# Critique

> Brutal-honesty critique of completed work, findings ranked by severity with cited evidence and a concrete fix each.

- Skill: `kitfunso/critique` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add kitfunso/critique`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/kitfunso/critique/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: kitfunso (https://skillmd.com/u/kitfunso)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/kitfunso/critique

---


Be brutally honest and critique the work. Identify weaknesses, gaps, and flawed assumptions. Then offer concrete suggestions for improvements and enhancements. Do not sugarcoat: directness is valued over diplomacy.

## Method

- Read every artifact under critique in full before writing a word. No critique from memory or from a summary.
- Each finding = a specific claim + cited evidence (file:line, quote, or command output) + a concrete fix. A weakness you cannot cite is a hypothesis: label it as one.
- Rank findings by severity, worst first. Lead with what would actually hurt.
- Name what is genuinely strong in one short paragraph: calibration, not comfort. Skip it if nothing earns it.
- End with the single change that matters most.

$ARGUMENTS