# Source Credibility Analyzer > Source Credibility Analyzer - Skill: `majiayu000/source-credibility-analyzer-2` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files) - Install (CLI): `npx skillmds add majiayu000/source-credibility-analyzer-2` - Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/majiayu000/source-credibility-analyzer-2/raw - Safety review: pending - Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex - Category: Coding & Dev Tools - Author: majiayu000 (https://skillmd.com/u/majiayu000) - Updated: 2026-09-09 - Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/majiayu000/source-credibility-analyzer-2 --- /*============================================================================*/ /* SOURCE-CREDIBILITY-ANALYZER SKILL :: VERILINGUA x VERIX EDITION */ /*============================================================================*/ --- name: source-credibility-analyzer version: 2.0 description: | [assert|neutral] Standalone tool for automated source evaluation using program-of-thought scoring rubrics. Outputs credibility (1-5), bias (1-5), and priority (1-5) scores with transparent explanations. Use when evalu [ground:given] [conf:0.95] [state:confirmed] category: research tags: - general author: system cognitive_frame: primary: evidential goal_analysis: first_order: "Execute source-credibility-analyzer workflow" second_order: "Ensure quality and consistency" third_order: "Enable systematic research processes" --- /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S0 META-IDENTITY */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [define|neutral] SKILL := { name: "source-credibility-analyzer", category: "research", version: "2.0", layer: L1 } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S1 COGNITIVE FRAME */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [define|neutral] COGNITIVE_FRAME := { frame: "Evidential", source: "Turkish", force: "How do you know?" } [ground:cognitive-science] [conf:0.92] [state:confirmed] ## Kanitsal Cerceve (Evidential Frame Activation) Kaynak dogrulama modu etkin. /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S2 TRIGGER CONDITIONS */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [define|neutral] TRIGGER_POSITIVE := { keywords: ["source-credibility-analyzer", "research", "workflow"], context: "user needs source-credibility-analyzer capability" } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S3 CORE CONTENT */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ # Source Credibility Analyzer ## Kanitsal Cerceve (Evidential Frame Activation) Kaynak dogrulama modu etkin. ## Purpose Automate evaluation of research sources using transparent program-of-thought rubrics. Outputs structured JSON with credibility, bias, and priority scores (1-5) plus explanations showing calculation logic. Can be used as standalone tool OR integrated into general-research-workflow Step 3. ## When to Use This Tool **Use this tool when:** - ✅ Evaluating research sources for academic projects - ✅ Automating source classification (general-research-workflow Step 3) - ✅ Scoring large batches of sources consistently - ✅ Getting objective second opinion on source quality **Do NOT use for:** - ❌ Entertainment content (movies, novels) - not designed for this - ❌ Source quality already obvious (Nature paper = high, random blog = low) - ❌ Unique/irreplaceable source (only source on obscure topic) - read anyway **Decision Tree**: If manual source evaluation takes >10 min → use this tool (saves 15-45 min per source) ## Quick Reference | Step | Objective | Deliverable | Duration | Quality Gate | |------|-----------|-------------|----------|--------------| | 0 | Validate inputs | Confirmed metadata | 30 sec | Required fields present | | 0.5 | Classify source type | Source category | 1 min | Type assigned | | 1 | Calculate credibility | Score 1-5 + explanation | 2-5 min | Score justified | | 2 | Calculate bias | Score 1-5 + explanation | 2-5 min | Score justified | | 3 | Calculate priority | Score 1-5 + explanation | 1-3 min | Score justified | | 4 | Resolve conflicts | Final recommendation | 1 min | Logic correct | | 5 | Generate output | JSON + storage | 1 min | Complete + stored | --- ## Agent Coordination Protocol ### Single Agent Execution - **Agent**: analyst - **Role**: Evaluate source using program-of-thought rubrics - **Workflow**: Sequential steps 0 → 0.5 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 ### Input Format ```json { "title": "[Required]", "author": "[Required]", "year": [Required, 1500-2025], "venue": "[Required]", "type": "[Required]", "citations": [Optional], "doi": "[Optional]", "url": "[Optional]", "institution": "[Optional]", "credentials": "[Optional]" } ``` ### Output Format ```json { "source": { ... }, "scores": { "credibility": {"score": [1-5], "explanation": "..."}, "bias": {"score": [1-5], "explanation": "..."}, "priority": {"score": [1-5], "explanation": "..."} }, "recommendation": { "action": "[READ_FIRST | READ_LATER | VERIFY_CLAIMS | SKIP]", "reason": "...", "conflicts": "..." }, "metadata": { ... } } ``` ### Memory MCP Tags Store with: `WHO=analyst`, `WHEN=[timestamp]`, `PROJECT=[topic]`, `WHY=source-scoring`, `CREDIBILITY=[score]`, `BIAS=[score]`, `PRIORITY=[score]`, `RECOMMENDATION=[action]` --- ## Step-by-Step Workflow ### STEP 0: Validate Input Metadata **Agent**: analyst **Objective**: Ensure required metadata is present and valid **Procedure**: 1. Check for ✅ **required** fields: - `title` (string, non-empty) - `author` (string, non-empty) - `year` (integer, 1500-2025) - `venue` (string, non-empty) - `type` (string, non-empty) 2. Note ⚠️ **optional** fields if present: - `citations` (improves credibility scoring) - `doi` (improves credibility scoring) - `institution` (improves credibility scoring) - `credentials` (improves credibility scoring) - `url` (for reference) 3. Validate data types and ranges: - Year must be integer 1500-2025 - All required strings non-empty 4. If validation fails → Return error with missing/invalid field name **Deliverable**: Validated metadata object **Quality Gate 0**: - **GO**: All required fields present, year valid (1500-2025) - **NO-GO**: Missing/invalid field → Return error to user --- ### STEP 0.5: Classify Source Type (Edge Case Handling) **Agent**: analyst **Objective**: Assign source to appropriate category for rubric baseline **Edge Case Decision Tree**: /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S4 SUCCESS CRITERIA */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [define|neutral] SUCCESS_CRITERIA := { primary: "Skill execution completes successfully", quality: "Output meets quality thresholds", verification: "Results validated against requirements" } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S5 MCP INTEGRATION */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [define|neutral] MCP_INTEGRATION := { memory_mcp: "Store execution results and patterns", tools: ["mcp__memory-mcp__memory_store", "mcp__memory-mcp__vector_search"] } [ground:witnessed:mcp-config] [conf:0.95] [state:confirmed] /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S6 MEMORY NAMESPACE */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [define|neutral] MEMORY_NAMESPACE := { pattern: "skills/research/source-credibility-analyzer/{project}/{timestamp}", store: ["executions", "decisions", "patterns"], retrieve: ["similar_tasks", "proven_patterns"] } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] [define|neutral] MEMORY_TAGGING := { WHO: "source-credibility-analyzer-{session_id}", WHEN: "ISO8601_timestamp", PROJECT: "{project_name}", WHY: "skill-execution" } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S7 SKILL COMPLETION VERIFICATION */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [direct|emphatic] COMPLETION_CHECKLIST := { agent_spawning: "Spawn agents via Task()", registry_validation: "Use registry agents only", todowrite_called: "Track progress with TodoWrite", work_delegation: "Delegate to specialized agents" } [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* S8 ABSOLUTE RULES */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [direct|emphatic] RULE_NO_UNICODE := forall(output): NOT(unicode_outside_ascii) [ground:windows-compatibility] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] [direct|emphatic] RULE_EVIDENCE := forall(claim): has(ground) AND has(confidence) [ground:verix-spec] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] [direct|emphatic] RULE_REGISTRY := forall(agent): agent IN AGENT_REGISTRY [ground:system-policy] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed] /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* PROMISE */ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ [commit|confident] SOURCE_CREDIBILITY_ANALYZER_VERILINGUA_VERIX_COMPLIANT [ground:self-validation] [conf:0.99] [state:confirmed]