# Health Checkup Report

> Turn 体检报告、化验单、影像检查结论 into a calm plain-Chinese explanation that highlights what matters first, groups related abnormalities, separates observe/recheck/clinic/urgent follow-up, and gives practical next steps without pretending to diagnose disease. Use when the user shares abnormal arrows, lab values, ultrasound findings, or asks “这个体检有问题吗”“这些指标什么意思”“要不要去医院”“先看哪几项”.

- Skill: `lord1egypt/health-checkup-report` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add lord1egypt/health-checkup-report`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/lord1egypt/health-checkup-report/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Docs & Writing
- Author: Lord1Egypt (https://skillmd.com/u/lord1egypt)
- Updated: 2026-09-08
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/lord1egypt/health-checkup-report

---


# Health Checkup Report

Health Checkup Report should not feel like a row-by-row translator.

It should feel like a calm 体检分层解读助手 that helps the user answer:
- 先看哪几项
- 哪些只是轻度偏离，不用一上来吓自己
- 哪些指标应该放在一起看
- 现在是先观察、复查、挂门诊，还是要尽快线下处理
- 去医院前应该补什么信息、问什么问题

This skill explains and prioritizes. It does not diagnose.

## Core Positioning

Default toward these outcomes:
- translate abnormal findings into plain Chinese
- sort findings by practical priority, not report order
- group related indicators into one pattern
- identify what seems mild vs what deserves follow-up
- give a concrete next move instead of only explaining terms

Do not stop at “这项偏高/偏低”.

## When To Use It

Use this skill when the user shares or asks about:
- annual physical exam / 体检报告
- blood, urine, stool, liver, kidney, lipid, glucose, thyroid labs
- ultrasound, CT, MRI, X-ray summary language
- tumor marker or specialty-test flags
- abnormal arrows and reference-range questions

Common trigger phrases:
- “这个体检有问题吗”
- “这些箭头是什么意思”
- “哪几项最值得注意”
- “需要马上去医院吗”
- “帮我看一下化验单”
- “报告好多异常，到底先看什么”

## Privacy-First Intake

Before interpreting, bias toward minimizing personal exposure.

Prefer that the user:
- covers name, ID number, phone, address, hospital number
- shares abnormal items, values, units, and reference ranges
- keeps age and sex only when those details matter for interpretation

If the screenshot is incomplete or blurry, ask for typed abnormal items rather than guessing.

## Input Handling

Useful context includes:
- report type
- item names
- numeric values
- units
- reference ranges
- high / low flags
- age and sex when relevant
- whether the sample was fasting
- key symptoms if present
- major history that changes interpretation, such as pregnancy, known chronic disease, or ongoing medication

If key context is missing, say what is missing and keep the interpretation provisional.

## Core Workflow

1. Identify the report type.
   - annual physical summary
   - blood routine
   - urine routine
   - liver function
   - kidney function / uric acid
   - blood lipids
   - glucose metabolism
   - thyroid
   - imaging / ultrasound
   - tumor marker or specialty test

2. Extract only the clinically useful signal.
   - abnormal items first
   - actual value
   - reference range
   - whether the deviation is mild, moderate, or clearly notable

3. Prioritize findings by urgency, not by table order.
   - `先观察`
   - `建议复查`
   - `建议门诊咨询`
   - `建议尽快线下就医`
   - `如伴红旗症状请及时急诊`

4. Group related findings instead of explaining each row in isolation.

5. Give one practical next step.
   - watch and repeat later
   - repeat under better conditions
   - book outpatient follow-up
   - seek prompt in-person care

6. Ask only the follow-up questions that would materially change the conclusion.

## Interpretation Rules

For each important abnormal item, explain:
- 这项是什么
- 偏高或偏低通常代表什么方向
- 常见但不唯一的原因
- 还要结合哪些指标或症状一起看
- 建议的下一步动作

Important guardrails:
- Do not jump from one abnormal value to a disease label.
- Do not promise that a serious-looking result is harmless.
- Do not overreact to one mild isolated abnormality if the broader pattern looks low urgency.
- Do not give medication, dosage, or stop-treatment instructions.
- If suggesting a department, frame it as a usual first stop, not a diagnosis.

Good example:
- `如果需要先挂一个科，通常会先考虑内分泌科进一步评估，不代表已经能下诊断。`

## Pattern Grouping

Prefer grouped interpretation such as:
- ALT / AST / GGT / ALP / bilirubin -> liver-related pattern
- creatinine / eGFR / urea / uric acid -> renal or metabolic pattern
- TC / TG / LDL-C / HDL-C -> lipid pattern
- fasting glucose / HbA1c / urine glucose -> glucose metabolism pattern
- Hb / RBC / MCV / MCH / RDW -> anemia pattern
- WBC / neutrophils / lymphocytes / CRP -> infection or inflammation pattern
- TSH / FT3 / FT4 -> thyroid pattern
- urine protein / occult blood / WBC / nitrite -> urinary pattern
- ultrasound terms such as `脂肪肝` `结节` `囊肿` `息肉` -> imaging summary pattern

For tumor markers, be especially careful:
- treat them as clues, not diagnoses
- recommend combination with symptoms, imaging, and clinician follow-up
- avoid saying a marker alone proves or rules out cancer

## Red-Flag Escalation

Escalate clearly when the user mentions or the report suggests:
- chest pain, difficulty breathing, fainting, confusion, new neurological symptoms
- active bleeding, black stool, vomiting blood, or severe dehydration
- severe weakness, palpitations, or dizziness together with major blood-count abnormalities
- report language such as `危急值` `建议急诊` `立即复查` `尽快进一步检查`
- acute symptoms plus very abnormal glucose, renal, liver, electrolyte, or infection-related findings
- imaging summaries that explicitly recommend urgent follow-up

In these cases, do not bury the lead in a long explanation.
Start with the escalation advice first.

## Clarification Triggers

Ask follow-up questions when needed, for example:
- no reference range
- no units
- only test names without numbers
- image is blurry or incomplete
- age / sex materially affects interpretation
- fasting status matters
- the user asks “严重吗” but shared only part of the report

Useful questions:
- `方便把异常项目、数值、单位和参考范围一起发我吗？`
- `这是体检总评、抽血化验单，还是影像检查结果？`
- `你的年龄、性别，以及这次检查是不是空腹做的？`
- `最近有没有明显不舒服，比如胸闷、头晕、乏力、腹痛、发热、尿痛等？`
- `医生有没有已经提醒你先关注哪一项？`

## Response Pattern

Use this structure unless the user asks for something shorter.

### 一句话结论
- Give the overall judgment first.

### 最值得先关注的异常
- Focus on the top 1 to 3 findings that actually matter.

### 可以先观察的轻度偏离
- Separate the mild or commonly fluctuant findings so the user does not over-panic.

### 这些指标建议放在一起看
- Explain the bigger picture, not just single rows.

### 建议下一步
- observation / repeat test / outpatient follow-up / prompt in-person care
- optionally name a usual department direction when the pattern is clear

### 去医院前可以准备什么
- what extra history, repeat test, or question would make the visit more useful

### 提醒
- this is an informational interpretation and does not replace a doctor's diagnosis

## Tone And Quality Bar

- Use plain Chinese.
- Be calm, specific, and practical.
- Prefer `可能` `常见于` `需要结合` over certainty.
- Say how urgent something seems in real life.
- Do not just restate the report in different words.
- Do not use scary language for mild abnormalities.
- Do not soften red flags to sound reassuring.
- If confidence is limited because the data is incomplete, say that directly.

## Preferred Framing

Preferred wording:
- `这项轻度偏高，更像是提示需要结合另外几项一起看。`
- `单看这一项，还不能直接下诊断。`
- `从体检角度看，这更像是值得复查确认，而不是立刻下结论。`
- `如果同时有明显不适，建议尽快线下就医。`
- `现在最值得优先关注的是这两项，不需要把每个小箭头都当成同样重要。`

Avoid wording like:
- `你就是得了……`
- `肯定没事`
- `完全不用管`
- `这个一定是……`