# Design Methods for Wellbeing (TU Delft & Tongji)

> Apply systematic design methodologies from leading institutions for wellbeing-centered design. Use when structuring design processes, facilitating stakeholder engagement, creating emotional resonance, integrating values, or evaluating design decisions. Combines TU Delft's rigorous human-centered approaches with Tongji's emotional and experiential design.

- Skill: `majiayu000/design-methods-for-wellbeing-tu-delft-tongji` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds add majiayu000/design-methods-for-wellbeing-tu-delft-tongji`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/majiayu000/design-methods-for-wellbeing-tu-delft-tongji/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Product & Planning
- Author: majiayu000 (https://skillmd.com/u/majiayu000)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/majiayu000/design-methods-for-wellbeing-tu-delft-tongji

---


# Design Methods for Wellbeing: TU Delft & Tongji Approaches

Leading design institutions have developed complementary methodologies for wellbeing-centered design. TU Delft (Delft University of Technology, Netherlands) emphasizes value-driven, participatory, and ethics-focused design. Tongji University (Shanghai, China) contributes emotional design, experiential mapping, and cultural resonance. Together, they provide comprehensive, evidence-based design practice.

## TU Delft: Design for Values & Ethics

### Design for Values (DfV) Framework

**Core Principle**: Values (moral principles like autonomy, justice, care) should be explicitly embedded in design, not assumed or left to chance.

#### The DfV Process

1. **Value Identification**
   - Stakeholder workshops to surface moral values relevant to design
   - Distinguish values from interests (values are enduring principles; interests are situational preferences)
   - Map value pluralism (multiple legitimate values in tension)
   - Question: "What principles matter to you? What would be wrong with this design?"

2. **Value Operationalization**
   - Translate abstract values into concrete design criteria
   - Value → Functional Requirements → Design Specifications
   - Example: "Autonomy" → "Users can opt-out" → "Toggle for all tracking features"

3. **Value Realization**
   - Ensure design actually manifests values through implementation
   - Audit code, interfaces, policies for value alignment
   - Identify where values conflict and make intentional trade-offs

4. **Value Validation**
   - Test with stakeholders whether design reflects stated values
   - Gather feedback on unintended consequences
   - Refine based on lived experience

#### Wellbeing-Relevant Values in Design

| **Value** | **Design Implications** | **Questions to Ask** |
|-----------|----------------------|---------------------|
| **Autonomy** | User control, transparency, informed consent | Does the design manipulate or respect choice? Can users understand why features exist? |
| **Justice** | Fair access, equitable representation, non-discrimination | Who benefits? Who is burdened? Are impacts distributed fairly? |
| **Care** | Responsiveness to need, support for vulnerability | Does design respond to people's actual situations? Does it enable mutual care? |
| **Integrity** | Authenticity, alignment with values | Is the experience genuine or manufactured? Does it honor user identity? |
| **Flourishing** | Support for meaningful activity, skill development | Does this enable growth? Or dependency? |
| **Community** | Social connection, belonging, collective wellbeing | Does it strengthen or isolate? Individual or common good? |
| **Privacy** | Control over personal information, dignity | What data is collected? Who accesses it? Why? |

### Stakeholder Engagement & Participatory Design

**TU Delft Model of Participation**:

- **Inform**: Share information about design decisions
- **Consult**: Ask for input on options (bottom-up)
- **Collaborate**: Work together on problem-solving
- **Empower**: Transfer decision-making authority to stakeholders

**Implementation**:

1. **Stakeholder Mapping**
   - Identify all affected groups (users, caregivers, communities, regulators)
   - Distinguish power dynamics and interests
   - Plan engagement appropriate to each group

2. **Co-design Workshops**
   - Prepare design space with tools and materials
   - Facilitate group ideation without hierarchy
   - Document ideas visually and textually
   - Iterate on concepts with group feedback

3. **Democratic Experimentation**
   - Prototype multiple design directions
   - Stakeholders experience possibilities
   - Vote or consensus on preferred direction
   - Discuss reasons and concerns

4. **Ongoing Feedback Loops**
   - Don't end participation after workshops
   - Regular check-ins during implementation
   - Support for adaptive use and feedback

### Circular Design & Systems Thinking

**TU Delft Frame**: Design doesn't exist in isolation; it's embedded in social, environmental, and economic systems. Sustainable wellbeing design considers lifecycle impacts and circular flows.

**Questions**:
- What materials and resources does this design consume?
- What happens at end-of-life?
- Does design reinforce or challenge unsustainable patterns?
- Who bears environmental/social costs?
- How does design contribute to collective wellbeing?

## Tongji University: Emotional Design & Experience

### Emotional Design Theory

**Foundation**: Donald Norman's emotional design (visceral, behavioral, reflective levels) + cultural context

**Three Levels**:

1. **Visceral Design** (Aesthetic, Immediate)
   - Color, form, typography, sound
   - Evokes instant emotional response
   - Cultural specificity matters (colors, symbols)
   - Example: Warm colors for comfort vs. cool for calm

2. **Behavioral Design** (Function, Experience)
   - How well does it work?
   - Is it intuitive and responsive?
   - Does interaction flow feel natural?
   - Example: Smooth animations feel more pleasurable than jarring transitions

3. **Reflective Design** (Meaning, Identity)
   - Does it align with self-image and values?
   - Does it tell a meaningful story?
   - Does it enable identity expression?
   - Example: Customization features allow self-representation

### Experience Mapping & Emotional Journey

**Tongji Method**: Create rich, multi-sensory maps of user experience including emotional dimension

#### Experience Mapping Process

1. **Context Definition**
   - Specific user scenario or journey phase
   - Environmental factors (physical space, time, social context)
   - User state (stressed, curious, confident)

2. **Touchpoint Identification**
   - Every interaction point with system or product
   - Include pre-experience (anticipation) and post-experience (memory)
   - Formal (interface) and informal (word-of-mouth) touchpoints

3. **Emotional Resonance Mapping**
   - For each touchpoint: What emotion is likely?
   - What sensory elements contribute?
   - What meaning is conveyed?
   - Is emotional impact intentional?

4. **Cultural Translation**
   - Emotional resonance varies by culture
   - Test with representative users from target culture
   - Adapt visceral design (colors, symbols, music) appropriately
   - Consider values across cultural contexts

#### Emotional Journey Visualization

Create multi-layer maps showing:
- **Timeline**: Sequence of activities/touchpoints
- **Emotional Arc**: Plotted highs/lows of emotional valence
- **Sensory Experience**: What user sees, hears, feels, smells, tastes
- **Meaning**: Narrative significance and identity connection
- **Pain/Delight Points**: Where experience breaks down or shines

### Co-creation & Participatory Prototyping

**Tongji Focus**: Users aren't just informants; they're creative partners in defining meaningful experiences

#### Techniques

**1. Generative Sessions**
- Participants create collages, drawings, physical prototypes
- Non-designers can express tacit, embodied knowledge
- Conversation emerges from making, not interviews

**2. Role-play & Bodystorming**
- Act out desired future scenarios
- Use body and gesture to explore possibilities
- Reveals emotional and embodied dimensions

**3. Prototype Co-refinement**
- Bring rough prototypes; participants modify and iterate
- Build in public; refine with ongoing feedback
- Participants see their ideas realized

**4. Cultural Workshops**
- Explore cultural narratives and values
- Create emotionally resonant design within cultural context
- Avoid cultural appropriation; build authentic resonance

### Experiential Prototyping

**Goal**: Create full sensory experience of proposed design for evaluation and refinement

**Stages**:

1. **Spatial Prototyping**
   - Create physical mockups of user environment
   - Test how design feels in situ
   - Evaluate ergonomics, sensory qualities, social dynamics

2. **Temporal Prototyping**
   - Experience design over time, not snapshot
   - How does experience evolve? Does novelty wear off?
   - Does design support sustained wellbeing?

3. **Multimodal Prototyping**
   - Incorporate sound, haptics, scent, temperature
   - Not just visual/interaction design
   - Full sensory experience informs meaning-making

4. **Social Prototyping**
   - Test how design affects relationships and communities
   - Who feels included/excluded?
   - Does design foster belonging or isolation?

## Integration: TU Delft + Tongji Approach

### Unified Wellbeing Design Process

**Phase 1: Value & Experience Framing** (TU Delft + Tongji)
- Identify stakeholders and their values (TU Delft)
- Explore emotional dimensions and cultural narratives (Tongji)
- Co-define design brief with stakeholders
- Create aspirational vision for wellbeing outcomes

**Phase 2: Discovery & Empathy** (TU Delft + Tongji)
- Participatory stakeholder workshops (TU Delft)
- Ethnographic immersion in user contexts (TU Delft)
- Emotional journey mapping (Tongji)
- Generative co-creation sessions (Tongji)

**Phase 3: Ideation & Concept Development** (TU Delft + Tongji)
- Multi-directional ideation respecting value pluralism (TU Delft)
- Emotional resonance brainstorming (Tongji)
- Scenario development with cultural specificity (Tongji)
- Ethical trade-off analysis (TU Delft)

**Phase 4: Prototyping & Experience Design** (Tongji + TU Delft)
- Experiential prototyping for emotional qualities (Tongji)
- Value operationalization in design (TU Delft)
- Multimodal and temporal prototyping (Tongji)
- Stakeholder feedback loops (TU Delft)

**Phase 5: Evaluation & Refinement** (TU Delft + Tongji)
- Measure value realization through lived experience (TU Delft)
- Assess emotional resonance and cultural fit (Tongji)
- Qualitative research-through-design (Chapter 3)
- Psychometric validation of wellbeing outcomes (Chapter 2)

**Phase 6: Implementation & Adaptive Use** (TU Delft + Tongji)
- Co-implement with stakeholders (TU Delft)
- Support for emergent meanings and cultural adaptation (Tongji)
- Monitor for unintended consequences (TU Delft)
- Sustained engagement and relationship (Tongji)

## Practical Tools & Workshops

### Values Card Sort
**Tool**: Cards with values (autonomy, justice, care, etc.)
**Activity**:
1. Arrange cards by importance to you
2. Discuss tensions when values conflict
3. Prioritize for design
**Output**: Shared values framework

### Emotional Touchpoint Audit
**Activity**:
1. Create journey map of current experience
2. Rate emotional valence at each touchpoint (-5 to +5)
3. Identify where design could increase positive emotions
4. Note where comfort conflicts with growth

### Stakeholder Power Mapping
**Activity**:
1. List all stakeholders
2. Plot on axes: Power (to affect outcomes) vs. Interest (in outcomes)
3. Engage high-power, high-interest groups intensively
4. Ensure voice of vulnerable groups despite low power

### Values-to-Design Translation
**Process**:
- Value (e.g., Autonomy) →
- Design Principle (e.g., "User control over defaults") →
- Functional Requirement (e.g., "Settings allow turning off recommendations") →
- Implementation (e.g., Toggle in preferences, default OFF)

### Emotional Resonance Testing
**Method**:
1. Present design to representative users
2. Rate emotional response: visceral (visual), behavioral (usability), reflective (meaning)
3. Explain ratings: "What made it feel that way?"
4. Identify cultural/individual variations

## Wellbeing Design Principles Derived

### From TU Delft

1. **Design for Plural Values**: Acknowledge competing values; make trade-offs transparent
2. **Participatory Ethics**: Involve affected stakeholders in defining what's "good"
3. **Systemic Responsibility**: Consider lifecycle, externalities, collective impact
4. **Transparency by Design**: Help users understand decision-making and data use
5. **Democratic Governance**: Enable stakeholder input on design evolution

### From Tongji

1. **Emotional Authenticity**: Design for genuine feeling, not manufactured sentiment
2. **Cultural Resonance**: Honor local meanings and emotional associations
3. **Multisensory Experience**: Engage beyond visual/interaction; include sound, haptics, spatial
4. **Temporal Richness**: Design for sustained meaning-making, not just novelty
5. **Identity Expression**: Enable users to represent authentic selves

### Integrated Principles

1. **Wellbeing as Stakeholder Definition**: Not designer imposition—emerge through dialogue
2. **Values-Aligned Experience**: Make emotional design serve ethical principles
3. **Sustainable Flourishing**: Balance individual and collective wellbeing
4. **Adaptive Meaning-Making**: Support evolution of experience over time
5. **Equitable Participation**: Ensure powerful stakeholders don't dominate wellbeing definition

## Common Challenges in Integrated Design

| **Challenge** | **TU Delft Response** | **Tongji Response** |
|---------------|-------------------|-------------------|
| Values conflicts paralyze decisions | Make trade-offs explicit and transparent; stakeholder negotiation | Find emotional narratives that bridge values; cultural wisdom |
| Design feels sterile or overly rational | Include emotional/experiential design from start | Ground in emotional resonance; cultural meaning |
| Communities resist participation | Clarify stakes; build trust; ensure power-sharing | Create safe, culturally-appropriate spaces; value all knowledge |
| Emotional design feels manipulative | Tie emotions to values and transparency; ethical grounding | Use emotions to serve flourishing, not exploit vulnerabilities |
| Cultural adaptation flattens meaning | Engage local communities; avoid surface-level diversity | Deep co-creation; honor cultural expertise and wisdom |

## Resources & Further Learning

**TU Delft**:
- Design for Values methodology papers (van de Poel & others)
- Participatory design literature
- Circular economy and systems thinking resources

**Tongji University**:
- Emotional design and experience economy
- Cultural design and cross-cultural HCI
- Experiential prototyping methods

**Integration**:
- Sensemaking and meaning-making in design
- Participatory action research
- Community-based co-design case studies