# Code Review

> Review Langfuse code changes for correctness, regressions, and best practices.

- Skill: `langfuse/code-review` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add langfuse/code-review`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/langfuse/code-review/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: langfuse (https://skillmd.com/u/langfuse)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/langfuse/code-review

---


# Code Review

Use this skill when the task is to review code changes rather than implement a
feature.

## Start Here

- Read [`references/review-checklist.md`](references/review-checklist.md) for
  the repo's canonical review rules.
- Read root [`AGENTS.md`](../../../AGENTS.md) and the nearest package
  `AGENTS.md` for the files under review.
- If the review touches ClickHouse, also use the shared
  `clickhouse-best-practices` skill.
- If the review touches backend code, also use the shared
  `backend-dev-guidelines` skill where relevant.
- If the change accepts a user-supplied URL, adds outbound HTTP, introduces a
  new integration, touches secrets, RBAC, redirect handling, product
  analytics, browser monitoring, or session replay, also use the shared
  [`security-review`](../security-review/SKILL.md) skill. Run its
  [`references/checklist.md`](../security-review/references/checklist.md)
  before signoff.

## Review Priorities

Focus on:

- correctness bugs
- behavioral regressions
- security and tenant-isolation risks
- performance issues with real impact
- missing or weak tests for risky changes
- Before calling coverage missing, identify the unique regression each proposed
  test catches. Do not ask for one whose only assertion would restate the diff —
  a spacing value, a label — because it costs a file and proves nothing. Prefer merging into the closest existing suite. Flag repeated
  tests of the same predicate across layers unless each proves a distinct
  transport, projection, or execution boundary.

## Output Expectations

- Findings first, ordered by severity
- File and line references for each finding
- Short summary only after findings
- If no findings, say so explicitly and mention any residual risk or coverage gaps

## Scope Guidance

Use `references/review-checklist.md` for Langfuse-specific checks such as:

- ClickHouse and Postgres migration expectations
- project-scoped tenant isolation checks
- API/Fern consistency
- banner-offset UI positioning
- environment variable access patterns

Do not duplicate those rules in ad hoc prompts or tool-specific command files.

