# Valuation Assessment

> Analyze valuation metrics (P/E, PEG, P/S) to assess fair value

- Skill: `huskydanny/valuation-assessment` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add huskydanny/valuation-assessment`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/huskydanny/valuation-assessment/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: AI & ML
- Author: HuskyDanny (https://skillmd.com/u/huskydanny)
- Updated: 2026-09-10
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/huskydanny/valuation-assessment

---


## Valuation Assessment Workflow

OBJECTIVE: Determine if the stock is attractively valued.

### Step 1: Get Valuation Metrics
- Use `get_company_overview` for current metrics:
  - P/E Ratio (trailing and forward)
  - PEG Ratio (growth-adjusted P/E)
  - Price/Sales, Price/Book
  - EV/EBITDA

### Step 2: Context Analysis
- Compare P/E to sector average (is it premium or discount?)
- Check forward P/E vs trailing (market expects growth or decline?)
- PEG < 1 suggests undervalued; PEG > 2 suggests expensive

### Step 3: Valuation Verdict
- UNDERVALUED: Multiple metrics below sector, strong fundamentals
- FAIR VALUE: Metrics in line with sector and growth
- OVERVALUED: Premium valuation needs justification
- SPECULATIVE: High multiples require exceptional growth

### Output Format
Valuation Summary: [SYMBOL]
P/E: {trailing} (TTM) | {forward} (FWD) | Sector Avg: {sector}
PEG Ratio: {peg} -> [ATTRACTIVE/FAIR/EXPENSIVE]
Verdict: [UNDERVALUED/FAIR/OVERVALUED/SPECULATIVE]
Key Insight: [Why this valuation makes sense or doesn't]