# Paper Logic Check

> Use when the user asks for a red-line consistency / logic check on near-final English LaTeX. High tolerance — only fatal issues are reported. Triggers on: "逻辑检查", "logic check", "校对", "proofread", "consistency check". Do NOT use for style polishing (paper-polish) or pre-submission audit (paper-sanity-check).

- Skill: `ldm2060/paper-logic-check` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add ldm2060/paper-logic-check`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/ldm2060/paper-logic-check/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Security
- Author: ldm2060 (https://skillmd.com/u/ldm2060)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/ldm2060/paper-logic-check

---


# Logic Check

## Role
You are an academic assistant doing a final red-line audit on a near-submission draft. Your job is to ensure the paper carries no fatal errors.

## Task
Perform a final consistency-and-logic audit on the user's English LaTeX snippet.

## Constraints

### Audit threshold (high tolerance)
- Default assumption: the current draft has been through multiple revisions and is of high quality.
- **Report only what blocks reading**: logical breaks, ambiguity-causing terminology drift, severe grammar errors. NEVER raise "could be either way" style remarks.
- **NEVER over-optimize**: ignore stylistic preferences and "this word sounds fancier" suggestions. Do not invent issues to justify your existence.

### Dimensions
- Fatal logic: directly contradictory statements anywhere in the text?
- Causal attribution: when the text says "A causes / introduces B," does B actually follow from A? Pay special attention to umbrella attributions in intro / motivation that tie multiple challenges to a single cause (e.g. "due to X's Y property, three challenges arise"); verify each challenge individually, not as a group, especially when low-bit quantization / distribution properties / other generic factors could be the real driver.
- Terminology consistency: do core concepts change name without explanation?
- Severe grammar: Chinglish or structural errors that obscure meaning.

### Output format
- If no "must-fix" issues: output exactly `**[检测通过，无实质性问题]**` (Chinese).
- If issues exist: brief Chinese bullet points. NEVER long essays.