# Generate QA Test Cases

> Generate QA test cases in Traditional Chinese from project code analysis.

- Skill: `majiayu000/generate-qa-test-cases` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add majiayu000/generate-qa-test-cases`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/majiayu000/generate-qa-test-cases/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: majiayu000 (https://skillmd.com/u/majiayu000)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/majiayu000/generate-qa-test-cases

---


# Generate QA Test Cases

Analyze project code and generate comprehensive test cases for QA testing.

**Important: Reports should be written in Traditional Chinese.**

## Arguments

- `$ARGUMENTS` - Target path to analyze (e.g., `libs/mxsecurity/account-page`)

## Analysis Process

### Step 1: Locate and Read Files

Read all relevant files from the target path:

- `**/*.ts` - TypeScript files (components, services, models)
- `**/*.html` - Template files
- `**/*.model.ts` - Data models
- `**/*.def.ts` - Constants and definitions
- `**/*.api.ts` - API service files

### Step 2: Extract Form Fields and Validation Rules

**From TypeScript files, extract:**

1. **Form Group Definitions**
   - `this.fb.group({...})` or `new FormGroup({...})`
   - `this.fb.nonNullable.group({...})`

2. **Form Controls with Validators**
   - `Validators.*` usage
   - `OneValidators.*` usage
   - Custom validators

3. **Conditional Validators**
   - `setValidators()` / `clearValidators()` calls
   - Dynamic validation logic

**Output Format:**

```markdown
## Form Fields and Validation Rules

### Form: {formName}

| Field Name | Type     | Required | Validators                                 | Conditions       |
| ---------- | -------- | -------- | ------------------------------------------ | ---------------- |
| username   | text     | Yes      | required, maxLength(32), pattern(alphanum) | Always           |
| password   | password | Yes      | required, minLength(8), complexity         | Create mode only |
```

### Step 3: Extract Error Messages

**From HTML templates, extract:**

1. **mat-error elements**
   - Error conditions (`*ngIf` / `@if`)
   - Translation keys for error messages

2. **Error message mappings**
   - `hasError('required')` → message
   - `hasError('minlength')` → message
   - Custom error keys

3. **oneUiFormError directive usage**
   - Auto-generated error messages

**Output Format:**

```markdown
## Validation Error Messages

### Field: {fieldName}

| Validation Rule | Error Condition         | Error Message (Translation Key)     |
| --------------- | ----------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
| required        | `hasError('required')`  | `COMMON.VALIDATION.REQUIRED`        |
| minLength(8)    | `hasError('minlength')` | `COMMON.VALIDATION.MIN_LENGTH`      |
| pattern         | `hasError('pattern')`   | `ACCOUNT.VALIDATION.INVALID_FORMAT` |
```

### Step 4: Extract Conditional Field Visibility

**From templates and components, extract:**

1. **Conditional rendering**
   - `@if (condition)` / `*ngIf="condition"`
   - `[hidden]="condition"`
   - `[disabled]="condition"`

2. **Mode-based visibility**
   - Create vs Edit mode differences
   - Role-based field visibility

3. **Dependent field logic**
   - Field A value affects Field B visibility
   - Cascading selections

**Output Format:**

```markdown
## Conditional Field Visibility

### Trigger: {triggerField} = {value}

| Affected Field  | Visibility | Enabled | Notes                            |
| --------------- | ---------- | ------- | -------------------------------- |
| passwordField   | Hidden     | -       | Only shown in create mode        |
| confirmPassword | Shown      | Enabled | Appears when password is entered |
```

### Step 5: Extract API Payload Format

**From API service files, extract:**

1. **POST/PUT endpoints**
   - Method signatures
   - Payload interfaces

2. **Request payload structure**
   - Required fields
   - Optional fields
   - Field types

3. **Data transformations**
   - Form data → API payload mapping

**Output Format:**

````markdown
## API Payload Format

### Endpoint: POST /auth/accountSet

#### Create Account (mode: 1)

```json
{
  "userName": "string (required)",
  "mode": 1,
  "userEnable": "number (0|1)",
  "authority": "number (1|2)",
  "new_pw": "string (required)",
  "confirm_pw": "string (required)"
}
```
````

#### Edit Account (mode: 2)

```json
{
  "userName": "string (required)",
  "mode": 2,
  "userEnable": "number (0|1)",
  "authority": "number (1|2)"
}
```

````

### Step 6: Generate Boundary Test Cases

Based on extracted validation rules, generate test cases:

1. **String Length Boundaries**
   - minLength: test with (min-1), min, (min+1)
   - maxLength: test with (max-1), max, (max+1)

2. **Numeric Range Boundaries**
   - min: test with (min-1), min, (min+1)
   - max: test with (max-1), max, (max+1)

3. **Pattern Validation**
   - Valid pattern examples
   - Invalid pattern examples
   - Edge cases (empty, special chars)

4. **Required Fields**
   - Empty string
   - Whitespace only
   - Null/undefined

**Output Format:**

```markdown
## Boundary Test Cases

### Field: username

| Test Case ID | Input Value | Expected Result | Validation Rule |
|--------------|-------------|-----------------|-----------------|
| TC-USER-001 | "" (empty) | Error: Required | required |
| TC-USER-002 | "   " (spaces) | Error: Required | required |
| TC-USER-003 | "a" (1 char) | Error: Min length | minLength(4) |
| TC-USER-004 | "abcd" (4 chars) | Valid | minLength(4) |
| TC-USER-005 | "a".repeat(32) | Valid | maxLength(32) |
| TC-USER-006 | "a".repeat(33) | Error: Max length | maxLength(32) |
| TC-USER-007 | "user@123" | Error: Invalid char | pattern(alphanum) |
| TC-USER-008 | "user_123" | Valid | pattern(alphanum) |
````

### Step 7: Generate Interaction Test Cases

Based on conditional visibility and mode logic:

1. **Mode Switching**
   - Create mode field states
   - Edit mode field states
   - Transition between modes

2. **Dependent Fields**
   - Trigger field changes
   - Expected field state changes

3. **Form Submission**
   - Valid submission
   - Partial validation errors
   - Server error handling

**Output Format:**

```markdown
## Interaction Test Cases

### Scenario: Create New Account

| Step | Action                               | Expected Result                    |
| ---- | ------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------- |
| 1    | Click "Create" button                | Dialog opens with empty form       |
| 2    | Leave all fields empty, click Submit | Show required errors on all fields |
| 3    | Enter username "admin"               | Show "username exists" error       |
| 4    | Enter valid username                 | Error clears                       |
| 5    | Enter password "123"                 | Show "min length" error            |
| 6    | Enter password "ValidPass1!"         | Error clears                       |
| 7    | Enter mismatched confirm password    | Show "password mismatch" error     |
| 8    | Enter matching confirm password      | Error clears                       |
| 9    | Click Submit                         | Account created, dialog closes     |
```

## Output

Generate a comprehensive test case document at:
`{target}/domain/src/lib/docs/QA-TEST-CASES.md`

### Document Structure

```markdown
# QA Test Cases - {Feature Name}

Generated: {current_date}
Source: {target_path}

## Table of Contents

1. [Form Fields and Validation Rules](#form-fields-and-validation-rules)
2. [Validation Error Messages](#validation-error-messages)
3. [Conditional Field Visibility](#conditional-field-visibility)
4. [API Payload Format](#api-payload-format)
5. [Boundary Test Cases](#boundary-test-cases)
6. [Interaction Test Cases](#interaction-test-cases)

---

{Generated sections from Steps 2-7}
```

## Notes

- Reports should be written in Traditional Chinese
- Focus on extracting actual validation rules from code, not assumptions
- Include translation keys for error messages to help QA verify correct text
- Cross-reference form field names with API payload field names
- Highlight any discrepancies between form validation and API expectations