# Review It > Manual-only graded review gate for a finished change: risk grade, one simplify pass, one graded LLM review round, one material correction batch, then a receipt. Leaves a clean local HEAD and never pushes, opens, or merges anything. Invoke only when the user explicitly names review-it or an explicitly invoked workflow delegates its graded gate. - Skill: `hcaiano/review-it` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 17 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add hcaiano/review-it` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/hcaiano/review-it/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: AI & ML - Author: hcaiano (https://skillmd.com/u/hcaiano) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/hcaiano/review-it --- # Review Gate Grade a finished change, simplify it, review it, and correct what the review finds. The gate ends at a clean local HEAD and a `## Review gate` receipt. It never pushes, opens or updates a PR, waits on CI, merges, or deploys. That restraint is what makes it safe to run against a branch whose PR already exists: it changes only the working tree and the local history its corrections require. Run it only when the user invokes review-it or ship-it delegates its graded gate — finishing a change is not an invitation to review it. ## Fix the range first Every later step reads the same range. Resolve it once, name it to the user, and never recompute it mid-gate: - default — the merge base with the target branch. `git fetch origin ` first and take the merge base against `origin/`; a stale local target reviews another PR's commits. - an explicit commit, when re-reviewing one landed change. - the uncommitted working tree, when nothing is committed yet. Mark each intended untracked path with `git add --intent-to-add -- ` so simplification and review see the complete change; never do this to unrelated files. The gate assumes its caller already proved the change: the smallest repository-defined checks covering every changed contract and its changed direct consumers pass on this range. Standalone, run them before grading. A gate over an unproven range reviews a moving target. Read pool capacity before committing any review pool: run `node scripts/usage-state.mjs` from the orchestrate skill installed alongside this one. A pool is out of headroom at `used_percent` ≥ 90 or when its CLI is observed refusing. A pool with `pace` above 1 is protected because its projected spend reaches 100% before reset. A null reading never degrades on its own. A stale protected or out-of-headroom reading remains actionable because it is a lower bound, not proof that the pool cooled. Do not start automatic work on a protected pool. An explicit user instruction to use it overrides protection after you state its use, pace, and reset; it does not override a refusal. That helper is a sibling skill, not a bundled one. When it is not installed, record `Gate: — pool state unread (usage-state.mjs not installed)` and run the grade's required reviewers anyway. A missing capacity reading leaves the semantic grade, the reviewer count, and simplify exactly as graded; only an observed CLI refusal degrades execution. Before starting any simplify or review command, read and follow [process transport](references/visible-herdr-runs.md). An interactive slash command in the current agent pane is already visible; every external Claude, Codex, or Cursor command runs through the transport. The transport records whether it ran in a visible Herdr pane or as a local background process. The visible backend needs `pair` installed beside this skill for its caller-pane proof, and the transport reference owns backend selection. Outside `HERDR_ENV=1` it uses `local`. A no-TTY headless pair executor can inherit `HERDR_ENV=1`; when its active pair turn proves that process context, it also uses `local`. An interactive Herdr lead uses the visible backend, and a missing caller proof stops that gate. Tell the interactive lead to install `pair` instead of hiding its run. Done when the range, the pool state, and any required transport pin are explicit. ## 1. Grade Grade the complete proven diff by its semantics: - `skip` — a non-runtime change, or a mechanical low-risk runtime change, whose specification is closed and whose focused proof covers every altered behavior. It runs no simplify and no LLM review. - `single` — a normal runtime change contained within one subsystem. - `dual` — auth, permissions, security, payments, migrations, destructive data, infrastructure, concurrency, public contracts, cross-service or multi-subsystem changes; ambiguous requirements; or a blast radius that focused proof cannot bound. Staffing, implementing model, and use of a pair never choose the grade or number of reviews. An explicit user grade is a floor. A caller's issue-time grade is provisional: regrade the actual diff here and record why it stayed the same, rose, or fell. Any uncertainty about satisfying `skip` promotes to `single`; any uncertainty about subsystem containment, requirements, or blast radius promotes to `dual`. After the semantic grade is fixed, choose from native Claude, native Codex, and eligible Cursor-hosted reviewers whose mapped Cursor pool is available. `single` prefers a model family that did not implement the change, then the highest tier, lower pace, and lower used percentage. `dual` requires two model families. Prefer different harnesses, but two fresh Cursor sessions with different eligible families satisfy it when Cursor is the only sustainable harness. A protected or out-of-headroom pool is excluded from automatic staffing. Use a same-bar substitute first. If none exists, take this gate's capacity path without asking: skip protected Claude simplify; keep `single` at one available reviewer; and reduce `dual` to one available reviewer covering both axes. Cursor Grok may cover one degraded review through `cursor.cursor_models`; D-tier Composer and all Google models are ineligible. Ask whether to spend a protected pool or wait for reset only when no eligible unprotected reviewer remains. Capacity changes execution, not the semantic grade. Tell the user the candidate grade, measured states, and every capacity reduction. Done when the candidate grade and every capacity reduction are recorded. ## 2. Simplify Name one concrete structural target: duplicated production logic, avoidable cross-file indirection, or complex branching/state orchestration. Run `/simplify` only when that named target makes a behavior-preserving reduction likely; size alone is not a target. Choose a recorded simplify skip when there is no concrete target, when the grade is `skip`, or when the change's core surface is docs/Markdown/config, generated output, migrations, schemas/contracts, allowlists, or security/performance guards. A user-requested simplify pass overrides every one of those eligibility skips, at any grade including `skip` — the user asking for it is the target. Simplify is independent of reviewer count. An eligible pass runs once per gate, before review so reviewers see the resulting diff. Claude being unavailable, protected, or `claude.pace` above 1 records a capacity skip and continues to the selected available reviewer without asking to spend Claude. Skip an existing receipt only when its `Simplify:` line names the current clean review HEAD and the complete diff has not changed, or proves an applicable eligibility skip. A failed or aborted attempt is not success. Otherwise have Claude run its native `/simplify` command on the proven diff: - When Claude is driving, invoke `/simplify` directly in its visible pane. In a live pair, Codex may ask the Claude peer to do the same. - Otherwise launch the bundled wrapper through the transport. The wrapper owns the baseline patch, liveness deadline, kill, verified restore, content validation, and leftover-untracked report: `node /scripts/headless-claude.mjs "/simplify" --writable true --receipt `. Exit 0 with `{ok: true}` is the only success. On `{ok: false}` the tree is already restored (a `restore_error` means it is NOT — inspect before touching anything). Record `failed — ` on the receipt's `Simplify:` line, mark Claude unavailable, and apply step 1's capacity rules without changing the semantic grade. Continue only when step 1 selects an eligible unprotected reviewer; otherwise stop. On success, keep Claude's changes in the working tree. Done when simplify has a successful receipt naming the structural target, a recorded eligibility or capacity skip, or a failed attempt whose recorded capacity disposition preserves the semantic grade. ## 3. Finalize the review HEAD When simplify ran, inspect every edit and rerun the focused tests and checks affected by it. Reapply step 1's risk grade to the resulting complete diff and record the final grade plus any change from the candidate. Commit only what this gate is entitled to commit. When the range is a branch, create clear, intentional local commits and reach a clean review HEAD without pushing. When the range is the uncommitted working tree, that tree is the review HEAD: review it in place and commit nothing the gate did not itself produce — a `skip` grade over uncommitted work commits nothing at all. Done when the final diff has focused proof, no correction the gate made is left uncommitted on a branch range, and the review grade is explicit. ## 4. Review Standards and Spec Review on that exact review HEAD. `skip` records its semantic reason and runs no review. `single` and a capacity-reduced `dual` use one fresh available reviewer to cover **Standards + Spec**; the preferred family being protected never blocks that available reviewer. A full `dual` assigns one reviewer to **Standards** (correctness, security, regressions, repository conventions, and test quality) and the other to **Spec** (requested behavior, acceptance criteria, scope, and applicable source documents). Two reviews from the same model family do not satisfy `dual`. A `single` reviewer promotes the gate before any correction when it finds a valid material issue that crosses into the other axis, discovers a `dual` signal from step 1, finds conflicting source authority, or cannot confidently close either axis. Run the missing reviewer against the same review HEAD; a local, bounded finding stays `single`. Apply the capacity degradation from step 1 if promotion cannot reach both pools, and record it. A one-review gate stops if its review cannot complete and never regrades to another agent. A `dual` with only one eligible unprotected reviewer starts that review directly and records capacity-reduced execution. A full `dual` whose second review cannot complete preserves its semantic grade and records the completed reviewer alone in the receipt. A review completes on content: a refusal, rate-limit notice, or empty payload is a failed review even with exit zero. Rerun it or apply the capacity degradation under these rules; never count it. In-flight feedback from implementation is not this fresh final-diff gate. Use each agent's native command surface, not an assumed repository skill: - Claude Code: invoke the `/code-review` slash command itself on Opus in Claude's visible agent pane, or launch `node /scripts/headless-claude.mjs "/code-review" --receipt ` through the transport (read-only plan mode). This gate is satisfied only by running `/code-review` in full; nothing improvised stands in for it. - Codex: launch the bundled `node /scripts/headless-codex.mjs "" --base origin/` wrapper through the transport. The wrapper resolves the merge base before the review starts, pins that range in the prompt, and records the resolved SHA in its receipt, so the reviewed range is a fact rather than an instruction the model may skip. Use its `--commit` or `--uncommitted` selector when the gate's range is one of those. `codex exec` with a freeform prompt does not satisfy this gate. - Cursor fallback: launch the bundled `node /scripts/headless-cursor.mjs "" --model --base origin/` wrapper through the transport. It uses a fresh read-only plan-mode session, resolves and records the same range contract, fingerprints the tree, and requires non-empty output. Use its `--commit` or `--uncommitted` selector for those ranges. Map the model to `cursor.cursor_models` or `cursor.other_models` before launch. `{ok: true}` with a non-empty result is the only pass for any wrapper. Name the assigned axis in the reviewer's prompt, include its applicable sources, and require read-only findings output. An improvised read-through of the diff does not count. Model budget: native Claude uses Opus (`--model opus`); native Codex uses its default model with no extra-high reasoning. Cursor uses the highest-tier eligible live-catalog model in an available Cursor pool: Fable or Sol in `other_models`, or Cursor Grok as the lower-bar degraded fallback in `cursor_models`. Google models never run. `dual` only — start the Standards and Spec reviews in distinct panes before waiting for either. In a `pair` session, ask the Claude peer through the pair channel to run its visible native slash command when applicable; external commands still use the transport. Done when every required axis has valid findings output against the same review HEAD. ## 5. Correct material findings in one batch A `skip` gate writes its receipt and finishes. Every reviewed gate merges and deduplicates the findings, verifies each against the real code path, and applies every valid, material, in-scope correction in one batch. Discard style nits and out-of-scope suggestions, recording useful follow-ups instead. A correction that requires a new contract or architecture, or roughly doubles the diff, is a follow-up that stops the gate for user direction. The gate gets one LLM review round. A second, final review round happens only when the correction batch substantially changes behavior, expands the authorized scope, or introduces a new security or architectural risk. Run that conditional review against the complete corrected diff on the applicable axes. A changed SHA, ordinary implementation edits, or the possibility of further polish does not trigger it. Apply any valid, material, in-scope findings from that conditional review in one batch without a third review. If those corrections themselves require another qualifying behavior, scope, security, or architecture change, stop for user direction instead of opening another review cycle. Rerun the affected focused proof, then reach the end state this gate's range allows: on a branch range, commit all corrections and reach a clean final HEAD; on an uncommitted range, leave the corrections in the working tree beside the work already there, since committing is what step 3 withheld. Done when every finding has a disposition, the conditional review decision is recorded, focused proof passes, and the gate's end state matches its range. ## 6. Write the receipt Leave a `## Review gate` receipt. A caller that delivers this change embeds the block verbatim rather than restating it. - `Gate:` — `skip — ` / `single — ; ` / `dual` / semantic grade plus any degraded execution and reason. - `Risk:` — the semantic classification signals and known or unbounded blast radius. - `Regrade:` — why the actual final diff stayed at, rose above, or fell below the provisional grade. - `Simplify:` — `applied in — target: ` / `already run` / `skipped — ` / `failed — `. - `Reviewed HEAD:` — the 40-character last gate-reviewed SHA, an ancestor of the final HEAD whenever the gate found anything. - `Gate HEAD:` — the 40-character clean SHA this gate ends on. On an uncommitted range, the unchanged SHA the reviewed tree sits on, written ` — uncommitted` so no caller reads it as a shippable head. - Each reviewer, its native command, assigned axis, finding count, and each finding's disposition (`fixed in ` / `deferred to #N` / discarded reason), plus whether the conditional review ran and why. - Every transport run: its transport, label, and matching completion receipt. Confirm each finished visible pane was closed after its artifacts were validated. `Reviewed HEAD` and `Gate HEAD` are the gate's chain of custody — reviewed at this ancestor, fixed in these SHAs — so a corrected gate is expected to carry two different HEADs. A skipped gate states its reason. Done when the receipt truthfully separates review evidence from the HEAD the gate ends on, and every finding has a disposition. ## Report Give the user the receipt summary, the final grade and any capacity degradation, each finding discarded or deferred, and the exact HEAD the gate ends on — naming the uncommitted corrections still in the working tree when the range was one. Say plainly that nothing was pushed and no PR was touched, and name what the change still needs to ship.