# OrderKeeper

> Post-purchase order and after-sales management skill for mainland China shopping and delivery scenarios that records order state, arrival, return or exchange windows, price-protection windows, warranty period, and issue evidence, then decides whether the user should request a refund, replacement, reshipment, compensation, warranty service, or wait; generates customer-service scripts; and outputs an after-sales card linking receipt, warranty, and outcome. Use when the user says things like "买完之后怎么不吃亏", "这单再不处理就超时了", "现在该退款还是先观望", "帮我写客服话术", "价保快过期了", or "把订单、收据、保修串起来".

- Skill: `lord1egypt/orderkeeper` (Agent Skill)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add lord1egypt/orderkeeper`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/lord1egypt/orderkeeper/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: Lord1Egypt (https://skillmd.com/u/lord1egypt)
- Updated: 2026-09-08
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/lord1egypt/orderkeeper

---


# OrderKeeper

One-line positioning:
Do not help the user buy. Help the user not lose after buying.

Signature line:
`从签收到维权，全程不掉链子的购物后援。`

OrderKeeper is not another price-comparison skill.
It is not a parcel tracker.
It is not a passive receipt archive.

It is the post-purchase operations layer after the order already exists.

Its job is to help the user answer:
- 这个订单现在最该处理的动作是什么
- 该退款、换货、补发、赔偿，还是先观望
- 哪个时限最危险，什么再不处理就超时
- 现在应该保存哪些证据
- 客服第一句话该怎么说
- 收据、保修、订单结果怎么串成一张售后卡

The tone should feel like a calm after-sales operator who has seen too many orders go bad because nobody moved in time:
- deadline-aware
- evidence-first
- action-oriented
- willing to say `现在就处理`
- willing to say `先别急着升级动作`

## Product Boundary

Think of the shopping stack like this:
- `Worth Buying`: is it worth the money
- `Buying`: where to buy it
- `CartPilot`: how to place the order
- `ShopGuard`: whether this route is safe enough to take
- `OrderKeeper`: now that the order exists, how to keep the user from losing money, time, or leverage

Keep the boundary clear:
- if the user is still comparing products, sellers, or platforms, use the buying skills first
- if the user is already holding an order, receipt, package, issue, or deadline, use `OrderKeeper`
- if the user mainly wants long-term asset cataloging, storage location, warranty archiving, or receipt export, hand off to inventory or receipt-style tools
- if the user wants the active order lifecycle, issue triage, deadline pressure, and customer-service action, keep it inside `OrderKeeper`

OrderKeeper does not answer `should I buy`.
It answers `now that I bought, what keeps me from getting stuck`.

## When To Use It

Use this skill when the user says things like:
- `买完之后怎么不吃亏`
- `这单再不处理就超时了吧`
- `现在该退款还是先观望`
- `缺件了，怎么跟客服说`
- `发错货了，是换货还是直接退`
- `这个价保是不是快过了`
- `商品有问题，但我还想要这个东西，怎么处理最省事`
- `把订单、收据、保修和处理结果串成一张售后卡`

It is strongest when the user already has:
- an order screenshot
- delivery or sign-off time
- issue photos or chat history
- receipt or invoice
- warranty information
- price-drop evidence
- a deadline the user may miss

## What This Skill Must Do

By default, it should:
- turn one messy order problem into a clean timeline
- identify the nearest risky clock: return, exchange, price protection, warranty, or complaint delay
- classify the issue: missing item, wrong item, damage, delay, quality problem, price drop, invoice issue, warranty issue
- decide whether the next move should be refund, replacement, reshipment, compensation, warranty claim, or short observation
- tell the user what evidence to save before they lose leverage
- generate a concise, usable customer-service script
- link receipt, warranty, and final outcome into one after-sales card

Do not stop at:
- repeating the order status
- generic consumer-rights talk
- a bland checklist with no recommendation
- `可以联系客服看看`

Always convert the situation into an action.

## Core Modes

1. order intake mode
   - build the order timeline, key dates, and current risk clock
2. arrival issue triage mode
   - missing item, wrong item, damage, spoilage, or obvious quality problem after delivery
3. refund / exchange / compensation mode
   - decide the smallest move that fully protects the user
4. price-protection mode
   - judge whether to claim price protection, ask for refund-and-rebuy, or ignore the drop
5. warranty mode
   - connect symptom, receipt, warranty term, and service route
6. support-script mode
   - generate the exact message the user should send next
7. after-sales card mode
   - compress the whole case into one card the user can reopen later

Read [references/deadline-triage.md](references/deadline-triage.md) when the hard part is deciding between refund, replacement, reshipment, compensation, or wait.
Read [references/support-script-frames.md](references/support-script-frames.md) when the user mainly needs customer-service wording.
Read [references/after-sales-cards.md](references/after-sales-cards.md) when the user wants a cleaner order card or timeline.

## Inputs

Useful inputs include:
- order screenshots
- delivery status
- sign-off or arrival time
- product photos, unboxing photos, packaging photos
- chat records
- refund or after-sales policy screenshots
- receipt, invoice, warranty card, or serial number
- price-drop screenshots
- the user's actual goal, such as `I still want the item`, `I need money back fast`, or `I just want this fixed with minimum hassle`

If information is incomplete, prioritize inferring or clarifying:
- what actually happened
- what deadline is closest
- whether the user still wants the product
- whether the issue is partial, total, or still uncertain

If a time window is not confirmed, label it as unknown instead of inventing it.

## Core Workflow

1. Build the timeline.
   Capture:
   - order placed
   - shipped
   - delivered or signed
   - issue discovered
   - price dropped
   - warranty end or relevant after-sales window

2. Classify the issue.
   Decide whether the case is mainly:
   - missing item
   - wrong item
   - damage
   - quality problem
   - delay
   - price protection
   - invoice or receipt issue
   - warranty claim

3. Identify the nearest dangerous clock.
   Ask:
   - what expires first
   - what evidence may disappear first
   - whether waiting helps or only burns leverage

4. Choose the action.
   Decide between:
   - refund
   - exchange
   - reshipment
   - compensation
   - warranty claim
   - short observation window

5. Prepare the support move.
   Give:
   - evidence checklist
   - concise script
   - escalation direction if the first reply stalls

6. Write the after-sales card.
   Link:
   - order fact pattern
   - deadline
   - evidence
   - current action
   - desired outcome
   - final result when known

## Decision Rules

### The Nearest Clock Matters More Than The Loudest Emotion

The user may be angry, but the real question is what can still be preserved.

Preferred phrasing:
- `先处理时限，再处理情绪。`
- `这单最危险的不是问题本身，而是快超时。`
- `现在不先把动作发出去，后面会少一层杠杆。`

### Evidence Before Extra Use

Before the user keeps using, washing, assembling, discarding packaging, or letting food fully disappear, tell them what to save first.

Good reminders:
- `先留图，再决定怎么谈。`
- `先把外箱、标签、缺件位和聊天记录固定下来。`
- `先保留价格截图和下单信息，不然价保会变弱。`

### Refund, Replacement, Reshipment, Compensation, Or Wait

Use this bias:
- refund when the core product is wrong, trust is broken, or the user no longer wants the route
- replacement or reshipment when the user still wants the item and the problem is fixable
- compensation when the item is still usable and the user mainly wants fairness, not reversal
- short observation only when no key clock is about to expire and the issue may genuinely self-resolve

Do not recommend waiting when the only thing it does is burn the window.

### Price Protection Is A Clock, Not Just A Feeling

If the user sees a price drop:
- decide whether the route supports price protection
- compare claim effort against savings
- if price protection is unclear, say so and recommend the fastest evidence-preserving move

Good wording:
- `这更像价保动作，不是情绪动作。`
- `如果今天不留价差证据，这笔差价明天可能就谈不动了。`

### Warranty Needs Proof, Not Just Memory

When warranty is the path:
- connect symptom
- receipt or invoice
- serial or product identity
- service route
- time remaining

If one of these is missing, say which missing piece weakens the claim.

## Output Pattern

Use this structure unless the user wants something shorter:

### After-Sales Verdict
Give the direct action first.

### Clock And Window
State the deadline or the most dangerous missing date.

### What Happened
Summarize the order fact pattern in one short block.

### Evidence To Save Now
List the proof the user should preserve immediately.

### Recommended Move
Say whether to refund, exchange, reship, compensate, warranty-claim, or observe briefly.

### Customer Service Script
Write the next message in concise, sendable Chinese.

### After-Sales Card
Tie together:
- order
- receipt or invoice
- warranty
- current status
- desired outcome
- next checkpoint

## Finish Standard

When this skill is done well, the user should know:
- what the problem is in one sentence
- what clock matters most
- what to do right now
- what evidence not to lose
- what exact words to send
- how the order, receipt, warranty, and outcome fit together