# Practice Cycle

> Move a non-trivial task through practice, observation, reflection, and the next smallest test without forcing a generic plan or feedback artifact. Use when a phase ends, an implementation or investigation must inform its next move, a prior attempt failed or produced ambiguous evidence, work is being resumed, or the user asks to turn results into the next bounded action. Do not use as a mandatory preflight for routine one-step work or when a more specific methodology already owns the live judgment.

- Skill: `lidessen/practice-cycle-2` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add lidessen/practice-cycle-2`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/lidessen/practice-cycle-2/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Productivity
- Author: lidessen (https://skillmd.com/u/lidessen)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/lidessen/practice-cycle-2

---


# Practice Cycle

## Principle expression

**Primary:** P03
**Supporting:** P02, P08, P15

## Scope

Own one judgment: **given the actual result of a practice, what is the next
smallest practice that can revise or settle the current understanding?**

This is the task-level replacement for a generic convergence loop. It inherits
the everyday evidence, restraint, and verification discipline expressed by
`disciplined-development`, but adds a conditional learning handoff between one
practice and the next. It is not a mandatory preflight, project planner, form
selector, task board, or acceptance authority.

## Principle source

Use a host Sequence and its matching interpretations when the host declares
them. Otherwise use this skill's read-only fallback in `references/sequence.md`.
Read only P03, P02, P08, and P15 for this
skill's stable lineage. A live task may select a different current lead, but it
does not create co-primary doctrine.

## Start

Begin from the live practice rather than a named workflow:

```text
Actual site and observed result:
Current contradiction and hard constraints:
What remains inference or uncertainty:
Smallest next practice:
Observation that would revise the current judgment:
What, if anything, a later actor must recover:
```

If the work is genuinely one-step and no result needs to revise a later
judgment, do the work under normal disciplined development. Do not create a
cycle, plan, or feedback artifact.

### Principal intervention

When a Principal message changes the active target, hard boundary, concept
relation, authority, or acceptance condition, treat the former reading as
invalid before another mutation. State the rejected assumption, new invariant,
affected surfaces, and smallest disconfirming next probe. When an installed
runtime binding offers a reconciliation receipt, record those same fields there;
the binding is optional evidence and never changes this skill's judgment or
human authority. Do not create a receipt for an ordinary execute, continue, or
formatting request that leaves the active decision unchanged.

## Core method

1. **Orient in the actual object.** Read the current state, prior result, and
   governing constraints. Separate observation from interpretation. A past plan
   is evidence of intent, not proof of present reality.
2. **Name the live contradiction.** State what prevents the next valid action.
   If a domain methodology owns that contradiction, route there; do not wrap it
   in a generic cycle.
3. **Choose one smallest practice.** Select the least irreversible intervention,
   probe, implementation slice, or review that can change the current
   understanding while retaining hard constraints. Do not write a full plan
   merely because future work exists.
4. **Act and observe.** Let the selected owner execute: a local change,
   specialized skill, Work Cell, human review, or external operation. The cycle
   does not seize execution or acceptance authority.
5. **Reflect against a disconfirming observation.** Record what happened, what
   it changes, and what remains uncertain. A successful-looking action that
   cannot change a later decision is not sufficient learning.
6. **Choose disposition.**
   - **settle:** the acceptance condition is met; state evidence and residual risk;
   - **continue:** name the next smallest practice from the revised state;
   - **route:** a form contradiction goes to `form-guidance`; a reusable
     principle question goes to `principle-cultivation`; a domain contradiction
     goes to its owning methodology.
7. **Externalize only decision-changing learning.** Leave a durable record only
   when handoff, approval, or a later decision would otherwise repeat or
   contradict the learning. The record is evidence, not a permanent workflow.

## Boundaries

- `disciplined-development` remains the lighter behavioral baseline. Use this
  Skill only when an observed result must alter a later practice.
- Do not invent a design, strategic plan, or task hierarchy. If such a domain
  method is needed, identify the unresolved domain question and route it.
- Do not decide whether a new Skill, runtime, artifact, or projection should
  exist; that is the low-frequency `form-guidance` judgment.
- Do not let the actor that performed a durable change accept it without the
  designated verifier or human authority.
- Do not treat repeated motion as learning. P08 requires an observation capable
  of revising the current judgment.

## Completion standard

The cycle is complete when the actual result, revised judgment, next disposition,
and any decision-changing inheritance are explicit. It is supported only when
an action probe shows a result changing the next step, a boundary probe rejects
one-step work or a domain-owned task, and a context probe shows the method did
not force irrelevant planning material into the task.