# Pr Feedback Classifier

> Fetches and classifies PR review feedback with context isolation. Returns structured JSON with thread IDs for deterministic resolution. Use when analyzing PR comments before addressing them.

- Skill: `majiayu000/pr-feedback-classifier-2` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add majiayu000/pr-feedback-classifier-2`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/majiayu000/pr-feedback-classifier-2/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: majiayu000 (https://skillmd.com/u/majiayu000)
- Updated: 2026-09-22
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/majiayu000/pr-feedback-classifier-2

---


# PR Feedback Classifier

Fetch and classify all PR review feedback for the current branch's PR.

## Arguments

- `--pr <number>`: Target a specific PR by number (default: current branch's PR)
- `--include-resolved`: Include resolved threads (for reference)

Check `$ARGUMENTS` for flags.

## Steps

1. **Get current branch and PR info:**
   - **If `--pr <number>` specified in `$ARGUMENTS`**:

     ```bash
     gh pr view <number> --json number,title,url -q '{number: .number, title: .title, url: .url}'
     ```

   - **If `--pr` not specified** (use current branch):
     ```bash
     git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
     gh pr view --json number,title,url -q '{number: .number, title: .title, url: .url}'
     ```

2. **Fetch all comments:**

   ```bash
   # If --include-resolved in $ARGUMENTS:
   erk exec get-pr-review-comments [--pr <number>] --include-resolved
   # Otherwise:
   erk exec get-pr-review-comments [--pr <number>]

   erk exec get-pr-discussion-comments [--pr <number>]
   ```

   Note: Pass `--pr <number>` to both exec commands when specified in `$ARGUMENTS`.

3. **Classify each comment** using the Comment Classification Model below.

4. **Group into batches** by complexity.

5. **Output structured JSON** (schema below).

## Comment Classification Model

For each comment, determine:

### Actionability

- **Actionable**: Code changes requested, violations to fix, missing tests, documentation updates requested
- **Informational**: Bot status updates, CI results, Graphite stack comments, acknowledgments, automated review summaries

### Complexity (for actionable items)

- `local`: Single line change at specified location
- `single_file`: Multiple changes in one file
- `cross_cutting`: Changes across multiple files
- `complex`: Architectural changes or related refactoring needed

### Batch Ordering

1. **Local Fixes** (auto_proceed: true): Single-line changes
2. **Single-File** (auto_proceed: true): Multi-location in one file
3. **Cross-Cutting** (auto_proceed: false): Multiple files
4. **Complex** (auto_proceed: false): Architectural changes

## Output Format

Output ONLY the following JSON (no prose, no markdown, no code fences):

```json
{
  "success": true,
  "pr_number": 5944,
  "pr_title": "Feature: Add new API endpoint",
  "pr_url": "https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/5944",
  "actionable_threads": [
    {
      "thread_id": "PRRT_kwDOPxC3hc5q73Ne",
      "type": "review",
      "path": "src/api.py",
      "line": 42,
      "is_outdated": false,
      "action_summary": "Add integration tests for new endpoint",
      "complexity": "local",
      "original_comment": "This needs integration tests"
    }
  ],
  "discussion_actions": [
    {
      "comment_id": 12345678,
      "action_summary": "Update API documentation",
      "complexity": "cross_cutting",
      "original_comment": "Please update the docs to reflect..."
    }
  ],
  "informational_count": 12,
  "batches": [
    {
      "name": "Local Fixes",
      "complexity": "local",
      "auto_proceed": true,
      "item_indices": [0]
    },
    {
      "name": "Cross-Cutting",
      "complexity": "cross_cutting",
      "auto_proceed": false,
      "item_indices": [0]
    }
  ],
  "error": null
}
```

**Field notes:**

- `thread_id`: The ID needed for `erk exec resolve-review-thread`
- `comment_id`: The ID needed for `erk exec reply-to-discussion-comment`
- `item_indices`: References into `actionable_threads` (type=review) or `discussion_actions` (type=discussion)
- `original_comment`: First 200 characters of the comment text

## Error Case

If no PR exists for the branch or API fails:

```json
{
  "success": false,
  "pr_number": null,
  "pr_title": null,
  "pr_url": null,
  "actionable_threads": [],
  "discussion_actions": [],
  "informational_count": 0,
  "batches": [],
  "error": "No PR found for branch feature-xyz"
}
```

## No Comments Case

If PR exists but has no unresolved comments:

```json
{
  "success": true,
  "pr_number": 5944,
  "pr_title": "Feature: Add new API endpoint",
  "pr_url": "https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/5944",
  "actionable_threads": [],
  "discussion_actions": [],
  "informational_count": 0,
  "batches": [],
  "error": null
}
```