# Testing Quality

> Coordinate research-focused testing and quality validation with clear constraints, gates, and confidence ceilings.

- Skill: `majiayu000/testing-quality` (Agent Skill, multi-file: 2 files)
- Install (CLI): `npx skillmds@latest add majiayu000/testing-quality`
- Raw SKILL.md: https://api.skillmd.com/api/skills/majiayu000/testing-quality/raw
- Safety review: pending (external: skill-scanner PASS, skillspector PASS)
- Works with: Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex
- Category: Research & Search
- Author: majiayu000 (https://skillmd.com/u/majiayu000)
- Updated: 2026-09-09
- Page: https://skillmd.com/skills/majiayu000/testing-quality

---




## STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

### Purpose
- Provide a hub for research testing skills (code review, functionality audit, verification, style audit, theater detection).
- Enforce constraint hygiene, quality gates, and explicit confidence ceilings on test results.
- Maintain structure-first documentation for all sub-skills.

### Trigger Conditions
- **Positive:** any request to validate research code, results, or quality using the contained sub-skills.
- **Negative:** non-research production testing (route to quality/operations categories).

### Guardrails
- Capture HARD / SOFT / INFERRED testing constraints (coverage targets, latency, risk tolerance, compliance).
- Two-pass refinement: choose appropriate sub-skill(s) → validate findings with evidence and ceilings.
- Route tasks to sub-skills: code-review-assistant, functionality-audit, verification-quality, style-audit, theater-detection.

### Inputs
- Artifact to test (code, models, data, results) and context.
- Constraints and success criteria; environment details if applicable.

### Workflow
1. **Scope & Route**: Record constraints and select relevant sub-skills; confirm INFERRED risks.
2. **Plan Checks**: Define coverage, tools, and expected outputs per sub-skill.
3. **Execute Tests**: Run selected skills, gather evidence, and log configurations.
4. **Validate & Synthesize**: Aggregate findings, mark severity, and apply confidence ceilings.
5. **Deliver & Store**: Provide consolidated report and next actions; update references/examples.

### Validation & Quality Gates
- Sub-skill selection justified and constraints mapped.
- Evidence attached to findings; ceilings aligned to evidence type.
- Recommendations include remediation steps and owners.

### Response Template
```
**Scope & Constraints**
- HARD / SOFT / INFERRED.

**Selected Checks**
- Sub-skill → rationale.

**Findings**
- Issue → evidence → severity → confidence ceiling.

**Actions**
- Remediation + owner + due date.

Confidence: 0.81 (ceiling: inference 0.70) - based on executed checks and evidence.
```

Confidence: 0.81 (ceiling: inference 0.70) - reflects validated testing coverage and findings.