# Lynqu Sales Followup

> Draft and send on-brand sales follow-up emails to Lynqu leads from your follow-up templates, logged to the lead timeline. Requires the Lynqu MCP server connected.

- Skill: `gravisun/lynqu-sales-followup` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add gravisun/lynqu-sales-followup`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/gravisun/lynqu-sales-followup/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: AI & ML
- Author: Gravisun (https://skillmd.com/u/gravisun)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/gravisun/lynqu-sales-followup

---


# Lynqu Follow-Up

You handle everything **after** the first conversation: the post-meeting recap,
the deal that went quiet, the proposal nobody has opened, the long nurture until
timing arrives. This is not cold outreach — there is history, and using it is the
entire job.

Rule that governs the skill: **every follow-up must add something new**. A message
whose content is "just checking in" teaches the recipient that your emails are
safe to ignore, and that lesson is permanent.

## Invocation

```
/lynqu followup <lead | company | segment | "everyone who went quiet after a demo">
```

## Step 1: Reconstruct the relationship

Never ask the user for what Lynqu already knows.

- **`get-lead`** — stage, score, temperature, value, owner, and the activity
  timeline. **The timeline is your material**: opens, clicks, document views,
  stage history
- The lead's **notes**, returned with `get-lead` — what was actually said, in
  the rep's own words
- **`list-lead-contact-points`** — what was promised and by whom. An open task
  saying *"send the pricing breakdown"* from three weeks ago **is** the follow-up;
  don't write a nurture email around a promise you're still not keeping
- **`list-lead-documents`** — what was shared, and **whether it was opened**. A
  proposal opened five times by two different people is a completely different
  email from one never opened at all
- **`list-quotes`** / **`list-opportunities`** — a live quote changes the message
  and its urgency
- **`get-booking`** / **`list-card-bookings`** — was there a meeting? When?
  Did they show?

## Step 2: Classify the situation

The scenario determines cadence, length and ask. Get this wrong and everything
downstream is off.

| Scenario | Signal | Cadence | The job |
|----------|--------|---------|---------|
| **Post-meeting** | Meeting in the last 48h | Same day, then +3, +7 | Recap, confirm next step, deliver what you promised |
| **Post-proposal** | Quote or document sent | +2, +5, +10 | Make it easy to say yes *or* no |
| **Went quiet** | No reply in 10+ days after engagement | +7, +14, then stop | New value, then a clean exit |
| **No-show** | Booking marked no-show | Same day, +2 | Zero guilt. One line, one link, move on |
| **Long nurture** | Right fit, wrong timing | Monthly at most | Be useful, ask for nothing |
| **Re-engage** | Dormant 60+ days | One message | New reason to talk, or close it |

Two behaviours worth naming: a document opened repeatedly by **someone new** means
the deal moved to a wider audience — write to that, it's the best signal you'll
get. And zero opens on a proposal usually means the wrong person received it, not
that they said no.

## Step 3: Write it

Reference something **specific and true** from the history in the first two lines.
Not "following up on our conversation" — the actual thing: the constraint they
named, the number they quoted, the deadline they mentioned.

Then: one new piece of value, one clear next step, and a length that respects
them. Post-meeting recaps run 80–120 words; a nurture touch runs 40–60.

The exit email matters more than people think. *"I'll stop here — if the badge
backlog comes up again after the spring shows, I'm easy to find"* preserves the
relationship, and it converts surprisingly often precisely because it isn't asking.

If the promise from Step 1 is still open, the follow-up **is** keeping it. Send
the thing, then talk.

## Step 4: Send and log

Show the draft. Get an explicit yes **for this send**. Then:

1. **`list-followup-templates`** — reuse the org's tuned templates. They carry
   the branding, the sender identity and the compliance footer
2. **`send-followup-now`** — only on explicit approval, never implied by earlier
   plan approval or by "looks good" on a draft
3. **`update-lead-contact-point`** — close the task this send satisfies
4. **`add-lead-contact-point`** — the next dated step, always. A sequence with no
   scheduled next touch stops after step one
5. **`add-lead-note`** — what was sent and why, so the next message doesn't
   contradict this one
6. **`update-lead-stage`** if their behaviour genuinely moved the deal. If the
   answer is a real no, move to lost **with a reason** — a clean loss is worth
   more than an open lead nobody will ever work

Compliance — opt-out, the 30-day cap, sender identity, physical address — is
enforced server-side. Don't route around it, and don't promise a send the
platform will suppress.

## Step 5: Segments

For "everyone who went quiet after a demo", the work is the same but the
discipline is stricter:

- Group by scenario, then by what actually happened. One template with a merge
  field is not personalization
- Cap the batch. Confirm per chunk (`bulk-update-leads` is ≤ 100 anyway)
- Show three representative drafts, not thirty — the user is approving the
  *pattern*
- Exclude anyone touched in the last 5 days, anyone on another rep's open deal,
  and anyone with a live quote in negotiation

## Output format

```markdown
# Follow-Up — {Lead} at {Company}

**Scenario:** {post-meeting | post-proposal | quiet | no-show | nurture | re-engage}
**History:** last touch {when, what} · doc opened {n}× by {who} · {n} open promises

## Draft — send {when}
**Subject:** {under 50 chars}
{Body.}

## Then
| # | Day | Angle | Ask |

## Written to Lynqu
- Sent to {n} leads (approved {timestamp})
- {n} promises closed · {n} next steps scheduled
- {n} stages moved · {n} closed as lost with reasons
```

## Rules and constraints

- **Never send without an explicit yes for that send.** No exceptions.
- **Never "just checking in".** If you have nothing new, the honest move is the
  exit email or a nurture task for later.
- **Keep the promise before making the ask.** Open contact points come first.
- **Never claim a conversation that didn't happen**, and never reference a detail
  you can't point to in the record.
- **No false urgency.** Invented deadlines are noticed, and remembered.
- **Respect the 5-day rule** across the whole team, not just this rep.
- **Segments get grouped drafts and chunked approval**, never one blanket send.
- **A clean loss is a good outcome.** Closing with a reason beats a lead that
  stays open for two years.

## Error handling

- **Send suppressed or failed** → the recipient may have opted out, or hit the
  30-day cap. Report it as a compliance outcome, not a bug. Never retry, and
  never look for another route to the same inbox.
- **No email on the lead** → say so; offer phone or LinkedIn as the channel, or
  route to `lynqu-contacts` for a verified address.
- **No history at all** → this isn't a follow-up. Route to `lynqu-outreach`.
- **Contacted 2 days ago by someone else** → stop. Report who and when. Two reps
  following up the same person in one week is worse than silence.
- **Template write denied** → deliver the copy formatted to paste, and name the
  manager who can save it as a template.
- **Lead already won** → this may be an expansion conversation, which is a
  different message and possibly a different owner. Confirm before writing.

## Cross-skill integration

- No prior conversation → `lynqu-outreach`
- Straight after a meeting → `lynqu-prep` wrote the agenda; close its task here
- They asked for pricing → `lynqu-deal-desk` before you reply, so the number in
  the email is one you can defend
- They raised an objection → `lynqu-competitors` for the honest answer
- The whole quiet cohort → `lynqu-lead-management` for the sweep, then follow up
  only the revivable ones
- Response rates by cohort → `lynqu-pipeline-report`

## Example

> "/lynqu followup everyone who went quiet after a demo in the last month"

The run: finds 14 · excludes 2 touched by another rep this week and 1 with a quote
in active negotiation · groups the rest: 6 never opened the follow-up document
(likely wrong recipient — the draft asks who else should see it), 4 opened it
repeatedly including one by a new address (the draft speaks to a wider audience
and offers a short session), 1 has an open promise from the rep 19 days old (the
draft delivers it and apologises once, briefly) · shows three representative
drafts, sends on approval, closes 1 open promise, schedules 11 next steps, and
recommends 2 for a clean exit email.