# Due Diligence Summary

> Produces structured U.S. transactional due diligence summaries with risk ratings, document citations, and follow-up actions. Triggers when the user requests a due diligence summary, diligence report, red-flag memo, or data room analysis for M&A, investment, or partnership transactions.

- Skill: `lev-os/due-diligence-summary` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add lev-os/due-diligence-summary`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/lev-os/due-diligence-summary/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Docs & Writing
- Author: lev-os (https://skillmd.com/u/lev-os)
- Updated: 2026-09-10
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/lev-os/due-diligence-summary

---


# Due Diligence Summary

Decision-ready diligence summary with risk ratings, evidence citations, and next-step actions for U.S. transactional matters.

## Quick Start

Gather before beginning:

1. **Transaction snapshot** — type, parties, structure, timeline, target entities
2. **Scope definition** — in/out-of-scope categories, materiality threshold, jurisdictions
3. **Data room index** — document list with stable IDs and dates
4. **Substantive materials** — governance docs, financials, contracts, IP schedules, litigation files, HR/benefits, real estate, tax, environmental records
5. **Privilege/confidentiality designation** and allowed audience

## Workflow

1. **Map scope to inventory** — mark each category Complete / Partial / Missing using the coverage checklist.
2. **Extract findings** — facts, obligations, restrictions, change-of-control and consent triggers.
3. **Classify** each finding as Fact, Representation, or Open Issue.
4. **Rate risk and materiality** — quantify exposure where possible.
5. **Flag conflicts** across sources; resolve by authority and date.
6. **Produce summary** using the deliverable template; cite every material finding as `[Doc ID or Title, date, page/section]`.

### Risk Scale

| Rating | Meaning | Action |
|--------|---------|--------|
| High | Likely deal impact or material exposure | Escalate; require resolution/mitigation |
| Medium | Manageable; needs diligence or contractual protection | Track; address in docs/price |
| Low | Informational or minor exposure | Note; monitor if cumulative |

### Coverage Checklist

| Category | Expected Core Docs |
|----------|--------------------|
| Corporate/Governance | Charter, bylaws, consents, cap table, subsidiary org |
| Financials/Debt | Audited/unaudited FS, debt docs, guarantees, liens |
| Contracts | Top customer/vendor, assignment/consent, exclusivity |
| IP/Tech | IP schedule, licenses, OSS use, assignments |
| Litigation/Reg | Docket list, claims history, agency letters |
| HR/Benefits | Payroll, key employee agreements, benefits plans |
| Real Estate/Assets | Leases, deeds, asset schedules |
| Tax | Returns, audits, NOLs, nexus |
| Environmental | Phase I/II, permits, compliance |

## Deliverable Template

### Executive Summary
- Deal snapshot (type, parties, target, valuation if known)
- Top 5 red flags with risk rating and cited evidence
- Missing critical items

### Scope & Coverage
- In-scope categories and jurisdictions
- Coverage checklist with gaps and rationale

### Key Findings by Category

One table per category (Corporate/Governance, Financials/Debt, Contracts, IP/Tech, Litigation/Regulatory, HR/Benefits, Real Estate/Assets, Tax, Environmental):

| Issue | Evidence | Risk | Materiality | Follow-up |
|-------|----------|------|-------------|-----------|

### Conflicts & Discrepancies

| Topic | Conflicting Sources | Assessment | Action |
|-------|---------------------|------------|--------|

### Open Items / Follow-Up Requests

| Item | Rationale | Requested From | Priority |
|------|-----------|----------------|----------|

### Recommended Actions
- Contractual protections (rep, warranty, indemnity, covenants)
- Price or structure adjustments
- Pre-closing conditions or consents

## Pitfalls & Checks

- Separate confirmed facts from representations and open issues — never conflate.
- Flag missing expected documents as findings with risk and impact.
- Use exact dates, parties, dollar amounts, and governing law when available.
- Label unsigned drafts as non-authoritative.
- For regulated industries, add a compliance subsection (HIPAA, FDA, FINRA/SEC, OFAC, FCPA, state licensing); mark statutes `[VERIFY]` if uncertain.
- Stay neutral and evidence-driven — do not advocate for or against the deal.
- Preserve privilege and confidentiality; limit distribution as instructed.