# Oss Standards > Pre-PR discipline for a public-by-default repo. What a reviewer enforces beyond CI: secrets and internal data in diffs or screenshots, docs that name their reader, and the cleaning pass where incomplete or confusing artifacts get dropped. Use before opening any PR against `gridaco/nothing` or when finalizing work for review. - Skill: `gridaco/oss-standards` (Agent Skill) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add gridaco/oss-standards` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/gridaco/oss-standards/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Coding & Dev Tools - Author: gridaco (https://skillmd.com/u/gridaco) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/gridaco/oss-standards --- # oss-standards Grida is open source. CI checks catch the mechanical failures — format, lint, typecheck, tests, typos, generated-file freshness. This skill is the _extra_ bar a reviewer enforces because the repo is public, the threat model is public, and the audience for every artifact in a PR includes a stranger who arrived via Google. The defaults that flip: - **Public-by-default.** Names, comments, fixtures, screenshots, commit messages — assume a stranger reads them first. There is no internal channel; everything is the channel. - **Push = publish.** A secret in a branch push is a published secret, even if you delete the commit five minutes later. "I'll redact before merge" is not a plan; rotation is. - **Incomplete is worse than absent.** "I'll finish it next PR" lands on `main`, gets indexed, and becomes the example the next contributor copies. Use `draft: true`, defer the PR, or just don't ship — but don't ship half. ## Code Beyond what CI catches and what `CLAUDE.md` / `naming` / `code-ts` / `code-react` already enforce: - **No personal TODOs.** `// TODO(me): …`, "fix later", "@username knows" — private notes published. Either resolve, or rewrite as a neutral TODO with a tracking issue link. - **No machine-specific paths.** See the [`links`](../links/SKILL.md) pre-commit gate — absolute paths, `~/scratch/...`, `/tmp/...`, and untracked references resolve to nothing for anyone else. - **One concern per PR.** A reviewer in public cannot accept half a PR; bundled unrelated changes are unreviewable. Split or rebase. - **New public surface is a semver commitment.** YAGNI applies everywhere, but in OSS the cost of adding an exported name today is the deprecation path you owe tomorrow. Wait for the second caller. For bug fixes specifically, the [`etiology`](../etiology/SKILL.md) skill is mandatory — bandaids in `main` become tribal knowledge that external contributors have no access to. ## Security The full boundary discipline lives in the [`security`](https://github.com/gridaco/grida/blob/main/.agents/skills/security/SKILL.md) skill — `GRIDA-SEC-` tags, the mandatory review before commit. Two extra OSS gates on top, both because _push = publish_: - **Secrets in diffs, fixtures, or tests.** Any credential, signing key, Stripe/Metronome id, webhook signature, or production-shaped URL committed has been published the moment the branch is pushed. Use `.env.local` (gitignored) and fixture placeholders. - **Internal URLs and screenshots.** Webhook URLs, dev-tunnel URLs, staging hosts, dashboard links, and screenshots that show real org slugs, account ids, or tenant data leak the same way. A doc PR with a real org slug visible in the screenshot chrome is a published org slug. If a `GRIDA-SEC-` tag appears anywhere in your diff, the `security` skill's review runs first; this skill's cleaning pass is downstream of that. ## Docs and prose Anything user-facing — README, `docs/**`, blog post, in-product copy, the PR description itself — has an audience that doesn't share your context. **Name the reader before writing.** One sentence: "an external contributor first opening the repo," "a designer evaluating Grida vs Figma," "an agent grounding before a refactor." If you can't name the reader, the page doesn't know what it is — and that surfaces as prose that hedges, repeats, or assumes. - **No "we know that…" prose.** "We" is the maintainers; the reader is someone else. Explain the fact or link to where it lives. - **No private references.** Slack threads, internal tickets, "as we discussed" — invisible to the reader. - **Link form follows the rendering surface.** See the [`links`](../links/SKILL.md) skill — local-only or untracked targets are correctness bugs in OSS, not style. - **Ship-or-draft is the doc taxonomy gate.** `draft: true` is the honest answer when a page isn't useful enough yet; shipping a half-page because "something is better than nothing" is not. See [`docs/AGENTS.md`](https://github.com/gridaco/grida/blob/main/docs/AGENTS.md). ## The cleaning pass Final pass before opening the PR. For every file touched, ask literally: > If a stranger reads this file with no context, does it help them, or > does it leave a question they cannot answer? Apply the answer: - **Helps → keep.** - **Recoverable question → fix it** (rename, expand the doc, add the one comment that explains the non-obvious constraint). - **Unrecoverable question → drop** the file, the code block, the doc section, the fixture, the screenshot. The bias is to drop. A confusing artifact in `main` outlives the PR and is the first thing the next contributor finds when they grep. Common removals on this pass: - Scratch files committed by mistake (`tmp.ts`, `notes.md`, unnamed fixtures, snapshots from a one-off debug run). - Half-written doc pages with no audience or no conclusion — `draft: true` or delete. - TODO blocks that reference internal context. - Examples or fixtures that don't run or aren't referenced. - Inline comments that paraphrase code instead of stating the non-obvious _why_ (per the repo-wide rule in `CLAUDE.md`). ## The PR description and commit message These are public artifacts permanently linked from the diff. - **Commit message** makes `git log` a useful index. `"fix"` is not a commit message; neither is `"updates"`. - **PR description** lets a future contributor reconstruct _why_ the change exists without reading the diff line by line. Bug fix → name the diagnostic-ladder rung (`etiology`). Feature → name the audience and the concrete use case that pulled it in. ## The short version - Public-by-default. Push = publish. Nothing is internal. - CI catches the mechanical. This skill catches the rest. - Secrets, internal URLs, machine paths, screenshots with real data — published on push; rotation is the only remedy. - Docs name the reader, or they don't know what they are. - Final pass: every artifact justifies itself to a stranger, or it drops. Bias is to drop. - The PR description and commit message are the permanent index. Write them as such. See also: [`security`](https://github.com/gridaco/grida/blob/main/.agents/skills/security/SKILL.md), [`links`](../links/SKILL.md), [`etiology`](../etiology/SKILL.md), [`naming`](../naming/SKILL.md), [`code-ts`](https://github.com/gridaco/grida/blob/main/.agents/skills/code-ts/SKILL.md), [`code-react`](https://github.com/gridaco/grida/blob/main/.agents/skills/code-react/SKILL.md), [`pedantic`](../pedantic/SKILL.md) (when you want a hard critique before opening the PR).