# Editor Review Methodology

> Editorial review methodology — fact-checking, voice audit, engagement review, and source integrity assessment.

- Skill: `magnus919/editor-review-methodology` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 5 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add magnus919/editor-review-methodology`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/magnus919/editor-review-methodology/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Security
- License: MIT
- Author: magnus919 (https://skillmd.com/u/magnus919)
- Updated: 2026-09-17
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/magnus919/editor-review-methodology

---


# Editorial Review Methodology

Review dimensions for assessing whether a draft is ready for publication.

## Review Dimensions

| Dimension | Question | Reference |
|-----------|----------|-----------|
| **Fact-check** | Are all factual claims verifiable? | `references/fact-checking.md` |
| **Voice audit** | Is the tone consistent throughout? | `references/voice-audit.md` |
| **Engagement** | Does the piece earn the reader's attention? | `references/engagement-review.md` |
| **Source integrity** | Are sources properly attributed and verified? | `references/source-integrity.md` |

## Review Protocol

1. **Structural first, line-by-line last.** Don't proofread until the structure is solid.
2. **Flag and suggest — don't rewrite.** The editor identifies issues; the writer decides how to fix them.
3. **One dimension per pass.** Don't mix fact-checking with voice audit in the same reading.