# Nsfc Health Grant Transfer

> Extract and apply the writing logic, section workflow, and rhetorical style of an NSFC Youth Fund-style Chinese health, nursing, public health, psychology, rehabilitation, or clinical research proposal. Use when drafting, revising, or migrating project notes into National Natural Science Foundation of China proposal sections such as 摘要, 立项依据, 国内外研究现状, 研究思路, 研究内容, 研究目标, 关键科学问题, 研究方案, 技术路线, 可行性分析, 特色与创新, 年度计划, 研究基础, 工作条件, 预算说明, or when the user asks for 国自然/NSFC/青年基金/申报书风格迁移/内容迁移/写作思路.

- Skill: `lyh-233/nsfc-health-grant-transfer` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 3 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add lyh-233/nsfc-health-grant-transfer`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/lyh-233/nsfc-health-grant-transfer/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Research & Search
- Author: lyh-233 (https://skillmd.com/u/lyh-233)
- Updated: 2026-09-22
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/lyh-233/nsfc-health-grant-transfer

---


# NSFC Health Grant Transfer

## Core Use

Use this skill to transform a user's topic, notes, prior grant text, manuscript, or raw research plan into the style and content logic of a Chinese NSFC health-science proposal. Preserve the user's scientific facts; migrate only structure, argument flow, phrasing habits, and section-level emphasis.

Load `references/source-writing-patterns.md` when you need the detailed section templates, argument chain, or phrase bank.

## Workflow

1. Identify the project spine:
   `target population/problem -> core theoretical construct or mechanism -> critical stage/context -> method chain -> expected model/tool/intervention -> clinical/public-health value`.

2. Build the proposal logic before drafting:
   - Start from real-world and disciplinary urgency.
   - Narrow to a specific unaddressed mechanism or stage.
   - State why current studies are insufficient.
   - Convert the gap into research questions, objectives, and a staged method design.
   - End with an operable model, pathway, tool, strategy, or intervention that can be validated.

3. Map content into the NSFC body:
   - 摘要: one-paragraph compressed storyline.
   - 立项依据: significance, research status, gap, and research思路.
   - 研究内容/目标/关键科学问题: keep content, objectives, and questions tightly aligned.
   - 研究方案: expand each research content item into design, participants/data, tools, analysis, and output.
   - 技术路线/关键技术: show the staged dependency between studies.
   - 可行性/研究基础: convert prior work into evidence that the team can execute the plan.
   - 创新点: write as three dimensions: viewpoint, method, and perspective/application.
   - 年度计划/预期成果: align each year with one stage and measurable outputs.

4. Draft in grant voice:
   - Use compact, formal Chinese with clear causal transitions.
   - Prefer verbs such as `聚焦`, `拟以`, `构建`, `验证`, `阐明`, `揭示`, `形成`, `为...提供依据`.
   - Keep paragraphs problem-driven rather than descriptive.
   - Avoid copying names, project IDs, or source-specific details from the training proposal unless the user explicitly provides them for reuse.

5. Run a consistency pass:
   - Each research content item must map to at least one objective, method subsection, expected result, and innovation/feasibility support.
   - The key scientific questions must be answerable by the proposed methods.
   - The proposal should move from mechanism discovery to model construction or intervention validation when applicable.

## Output Modes

When the user asks for "提取思路" or "流程", provide a structured writing blueprint.

When the user provides new project material, produce a migrated outline first unless they ask directly for full prose.

When revising an existing proposal, diagnose missing links before rewriting: `gap不够尖锐`, `目标与内容不匹配`, `方法无法回答关键科学问题`, `创新点像总结而非创新`, or `研究基础未支撑可行性`.