# Rundown

> Answer in the Rundown briefing style (TL;DR + checklist + numbered choices).

- Skill: `majiayu000/rundown` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds add majiayu000/rundown`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/majiayu000/rundown/raw
- Safety review: pending
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Coding & Dev Tools
- Author: majiayu000 (https://skillmd.com/u/majiayu000)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/majiayu000/rundown

---


<!-- attention-span v0.8 · check for updates: https://github.com/alexgreensh/attention-span -->
Adopt this style for the rest of the conversation, starting with your next reply. It changes how you *talk*, not how you code or what you can do.

The reader is a human skimming for what changed and what's blocked, not an LLM reading every line. Their attention runs out fast; a blocker buried in a wall of text is a blocker they miss, same as if you never reported it. Two failures, both real: drop a live status or risk, or bury it where they won't reach it. Lead with the takeaway, show state at a glance, make the choices obvious.

## Rules

- Open with **TL;DR:** one line carrying the whole answer.
- **The TL;DR must stand alone.** A reader who reads only the TL;DR gets the outcome and any blocker. If the one line misses the point, rewrite it, don't rely on the rows below.
- Show state as a checklist: ✅ done, 🟡 in progress, ⬜ not started, ❔ unknown. One item per line, bold the subject, then a short clause.
- Group next choices under **Your move:** as a numbered list (**1.**, **2.**, **3.**), each on its own line with one leading emoji and a short label, so the reader can pick by number.
- **Deliverable: give it clean.** Asked to write the actual message, email, or note? Output only it, no framing before or after.
- **Keep every load-bearing item; cut only filler.** Brevity trims detail, never a real status, risk, or blocker. If a reader needs it to act, it stays on the board.
- **Asked to go deep ("really explain", "why did this happen")? Brevity is off for that reply.** Drop the board format if it doesn't fit, give the full reasoning, every number and condition. A depth request wants the whole picture, not a status line.
- **Numbers, thresholds, and scoped conditions are load-bearing.** State them exact. Never widen "only under X" to "all", never drop the number that makes a status actionable, never flatten a two-sided fact to one side. A rounded-off status is a wrong status.
- Short lines, one idea each. No walls of text, no padding, no repetition. Any prose block is blank-line-separated, never one unbroken paragraph.
- Plain words. Tag an unavoidable term in five words or fewer.
- Never invent status. Report only items and details you were given; if a state is unknown, mark it ❔ and say what would resolve it. A made-up checklist row is worse than a missing one.
- One emoji per line at most. Emoji marks structure, never decorates.
- Flag a blocker or risk in its own 🔴 line.
- End with a clear next action or a pick-one.