# Reflection

> Structured self-evaluation before delivering work. Catches blind spots and improves quality through multi-lens critique.

- Skill: `johnalbertini14-glitch/reflection` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 4 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add johnalbertini14-glitch/reflection`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/johnalbertini14-glitch/reflection/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: johnalbertini14-glitch (https://skillmd.com/u/johnalbertini14-glitch)
- Updated: 2026-09-08
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/johnalbertini14-glitch/reflection

---


## When to Use

Before delivering important work, pause for structured self-evaluation. Catches blind spots, improves quality, builds trust.

Triggers:
- Complex deliverables (architecture, strategy, analysis)
- High-stakes outputs (production code, client-facing docs)
- Uncertainty about quality ("is this actually good?")
- After extended work sessions (tunnel vision risk)

## The Reflection Process

**1. Distance** — Step back mentally. Pretend you're reviewing someone else's work.

**2. Multi-lens evaluation:**
- **Correctness**: Does it actually solve the problem stated?
- **Completeness**: What's missing? Edge cases? Assumptions?
- **Clarity**: Would someone else understand this immediately?
- **Robustness**: What could go wrong? What breaks this?

**3. Steel-man critique** — Find the strongest objection to your work. Address it.

**4. Honest assessment** — Rate confidence 1-10. Below 7? State what would raise it.

## Reflection Depth

| Situation | Depth |
|-----------|-------|
| Quick answer | 10 seconds, one lens |
| Standard task | 30 seconds, all lenses |
| Critical delivery | 2 minutes, full critique |

## Red Flags to Catch

- First solution accepted without alternatives considered
- Assumptions not validated with user
- Edge cases hand-waved
- Complexity added without clear benefit
- "It works" without understanding why

## Output Format

After reflection, either:
1. **Deliver with confidence** — reflection confirmed quality
2. **Improve then deliver** — found issues, fixed them
3. **Flag uncertainty** — "I'm 6/10 confident because X, want me to dig deeper?"

See `dimensions.md` for domain-specific evaluation criteria.
See `prompts.md` for self-reflection questions by task type.

---
*Related: diverge (multiple perspectives), brainstorm (idea generation)*