# Landing Copy Cta

> Use whenever `landing-copywriter` drafts the CTA/close — the final ask, or any mid-page section `landing-sequencer` assigned the CTA. Trigger when a section carries the token system's CTA styling intent, distinct from every other archetype (which build the case, not make the ask).

- Skill: `majiayu000/landing-copy-cta` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add majiayu000/landing-copy-cta`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/majiayu000/landing-copy-cta/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: majiayu000 (https://skillmd.com/u/majiayu000)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/majiayu000/landing-copy-cta

---


# Landing Copy: CTA / Close

This is the ask. Every other section builds toward this moment; this
section's only job is to make the ask itself, matched to the urgency the
token system already specified. It is not a place to introduce new
argument, new proof, or new mechanism — if the case isn't made by the
time this section runs, that's an upstream section's gap, not something
to patch here with more copy.

## What this section answers

One thing: **what does the reader do right now?** Not why (that's every
section before this one), not what happens after (a line of reassurance
is allowed, but this section doesn't re-argue the case) — the specific
action, named as an action.

## The algorithm

Per `landing-copywriter`'s paragraph algorithm, a CTA-only section gets
**0 paragraphs — 1 line**, rendered as a `>` blockquote per the output
format. Where `landing-sequencer` assigns the CTA to a section that also
carries a beat (a closing section with both a payoff paragraph and the
ask), the CTA line still stays separate from the paragraph — never
merged into the last sentence of prose.

The line itself, in order:

1. **Verb first, plain and specific.** "Start your free trial," not "Get
   started" if there's a more specific verb available — "Get started" is
   correct only when it's genuinely the most specific true description
   of the action.
2. **Match the token system's urgency.** If `landing-systems` marked the
   CTA high-urgency, the verb mode carries that (imperative, immediate:
   "Start now"). If low-pressure, the verb mode matches (invitational,
   unhurried: "See how it works"). A CTA whose verb mode contradicts the
   token system's stated intent is a mismatch to fix here, not something
   `landing-builder` should silently soften or sharpen later.
3. **No stacked qualifiers.** One clear verb phrase — "Start your free
   14-day trial, no credit card required" crams a second claim into the
   CTA line itself; if that reassurance is load-bearing, it's a
   fragment of copy just below the button, not inside the CTA text.

## Writing standard (scoped to this section)

- Apply `landing-copywriter`'s full writing standard.
- **No stock closers.** Never end the page on "the future looks bright"
  or "join us on this journey" — the CTA is the specific action, not a
  sentiment.
- **No urgency manufactured with punctuation or caps.** Urgency comes
  from verb mode and the token system's specified intent, never from an
  exclamation point or all-caps standing in for an actual persuasive
  reason.
- **No hedge in the ask.** "You might want to consider starting a trial"
  fails here completely — the ask is direct or it isn't an ask.

## Self-test

- The line is a specific action verb, not a vague "Learn more" where a
  more specific true verb was available.
- Verb mode matches the token system's stated CTA urgency (high-pressure
  vs. low-pressure) — checked explicitly, not assumed.
- The line stands alone as a `>` blockquote, not merged into the
  preceding paragraph's last sentence.
- No new argument, proof, or mechanism claim appears in this section —
  if the case isn't made by now, that's flagged upstream, not patched
  here.

## Constraints

- Never introduce new persuasive content in the CTA section — its job
  is the ask, not one more argument.
- Never let the CTA's verb mode drift from what the token system
  specified for this build — a mismatch here is a defect, not a stylistic
  choice.
- Never stack a second claim or qualifier into the CTA line itself —
  supporting reassurance is separate copy, not part of the action verb
  phrase.

