# Public Technology Review

> Build a vendor-neutral, source-linked public-technology procurement evidence and risk review without autonomous scoring or award recommendations.

- Skill: `jmagly/public-technology-review` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add jmagly/public-technology-review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/jmagly/public-technology-review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: jmagly (https://skillmd.com/u/jmagly)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/jmagly/public-technology-review

---


# Public Technology Review

## Process

1. Select and cite the governing procurement profile; FAR/NIST are reference
   models unless adopted by that jurisdiction.
2. Inventory need, planning, market research, solicitation, selection, award,
   administration, oversight, and public-release records.
3. Separate protected proposals/source-selection material from public releases.
4. Record claims and evidence without sentiment scores. Risk ratings require a
   human-defined scale, rationale, uncertainty, owner, and verification method.
5. Do not infer corruption, rank vendors, or recommend an award autonomously.
6. Record explicit handoff states for missing records, meeting/vote analysis,
   and any publication packet; protected material never enters a public handoff.

## Output

A schema-valid evidence/risk review and human decision questions.

## References

- `schemas/public-technology-review.schema.json`
- `templates/public-technology-review.md`
- `docs/research/civic-workflow-standards.md`
- `docs/research/control-source-matrix.md`