Market validation at scale | Kickstarter, Indiegogo, or direct pre-orders | Hits 30% of funding target in first week |

---

## Trigger Phrases

| Phrase | Action |
|--------|--------|
| "Validate this idea..." | Full validation funnel: canvas → checklist → risk map → test |
| "Is this worth pursuing?" | Runs the 20-point checklist |
| "Test this idea..." | Designs the smallest meaningful experiment |
| "What could kill this idea?" | Risk map — identifies top 3 failure modes |
| "Should I build this?" | Pre-validation reality check |
| "Talk me out of this idea" | Devil's advocate — surfaces weakest assumptions |
| "How do I validate [X]?" | Specific experiment design for a specific risk |
| "Is this a good idea?" | Combined checklist + risk map + recommendation |

---

## Step-by-Step Instructions

### Step 1: Clarify the Idea

Get it into a single sentence:

> "I want to build **[solution]** for **[audience]** who struggle with **[problem]**, so they can **[outcome]**."

If you can't complete this sentence, the idea isn't clear enough yet.

### Step 2: Surface Assumptions

List everything you're assuming to be true. Group into:

| Assumption Type | Examples |
|-----------------|----------|
| **Problem** | "People actually have this problem." "They know they have it." |
| **Solution** | "My solution solves it." "They'll use it." |
| **Market** | "There are enough people." "I can reach them." |
| **Business** | "They'll pay." "The economics work." |
| **You** | "I can build this." "I'll stay motivated." |

**Key insight**: The assumption that would hurt most if wrong is your **riskiest assumption**. Test that one first.

### Step 3: Run the Checklist

Score all 20 items. Identify which areas score lowest — those are your focus areas for testing.

### Step 4: Design the Experiment

Follow the experiment tier table above. Rules:
- **Smallest test first**: Start with Tier 1. Don't build anything until you've talked to customers.
- **Define success criteria upfront**: "I want 20 email signups from a $50 ad spend" — not "let's see what happens."
- **Time-box**: 1-2 weeks per test. If you can't get a signal in 2 weeks, the signal might be "no."

### Step 5: Run, Measure, Decide

| Result | Decision |
|--------|----------|
| Strong positive signal | Proceed to next tier of testing |
| Mixed / unclear | Revise assumption, test again with a different method |
| Clear negative signal | Kill or pivot. Do not ignore. Sunk cost is not a reason to continue |

### Step 6: Document Learnings

Even for ideas you kill, document what you learned. Future you will benefit from knowing:
- Which assumptions were wrong
- What customers actually said
- What the market signals showed

---

## Examples

### Example 1: Validating a Paid Newsletter Idea

> **Idea**: "A paid newsletter teaching designers how to use AI tools"
>
> **Clarified**: "I want to build a **paid weekly newsletter** for **mid-career designers** who struggle with **keeping up with AI tools**, so they can **stay relevant without spending hours researching**."
>
> **Riskiest Assumptions**: 1) Designers are willing to pay for this. 2) I can consistently find valuable content.
>
> **Experiment (Tier 1)**:
> 1. Post on LinkedIn/X: "Designers — what's your #1 question about AI tools?" (tests problem)
> 2. If engagement is strong → create a free 5-email mini-series with a "Subscribe for full version" CTA (tests willingness to pay)
> 3. Success signal: 1,000 free subscribers within 2 weeks
>
> **If < 100 signups**: Problem not urgent enough or audience not reachable. Kill or narrow niche further.
> **If 100-500**: Interesting but weak. Try paid ads to test willingness to pay more directly.
> **If 500+**: Proceed. Build the paid tier.

### Example 2: Validating a SaaS Tool

> **Idea**: "A tool that auto-generates social media posts from blog content"
>
> **Risk Map**:
> - **Solution Risk** (HIGH): Will the output be good enough to use without heavy editing?
> - **Market Risk** (MEDIUM): Do content creators feel this pain enough to pay?
> - **Execution Risk** (LOW): Buildable with existing AI APIs
>
> **Experiment (Tier 1)**:
> 1. Build a manual concierge: Offer to take 5 bloggers' posts and manually create their social content for free
> 2. Ask: "If this were automated, what would you pay?"
> 3. Success signal: 3/5 say "I'd pay $20+/month"
>
> **Learning**: If users love the output but won't pay, pivot to free + ads. If they won't use the output even for free, solution risk is confirmed — kill or redesign.

---

## Pro Tips

- **Validation is not about proving you're right** — it's about learning the truth as cheaply as possible. If you're trying to prove your idea works, you're doing it wrong.
- **Nobody cares about your idea as much as you do**. The first 10 conversations will be polite. Push past politeness — ask "Would you pay for this?" directly. If they hesitate, that's data.
- **A "maybe" is a "no"**. In validation, ambiguous responses usually mean no. People who really want something will show clear enthusiasm.
- **Kill early, kill often**. The best entrepreneurs don't have the best ideas — they kill bad ideas fastest. A dead idea is tuition paid for the next one.
- **Validation never ends**. Even after launch, every feature, pricing change, and channel is a new hypothesis to test. Build validation into your workflow, not as a one-time event.

