# Jiang Irac Nonuse Evidence > name: jiang-nonuse - Skill: `kernel8901/jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 14 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add kernel8901/jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/kernel8901/jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Coding & Dev Tools - Author: kernel8901 (https://skillmd.com/u/kernel8901) - Updated: 2026-09-17 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/kernel8901/jiang-irac-nonuse-evidence --- name: jiang-nonuse description: CNIPA撤三（连续三年不使用）双轨证据引擎：答辩证据链构建 + 质证审计（SJ-6 + IRAC + 风险A–E）。 homepage: https://github.com/jiangzhongling/jiang-nonuse metadata: clawdbot: emoji: "🧾" tags: - trademark - cnipa - nonuse - evidence - sj-irac - cancellation - legal-ai --- # SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine（撤三证据推理系统） Professional Release v2.0.0 Author: Jiang Zhongling（商标蒋道理） Organization: Nantong Zhongnan Quansheng IP Co., Ltd. Last Updated: 2026-02-04 --- ## 1. System Positioning SJ-IRAC Non-Use Engine is a professional-grade evidence reasoning and document production system for CNIPA 3-year non-use cancellation proceedings. This system is designed to produce examiner-oriented, period-centered, legally structured defense and cross-examination outputs. Core Objective: Transform scattered evidence into a continuous, verifiable, legally sufficient use chain. --- ## 2. Problems Addressed This system focuses on eliminating decisive failure causes in non-use cases: - Fragmented period coverage - Time-segment discontinuity - Evidence–period mismatch - Unmapped proof elements - Pseudo-commercial transactions - Weak examiner persuasion --- ## 3. System Architecture Core Principle: Period → Evidence → Elements → Logic → Risk → Decision → Document --- ## 4. Legal & Evidence Constitution ### 4.1 Applicable Law - PRC Trademark Law (2019) - Implementing Regulations - CNIPA Guidelines - Nice Classification Trademark use must satisfy: - Real commercial activity - Public market exposure - Verifiable records - Continuous within period - Linked to designated goods/services --- ### 4.2 No-Fabrication Rule Prohibited: - Invented transactions - Fabricated invoices/contracts - Backdated materials - Editable screenshots - Narrative-only statements Each exhibit must show: Source / Date / Carrier / Proof Purpose --- ### 4.3 SJ-6 Evidence Chain All exhibits are evaluated by: 1. Authenticity 2. Relevance 3. Completeness 4. Temporal Validity 5. Logical Consistency 6. Resistance Non-qualified items are excluded. --- ### 4.4 Core Proof Targets (T1–T6) | Code | Target | |------|--------| | T1 | User identity | | T2 | Mark form | | T3 | Goods/services | | T4 | Time / Period | | T5 | Commercial context | | T6 | Transaction loop | Missing targets → mandatory risk escalation. --- ### 4.5 Designated Period Control Rule（指定期间控制规则） All defense outputs must demonstrate continuous commercial use within the designated three-year period. Mandatory segmentation: P1: First 12 months P2: Middle 12 months P3: Last 12 months Rules: - Each segment must contain ≥1 valid commercial-use proof - Any empty segment triggers G1 escalation - Two or more empty segments → fatal defect Zero-gap continuity is the primary examination anchor. --- ### 4.6 Period–Element Binding Rule Each exhibit must be mapped as: Date → Period Segment → T4 → Goods → Mark → Transaction Unmapped evidence = invalid. --- ## 5. Workflow Architecture (SJ-REVOKE OS) ### Phase 0 — Admission Feasibility + Cost + Period Risk ### Phase 1 — Inventory Registration + Period Segmentation + SJ-6 ### Phase 2 — Chaining Period → Transaction → Mark → Goods ### Phase 3 — Risk Audit Period / Subject / Mapping / Authenticity ### Phase 4 — Strategy Reinforce / Supplement / Stop-loss ### Phase 5 — Drafting Period-driven automation ### Phase 6 — QC Continuity + Readability ### Phase 7 — Archive Review + Reuse No skipping permitted. --- ## 6. Risk & Stop-Loss Engine ### 6.1 Risk Levels | Level | Meaning | |-------|---------| | A | Full period coverage + strong loop | | B | Minor gaps, repairable | | C | Partial period missing | | D | Structural weakness | | E | Fatal discontinuity | --- ### 6.2 Kill Gates - G1 Period fatal - G2 Goods fatal - G3 Mark fatal - G4 Subject fatal - G5 Chain fatal - G6 Authenticity fatal --- ### 6.3 Output Each case outputs: Decision + Level + Period Map + Risk Points + Actions --- ## 7. Dual-Track System ### 7.1 Defensive Track（被申请人端） Goal: Period continuity + Closed commercial loop Minimum Chain: Mark + Goods + Period + Transaction --- ### 7.2 Offensive Track（申请人端） Focus: Break period continuity and element linkage Priority: Time → Subject → Goods → Loop → Authenticity --- ## 8. Evidence Index Standard (SJ-6 Mandatory) ### 8.1 Binding Rule All submissions must include a Period-Mapped SJ-6 Index. --- ### 8.2 Mandatory Fields 1. ID 2. Name 3. Source 4. Date 5. Period Segment 6. Goods 7. Target 8. SJ-6 9. Pages 10. Risk --- ### 8.3 Template | ID | Name | Date | Period | Goods | Target | SJ6 | Pages | Risk | |----|------|------|--------|-------|--------|-----|-------|------| --- ### 8.4 Grouping - P1 Evidence - P2 Evidence - P3 Evidence All mandatory. --- ## 9. Standard Deliverables | Item | Must Include | |------|--------------| | Period Matrix | Yes | | Timeline | Yes | | Risk Map | Yes | | IRAC | Yes | | Draft | Yes | No partial submission. --- ## 10. Input & Invocation ### 10.1 Inputs - Reg No - Class - Goods - Period - Evidence - Opponent (opt) Missing period info → reject. --- ### 10.2 Modes - build (defense) - audit (attack) --- ## 11. Non-Suitable Cases - Period blank ≥2 segments - No objective proof - Dormant entities - Proven fraud - Cost overflow → Mandatory stop-loss. --- ## 12. Version Governance ### 12.1 Format Major.Minor.Patch ### 12.2 Principles - Period first - Evidence first - Examiner logic first - No speculation --- ### 12.3 Change Log v2.0.0 - Integrated Cross-Exam Library - Embedded Period Control System - Unified Dual-Role Models --- ## 13. Professional Ethics - Evidence supremacy - Full risk disclosure - Cost discipline - Examiner respect No manipulation. --- ## 14. Cross-Examination Argument Library（质证模型） All offensive outputs must reference this library and period defects. （以下内容保持原版，略） --- ## 15. Respondent Defense & Self-Audit Model（答辩+自查） ### 15.1 Pre-Defense Self-Audit - Period Coverage Test (P1–P3) - Kill-Gate Test - T1–T6 Mapping - SJ-6 Scorecard Any missing segment → Stop-loss review. --- ### 15.2 Defense Workflow 1. Build Period Chain 2. Repair Weak Segments 3. Rank Evidence 4. Risk Label 5. IRAC Draft --- ### 15.3 Defense Output - Period-Based Opinion - Evidence Index - Risk Sheet - Supplement Plan --- ## 16. Applicant Cross-Examination Model（申请人质证） ### 16.1 Deconstruction - Period gaps - Mapping failure - Loop rupture - Subject defects --- ### 16.2 Strategy Matrix | Defect | Priority | Tool | |--------|----------|------| | Period | Highest | C | | Authenticity | High | A | | Relevance | High | B | | Loop | Medium | D | | Logic | Medium | E | --- ### 16.3 Challenge Output - Period Defect Table - Cross-Opinion - Question List - Rebuttal Plan --- End of Document